This commit adds a command to sharpd to validate the proof of concept for
traffic control on specific interface with specific filters.
Signed-off-by: Siger Yang <siger.yang@outlook.com>
This commit adds ZAPI encoders & decoders for traffic control operations, which
include tc_qdisc, tc_class and tc_filter.
Signed-off-by: Siger Yang <siger.yang@outlook.com>
This allows Zebra to manage QDISC, TCLASS, TFILTER in kernel and do cleaning
jobs when it starts up.
Signed-off-by: Siger Yang <siger.yang@outlook.com>
The latest FRR's frr-reload.py is broken and we can't reload FRR
gracefully with segment routing locator configuration (if we
execute frr-reload.py, FRR will stop suddenly).
The root cause of this issue is very simple. FRR will display the
current configuration like this (the below is the result of
"show running-configuration").
``
segment-routing
srv6
locators
locator default
prefix fd00:1:0:1::/64 block-len 40 node-len 24 func-bits 16
exit
!
exit
!
exit
!
exit
```
However, FRR doesn't accept segment routing locator parameters
if we specify block-len and node-len earlier than func-bits.
Signed-off-by: Ryoga Saito <ryoga.saito@linecorp.com>
Description:
As part of signal handler ospf_finish_final(), lsas are originated
and added to refresh queues are not freed.
One such leak is :
==2869285== 432 (40 direct, 392 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 159 of 221
==2869285== at 0x484DA83: calloc (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==2869285== by 0x4910EC3: qcalloc (memory.c:116)
==2869285== by 0x199024: ospf_refresher_register_lsa (ospf_lsa.c:4017)
==2869285== by 0x199024: ospf_refresher_register_lsa (ospf_lsa.c:3979)
==2869285== by 0x19A37F: ospf_network_lsa_install (ospf_lsa.c:2680)
==2869285== by 0x19A37F: ospf_lsa_install (ospf_lsa.c:2941)
==2869285== by 0x19C18F: ospf_network_lsa_update (ospf_lsa.c:1099)
==2869285== by 0x1931ED: ism_change_state (ospf_ism.c:556)
==2869285== by 0x1931ED: ospf_ism_event (ospf_ism.c:596)
==2869285== by 0x494E0B0: thread_call (thread.c:2006)
==2869285== by 0x494E395: _thread_execute (thread.c:2098)
==2869285== by 0x19FBC6: nsm_change_state (ospf_nsm.c:695)
==2869285== by 0x19FBC6: ospf_nsm_event (ospf_nsm.c:861)
==2869285== by 0x494E0B0: thread_call (thread.c:2006)
==2869285== by 0x494E395: _thread_execute (thread.c:2098)
==2869285== by 0x19020B: ospf_if_cleanup (ospf_interface.c:322)
==2869285== by 0x192D0C: ism_interface_down (ospf_ism.c:393)
==2869285== by 0x193028: ospf_ism_event (ospf_ism.c:584)
==2869285== by 0x494E0B0: thread_call (thread.c:2006)
==2869285== by 0x494E395: _thread_execute (thread.c:2098)
==2869285== by 0x190F10: ospf_if_down (ospf_interface.c:851)
==2869285== by 0x1911D6: ospf_if_free (ospf_interface.c:341)
==2869285== by 0x1E6E98: ospf_finish_final (ospfd.c:748)
==2869285== by 0x1E6E98: ospf_deferred_shutdown_finish (ospfd.c:578)
==2869285== by 0x1E7727: ospf_finish (ospfd.c:682)
==2869285== by 0x1E7727: ospf_terminate (ospfd.c:652)
==2869285== by 0x18852B: sigint (ospf_main.c:105)
==2869285== by 0x493BE12: frr_sigevent_process (sigevent.c:130)
==2869285== by 0x494DCD4: thread_fetch (thread.c:1775)
==2869285== by 0x4905022: frr_run (libfrr.c:1197)
==2869285== by 0x187891: main (ospf_main.c:235)
Added a fix to cleanup all these queue pointers and corresponing lsas in it.
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Girada <rgirada@vmware.com>
This is for run_and_expect_type and run_and_expect topotests method.
