Currently I get bgp_instance_del-test as well as bgp_l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf
failures every ~3-4 runs when under a 40 parallel run with micronet.
Examination of the failure and passing cases always leads to the
failures showing convergence of bgp bestpath immediately after
the show commands to ensure that the routes are there.
Modify the code to look for the fact that the vrf has
converged from routes being passed around across vrf's
and ensure that bestpath has run on them.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When debugging issues for routes in multiple vrf's. It would
be extremely useful if the debug output had which vrf we
are acting on.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Issue #9983 explains what is wrong with the GR helper mode.
To unblock the CI that fails almost all the time on the ospf_gr_topo1
test, remove the commands and disable the test. Also add a reminder to
completely remove the helper mode if no one fixes the code in a month.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
This can't really be run as part of CI, it's intended as a helper
instead, to use manually after poking around in the c-ares binding code.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
common_cli.c disables logging by default so stdio is usable as vty
without log messages getting strewn inbetween. This the right thing for
most tests, but not all; sometimes we do want log messages.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
949aaea5 removed debugs from all topotests, but this test relies on the
debug logs so it constantly fails now.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
When our CI test system is under high load, expecting bfd to
converge in under 2 seconds is not going to happen. Modify the test
suites to just ensure that things reconvderge.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Debugs take up a significant amount of cpu time as well as
increased disk space for storage of results. Reduce test
over head by removing the debugs, Hopefully this helps
alleviate some of the overloading that we are seeing in
our CI systems.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The test system under load looks for upstream state only
1 time immediately after sending 2 streams of S,G data
flowing. Give the system some time to process this
and ensure that it actually shows up in a small
amount of time.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The test_ldp_pseudowires_after_link_down test
shuts a link down and was blindly waiting 5 seconds
before just assuming the test system was in a sane
state. Remove the sleep(5) and actually look for
the changed state for the route 2.2.2.2 that the
psueudowire actually depends on.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The test does this:
a) shut link down
b) test for ospf convergence
c) ensure the route is installed
When under a heavily loaded system c) is not guaranteed
to happen quickly. Give the system 10 extra seconds
to ensure it happens.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The route replace test was doing this seq of events:
a) Create nhg
b) Install route w/ sharpd
c) Ensure it worked
d) Modify nhg
d) Ensure the update group replace worked
The problem is that the sharp code is doing this:
/* Only send via ID if nhgroup has been successfully installed */
if (nhgid && sharp_nhgroup_id_is_installed(nhgid)) {
SET_FLAG(api.message, ZAPI_MESSAGE_NHG);
api.nhgid = nhgid;
} else {
for (ALL_NEXTHOPS_PTR(nhg, nh)) {
api_nh = &api.nexthops[i];
zapi_nexthop_from_nexthop(api_nh, nh);
i++;
}
api.nexthop_num = i;
}
The created nhg has not been successfully installed( or at least
sharpd has not read the results yet) when it gets the command
to install the routes. As such it passes down the individual
nexthops instead. The route replace is never going to work.
Modify the code to add a bit of sleep to allow sharpd to
get notified when the system is under load. At this point
there is no way to query sharpd for whether or not it
thinks it's nhg is installed properly or not. This
test is failing all over the place for a bunch of people
let's get this fixed so people can get running
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
the test_nexthop_groups function is failing occassionally
because the test executes 4 in succession sharp install
routes commands. When I dumped the rib on a failed test
run there were only 2 of the 4 routes in the rib and
the two that were in were the last 2 installed.
The sharp daemon setups a event process where it
installs routes `automatically`. If the previous
run is not finished entering a new command to install
the routes will mess up the last one from ever happening.
It is assumed that the user doesn't do stupid stuff here.
In this case I am just adding a small sleep between each
installation to just let the test proceed.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
the isis_topo1 test has two functions where immediately
after the test ensures that the routes are in isis
tests to see if they are in the rib. Under system
load I am seeing this test failing because the
routes are still queued. Modify the zebra check
for the isis routes to look for the proper results
for 10 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Currently, we have a lot of checks in CLI and NB layer to prevent
incompatible IS-types of circuits and areas. All these checks become
completely meaningless when the interface is moved between VRFs. If the
area IS-type is different in the new VRF, previously done checks mean
nothing and we still end up with incorrect circuit IS type. To actually
prevent incorrect IS type, all checks must be done in the processing
code.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
This code has two issues:
a) The loop to test for successful installation re-installs
the route every time it loops. A system under load will
have issues ensuring the route is installed and repeated
attempts does not help
b) The nexthop group installation was always failing
but never noticed (because of the previous commit)
and the test was always passing, when it should
have never passed.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The test is checking installing of seg6 routes by this
loop:
for up to 5 times:
sharp install seg6 route
show ip route and is it installed
The problem is that if the system is under heavy
load the installation may not have happened yet
and by immediately reinstalling the same route
the same thing could happen again.
