The call into pim_cmd_lookup_vrf may be NULL
and dereferencing it before ensuring that the
vrf pointer is non-NULL is a good way to crash.
A crash can be initiated in pim:
eva# show ip msdp vrf NOEXIST mesh-group
vtysh: error reading from pimd: Permission denied (13)Warning: closing connection to pimd because of an I/O error!
eva# 2022/08/15 11:47:38 [PHJDC-499N2][EC 100663314] STARVATION: task vtysh_rl_read (560b77f76de6) ran for 16777ms (cpu time 0ms)
eva#
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When calling pim_upstream_add, the lookup for upstream
or the creation of the upstream cannot fail. As such
up is never NULL.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
in pim_ifchannel.c there exists several spots where
the ch->upstream is assumed to be NULL. This is not
possible.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The problem here is when the same node is FHR as well as RP,
then the node keeps on sending the register packet.
Register-stop is not sent as well.
This problem has occurred because the RP is the same node
and there is no socket created on loopback interface, so the
packet is never send out and never received back on the same
node, so register recv could not be processed on the node and
hence no register-stop is sent.
Since register packets are unicast packets, its better to handle
the send of register packet via a separate register socket.
This fixes the problem mentioned above as well.
Fixes: #11331
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
Change the show running commands for bsm and vxlan pimv4 and pimv6
debug commands based on the address family.
Including bsm and vxlan in no debug pimv6 debug.
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
Allow the same group/source route to be configured on more than one interface.
Currently FRR doesn't allow adding the same mroute on different input interfaces.
Current behavior, if we have the following config:
```
interface eth1
ip mroute eth0 239.0.0.1
interface eth2
ip mroute eth0 239.0.0.1
```
Only one multicast route will be installed with an input interface of the last
interface configured.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
Topology:
R1(LHR) ---- R2 ----R4(FHR)
---- R3 ----
R2 = RP
Steps to reproduce:
1. R1(LHR) sends IGMP join, R4(FHR) sends multicast traffic.
Verify traffic is flowing from FHR to LHR.
2. Restart R1(LHR).
3. Below sequence of events are happening after FRR restart in R1(LHR).
4. R1(LHR) Register RP address to Zebra.
5. R1(LHR) Receive update from Zebra that R2(RP) is reachable via R3.
6. R1(LHR) Receive IGMP join for group 225.1.1.1, will create pim upstream
and (*,G) mroute with IIF towards R3.
7. R1(LHR) Receive update from Zebra that RP is reachable via R2(RP).
8. R1(LHR) Update the PIM upstream IIF, but not updating the (*,G) IIF
even there is RPF change.
9. R1(LHR) receives IGMP join for group 225.1.1.2, will create (*,G) with
IIF towards R2(RP), both upstream and (,G) created with IIF towards R2(RP).
Root Cause:
Mroute IIF is not getting updated when better route update
received. It is still pointing to the older nexthop.
Fix:
Update the mroute IIF when there is change in nexthop.
Fixing Issue #11675
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Coverity is complaining that buf has not been initialized.
It has and coverity appears to be confused so let's help it
find the initialization.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The API pim_rp_check_interface_addrs checks if the RP address matches
with the primary address then it returns true.
In case of PIMv4 this condition is true, therefore the router becomes RP.
But in case of PIMv6, this condition does not pass because primary address
for PIMv6 is link-local address.
Also PIMv4 allows secondary addresses to be used as RP
if it is a host route in case primary does not match.
Fixing it by only checking the configured
RP address with the interface address and ignoring the prefix
length since it does not matter.
Fixes: #11335
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
In several places, we are getting the vrf structure using
vrf_lookup_by_name(). Again we are passing vrf->vrf_id to
pim_get_pim_instance() to get the pim_instance.
The API pim_get_pim_instance() again get the VRF structure using
vrf_lookup_by_id(). This is avoided in this PR.
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Longest possible length of a IPV6 (S,G) string is 94 bytes
INET6_ADDRSTRLEN * 2 = 46 * 2
(,) = 1
NULL Character at end = 1
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
These are in packed structs at weird offsets (e.g. 2 bytes), and as such
need a memcpy to get them into proper alignment.
It'd be even better if the pimd code used proper de/serialization, but
let's get this improved one step at a time.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
"show ip pim interface traffic json" shows pruneTx first and then
pruneRx stats
where as
"show ip pim interface <ifname> json" shows pruneRx first and then
pruneTx stats.
Although the values are right but the display looks odd.
Making it same as other stats, first display Rx and then Tx.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
