Whenever OSPF virtual-link is created, a virtual interface is
associated with it. Name of the virtual interface is derived by
combining "VLINK" string with the value of vlink_count, which is a global
variable.
Problem:
Consider a scenario where 2 virtual links A and B are created in OSPF with
virtual interfaces VLINK0 and VLINK1 respectively. When virtual-link A is unconfigured
and reconfigured, new interface name derived for it will be VLINK1, which is already
associated with virtual-link B. Due to this, both virtual-links A and B will
point to the same interface, VLINK1.
During FRR restart when signal handler is called, OSPF goes through all the virtual
links and deletes the interface(oi) associated with it. During the deletion of interface
for virtual-link B,it accesses the interface which was deleted already(which was deleted
during deletion of virual-link A) and whose fields were set to NULL. This
leads to OSPF crash.
Fixed it by not decrementing vlink_count during unconfig/deletion for virtual-link.
Signed-off-by: Pooja Jagadeesh Doijode <pdoijode@nvidia.com>
We copy the password only if an existing peer structure didn't have it.
But it might be the case when it exists, and we skip here.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
event_add_XXXX functions have no failure path where
if you pass in a double event pointer that it could
return without setting the pointer. As such these
asserts make no sense and are unnecessary
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
event_add_XXXX functions have no failure path where
if you pass in a double event pointer that it could
return without setting the pointer. As such these
asserts make no sense and are unnecessary
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
While C compilers will generally process strings across lines, we really
don't want that. I rather treat this as the indication of the typo it
probably is warn about it than support this odd C edge case.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
The token value can be NULL if we run into something that failed to
parse. Throw a Python exception rather than SEGV.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Before it was setting SDIR, which is /usr/lib/frr, but the vtysh binary is put
under bindir (which is /usr/local by default). And running `/usr/lib/frr/frr reload`
failed.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
It's not 4 bytes, it was assuming the same as Graceful-Restart tuples.
LLGR has more 3 bytes (Long-lived Stale Time).
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
For instance, if we receive the routes from the peer with the next-hop as me,
but those routes shares the same network, we can fake the next-hop.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
All the event changes exposed a bunch of places where
we were not properly following our standards. Just
clean them up in one big fell swoop.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Effectively a massive search and replace of
`struct thread` to `struct event`. Using the
term `thread` gives people the thought that
this event system is a pthread when it is not
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This is a first in a series of commits, whose goal is to rename
the thread system in FRR to an event system. There is a continual
problem where people are confusing `struct thread` with a true
pthread. In reality, our entire thread.c is an event system.
In this commit rename the thread.[ch] files to event.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Problem:
Multiple memory leaks after pr12366
RCA:
ospf_lsa_unlock was not happening for the few of the LSAs in
ospf_lsa_refresh_walker after pr12366 due to which memory
related to lsas was leaking.
Fix:
Moved the ospf_lsa_unlock outside if check.
Signed-off-by: Manoj Naragund <mnaragund@vmware.com>