Modify the code to pull the route installation
outside of the loop and to increase to 10 attempts
in case there is very heavy system load.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The check_ping function `_check` function was asserting and being
passed to the topotests.run_and_expect() functionality causing
it to not run the full range of pings if one failed the test.
So effectively it was properly detecting pass / failure but
only allowing for 1 iteration if it was going to fail.
Modify the code to not assert and act like all the other
run_and_expect functionality.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
isis_tlvs.c would fail at multiple places if incorrect
TLVs were received in unpack_item_ext_subtlvs(),
causing stream assertion violations.
Signed-off-by: Juraj Vijtiuk <juraj.vijtiuk@sartura.hr>
The bgp_l3vpn_to_direct test is failing sometimes because
the 2.2.2.2 route is dissapearing. What is happening?
The log file for the failed test run shows us this:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 scripts/adjacencies.py:8 WAIT:r4:ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1: 0. packet loss:wait:PE->P2 (loopback) ping:60:0.5:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 Fri Oct 15 14:26:12 2021 (#9) scripts/adjacencies.py:8 COMMAND:r4:ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1: 0. packet loss:wait:PE->P2 (loopback) ping:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 COMMAND OUTPUT:PING 2.2.2.2 (2.2.2.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 64 bytes from 2.2.2.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.143 ms
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 --- 2.2.2.2 ping statistics ---
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.143/0.143/0.143/0.000 ms:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 Done after 1 loops, time=0.024507761001586914, Found= 0% packet loss
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 Fri Oct 15 14:26:12 2021 (#9) scripts/adjacencies.py:9 COMMAND:r4:ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1: 0. packet loss:pass:PE->P2 (loopback) ping +0.02 secs:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 2021-10-15 14:26:12,446 WARNING: topolog.r4: LinuxNamespace(r4): proc failed: rc 2 pid 28826
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 args: /usr/bin/nsenter -a -t 27444 -F --wd=/tmp/topotests/bgp_l3vpn_to_bgp_direct.test_bgp_l3vpn_to_bgp_direct/r4 /bin/bash -c ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:12 stdout: connect: Network is unreachable:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:17 COMMAND OUTPUT:connect: Network is unreachable:
build 15-Oct-2021 07:26:17 R:9 r4 PE->P2 (loopback) ping +0.02 secs 0 1
So the 2.2.2.2 route is coming/going and is failing on these test lines:
luCommand(
"r1", "ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1", " 0. packet loss", "wait", "PE->P2 (loopback) ping", 60
)
luCommand(
"r3", "ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1", " 0. packet loss", "wait", "PE->P2 (loopback) ping", 60
)
luCommand(
"r4", "ping 2.2.2.2 -c 1", " 0. packet loss", "wait", "PE->P2 (loopback) ping", 60
)
So the 2.2.2.2 routes on r1,3 and 4 are received via ospf, but are
modified by some other process to add labels ( probably ldp, since
it is running too ). The 2nd ping to 2.2.2.2 is failing because
the 2.2.2.2 route on r4 is being replaced. As an example here
is `ip monitor all` on r4 during boot up. Please note timestamps
are not necessarily representative of what we will see on the
loaded ci system.
[2021-10-15T15:46:52.261456] [NEXTHOP]id 27 via 10.0.2.2 dev r4-eth0 scope link proto zebra
[2021-10-15T15:46:52.261490] [ROUTE]2.2.2.2 nhid 27 via 10.0.2.2 dev r4-eth0 proto ospf metric 20
<snip>
[2021-10-15T15:46:53.556405] [NEXTHOP]Deleted id 27 via 10.0.2.2 dev r4-eth0 scope link proto zebra
<snip>
[2021-10-15T15:46:53.566575] [NEXTHOP]id 32 via 10.0.2.2 dev r4-eth0 scope link proto zebra
[2021-10-15T15:46:53.566585] [ROUTE]2.2.2.2 nhid 32 via 10.0.2.2 dev r4-eth0 proto ospf metric 20
For a small amount of time the route was *gone*. I believe the upstream
CI system hits that window sometimes, causing the test to fail.
This patch attempts to ensure that the 2.2.2.2 route should be learned
appropriately ( thus slowing it down ) before the test moves onto
the ping. I suspect the long term answer might be to add a test to
the scripts/adjancies.py script to ensure that the test does not
continue until the appropriate label is in place, but I want to
make the test run a bit more perscriptive in what it is looking
for here.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Recent commit 83f325901a had a accidental
turn of a 1 second wait into a 10 second wait
between retries. 10 seconds is too long.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Test doesn't wait long enough when it checks the routers after
restart. On slower systems, it frequently failed as it ran out
of time
Signed-off-by: Martin Winter <mwinter@opensourcerouting.org>
When our ci test system is under high load, expecting bfd to converge
in under 2 seconds is not going to happen. Modify the test suites
to just ensure that things converge. If we need actual functional
testing of bfd response times the topotests are not an appropriate place
to do this or we need to modify the test system to gather the data for
how long it takes after the tests are run.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
