Add the ability to specify the router-id/area-id when deleting the debug
ospf6 configuration.
The new commands are as follow:
no debug ospf6 border-routers router-id [A.B.C.D]
no debug ospf6 border-routers area-id [A.B.C.D]
Update the doc as well.
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Caracalli <ahmad.caracalli@6wind.com>
FRR uses bgp_route_match_add and checked the return
code in every place but one. Fix so that the
return code is looked at and warned against
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Coverity found a couple of spots where FRR was
ignoring the return code of generic_set_add.
Just follow the code pattern for the rest of
the usage in the code.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
In startup, zebra would dump interface information from Kernel in 3
steps w/o lock: step1, get interface information; step2, get interface
ipv4 address; step3, get interface ipv6 address.
If any interface gets added after step1, but before step2/3, zebra
would get extra interface addresses in step2/3 that has not been added
into zebra in step1. Returning error in the referenced interface lookup
would cause the startup interface retrieval to be incomplete.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Yuan <yyuanam@amazon.com>
Document the `sleep` statement so people know that we are sleeping
because we are waiting for the BFD down notification. If we don't
sleep here it is possible that we get outdated `show` command results.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Call the `show` commands less often to reduce the CPU pressure.
Also increase the wait time from 60 to 80 seconds to have spare room
for failures (4 times more). This is the latest measure wait time:
> INFO: topolog: 'router_json_cmp' succeeded after 20.08 seconds
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Reduce timers so we send hello packets more often and reduce dead
interval to converge faster.
Previous test wait amount:
> INFO: topolog: 'router_json_cmp' succeeded after 47.20 seconds
New test wait amount:
> INFO: topolog: 'router_json_cmp' succeeded after 20.08 seconds
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Currently, it is possible to configure IPv6 protocols for IPv4
redistribution and vice versa in CLI. The YANG model doesn't allow this
so the user receives the following error:
```
nfware(config-router)# redistribute ipv4 ospf6 level-1
% Failed to edit configuration.
YANG error(s):
Invalid enumeration value "ospf6".
Invalid enumeration value "ospf6".
Invalid enumeration value "ospf6".
YANG path: Schema location /frr-isisd:isis/instance/redistribute/ipv4/protocol.
```
Let's make CLI more user-friendly and allow only supported protocols in
redistribution commands.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
`yang_dnode_get` will `assert` if no YANG node/model exist, so lets test for
its existence first before trying to access it.
This `assert` is only acceptable for internal FRR usage otherwise we
might miss typos or unmatching YANG models nodes/leaves. For gRPC usage
we should let users attempt to use non existing models without
`assert`ing.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Description:
When grace lsa received, DUT is adding
the copy of the lsas to all nbrs retransmission list as part of
flooding procedure and subsequently incrementing the rmt counter in
the original the LSA. This counter is supposed to be decremented
when ack is received by nbr and the lsa will be removed from retransmission list.
But in our current scenario,
Step-1:
When GR helper is disabled, if DUT receives the grace lsa
it adds the lsa copy to nbrs retransmission list but original
LSA will be discarded since GR helper disabled.
Step-2:
GR helper enabled and DUT receives the grace lsa, as part
of flooding process all nbrs have same copy of lsa in their
corresponding rmt list which was added in step -1 due to this
the corresponding rmt counter in the original lsa is not getting
incremented.
Step-3:
If the same copy of the grace lsa received by DUT, It considers
as implicit ack from nbr if the same copy of the lsa exits in its
rmt list and subsequently decrement the rmt counter.
Since counter is zero (because of step-1 and 2) , it is asserting while decrement.
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Girada <rgirada@vmware.com>
No functional difference, but `length "0"` is more comprehensible.
Suggested-by: Christian Hopps <chopps@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
The lsa->expire thread is for keeping track of when we
are expecting to expire(remove/delete) a lsa. There
are situations where we just decide to straight up
delete the lsa, but we are not ensuring that the
lsa is not already setup for expiration.
In that case just stop the expiry thread and
do the deletion.
Additionally there was a case where ospf6d was
just dropping the fact that a thread was already
scheduled for expiration. In that case we
should just setup the timer again and it will
reset it appropriately.
Fixes: #9721
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
1) Do not explicitly set the thread pointer to NULL.
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
2) Fix mixup of `struct eigrp_interface` and `struct eigrp`
usage of the same thread pointer.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Do not explicitly set the thread pointer to NULL.
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
1) Remove `struct thread *` pointers that are never used
2) Do not explicitly set the thread pointer to NULL.
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
With v6 interface based peering, we send the global as well as the LL address
as nexthops to the peer. When either of these were removed on the interface
we were not necessarily resetting the connection. Leaving bgp in a state
where the peer had reachability for addresses that are no longer in use.
Modify the code that when we receive an interface address deletion
event. Check to see that we are using the v6 address as nexthops
for that peer and if so, tell it to reset.
I initially struggled with a hard reset of the peer or a clear but
choose to follow other places in the code that we noticed address
changes that resulted in hard resets.
Ticket: #2799568
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