Some contributions unintentionally get merged with very low values, that leads
to CI failures, let's guard this a bit.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
As per RFC 7761, Section 4.9.1
The RPT (or Rendezvous Point Tree) bit is a 1-bit value for use
with PIM Join/Prune messages (see Section 4.9.5.1). If the
WC bit is 1, the RPT bit MUST be 1.
ANVL conformance test case is trying to verify this and is failing.
Issue: #12354
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
As per RFC 7761, Section 4.9.1
The RPT (or Rendezvous Point Tree) bit is a 1-bit value for use
with PIM Join/Prune messages (see Section 4.9.5.1). If the
WC bit is 1, the RPT bit MUST be 1.
ANVL conformance test case is trying to verify this and is failing.
Issue: #12354
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
Ensure that the minimum time spent run and expecting is
5 seconds. Heavy load is not a reason to fail a test.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Seems that labeler does not work properly with comments, tested on my own
local repository.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
isis_lfa_topo1 topotests regularly fails at step 24. The test expects
that the BFD session between rt1 and rt2 comes down after shutting the
link between rt1 and rt2.
Since the BFD is multihop, the BFD can get back through rt3.
Set the BFD type to single-hop.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Steps to reproduce:
--------------------------
1. ANVL: Establish full adjacency with DUT for neighbor Rtr-0-A on DIface-0 with DUT as DR.
2. ANVL: Listen (for up to 2 * <RxmtInterval> seconds) on DIface-0.
3. DUT: Send <OSPF-LSU> packet.
4. ANVL: Verify that the received <OSPF-LSU> packet contains a Network- LSA for network N1
originated by DUT, and the LS Sequence Number is set to <InitialSequenceNumber>.
5. ANVL: Establish full adjacency with DUT for neighbor Rtr-0-B on DIface-0 with DUT as DR.
6. ANVL: Listen (for up to 2 * <RxmtInterval> seconds) on DIface-0.
7. DUT: Send <OSPF-LSU> packet.
8. ANVL: Verify that the received <OSPF-LSU> packet contains a new instance of the
Network-LSA for network N1 originated by DUT, and the LS Sequence Number
is set to (<InitialSequenceNumber> + 1).
Both the test cases were failing while verifying the initial sequence number for network LSA.
This is because currently OSPF does not reset its LSA sequence number when it is going down.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
Error: Error: Input required and not supplied: enable-versioned-regex
Error: Input required and not supplied: enable-versioned-regex
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Currently, in `zebra_srte_client_close_cleanup` we use the `RB_FOREACH`
macro to traverse the SR policies tree. We remove the SR policies within
the loop. Removing elements from the tree and freeing them is not safe
and causes a use-after-free crash whenever the
`zebra_srte_client_close_cleanup` is called to perform cleanup.
This commit replaces the `RB_FOREACH` macro with its variant
`RB_FOREACH_SAFE`. Unlike `RB_FOREACH`, `RB_FOREACH_SAFE` permits both
the removal of tree elements as well as freeing them from within the
loop safely.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
LL address is assigned, but we get a warning, that it's not:
Interface: enp3s0 does not have a v6 LL address associated with it, waiting until one is created for it
```
donatas-pc# sh int enp3s0
Interface enp3s0 is up, line protocol is up
Link ups: 0 last: (never)
Link downs: 0 last: (never)
vrf: default
index 2 metric 0 mtu 1500 speed 100
flags: <UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>
v4 Multicast forwarding is on
v6 Multicast forwarding is on
Type: Ethernet
HWaddr: 18:c0:4d:96:fa:3f
inet 192.168.10.17/24
inet6 2a02:4780:abc:0:e776:6220:1e21:44b1/64
inet6 fe80::ca5d:fd0d:cd8:1bb7/64
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
OSPF_MAX_LSA_SIZE does not represent the actual maximum size of LSA packets which may be larger than 1500 bytes. If relaying a large OSPF packet to the OSPF API, we do not allocate a big enough buffer to send over the API. This patch increases the maximum size of OSPF packets transmitted over the API.
Signed-off-by: ylopez <yoann.lopez@gmail.com>
