Back when I put this together in 2015, ISO C11 was still reasonably new
and we couldn't require it just yet. Without ISO C11, there is no
"good" way (only bad hacks) to require a semicolon after a macro that
ends with a function definition. And if you added one anyway, you'd get
"spurious semicolon" warnings on some compilers...
With C11, `_Static_assert()` at the end of a macro will make it so that
the semicolon is properly required, consumed, and not warned about.
Consistently requiring semicolons after "file-level" macros matches
Linux kernel coding style and helps some editors against mis-syntax'ing
these macros.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
The point of the `-std=gnu99` was to override a `-std=c99` that may be
coming in from net-snmp. However, we want C11, not C99.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
This prevents a failed IPSec connection from preventing DMVPN from working.
A failure situation can be reproduced using a Cisco peer, and and disabling then
re-enabling the tunnel IPSec protection (after the IPSec connection has
already been established).
Signed-off-by: Reuben Dowle <reuben.dowle@4rf.com>
If we have a SAFI conflict, ie we are trying to activate safi's
UNICAST and LABELED_UNICAST at the same time, we should not
cause bestpath to be rerun and we should not try to put
labels on everything.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Should return an actual useful error message.
Commit: 055679e915 messed this error message
up.
Fixes: #8246
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The following error is shown when running the OSPFv3 tests
2021-03-16 23:37:44,792 INFO: Function returned global name 'data_rid' is not defined
2021-03-16 23:37:44,792 INFO: Retry [#1] after sleeping for 2s
2021-03-16 23:37:46,794 INFO: Verifying OSPF6 neighborship on router r1:
2021-03-16 23:37:46,993 INFO: Output for command [ show ipv6 ospf6 neighbor ] on router r1:
Neighbor ID Pri DeadTime State/IfState Duration I/F[State]
2.2.2.2 1 00:00:03 Full/PointToPoint 00:00:01 r1-r2-eth0[PointToPoint]
Fix the "data_rid" warning by using the correct variable
Signed-off-by: ckishimo <carles.kishimoto@gmail.com>
When removing an interface from an existing area,
the warning message we get is not correct
interface r1-r2-eth0
ipv6 address 2013:12::1/64
ipv6 ospf6 dead-interval 4
ipv6 ospf6 hello-interval 1
!
interface dummy
ipv6 ospf6 dead-interval 4
ipv6 ospf6 hello-interval 1
ipv6 ospf6 network point-to-point
!
router ospf6
ospf6 router-id 1.1.1.1
interface r1-r2-eth0 area 0.0.0.0
!
r1(config-if)# router ospf6
r1(config-ospf6)# no interface dummy area 0.0.0.0
No such Area-ID: 0.0.0.0 <--- area 0.0.0.0 exists
This is fixing the error message
Signed-off-by: ckishimo <carles.kishimoto@gmail.com>
This bug was first reported in PR#7717. When removing an interface
from the area, the interface prefix is still shown
r1# sh ipv6 ospf6 interface prefix
*N IA 2013:12::/64 ::1 r1-r2-eth0 00:00:12
r1# conf t
r1(config)# router ospf6
r1(config-ospf6)# no interface r1-r2-eth0 area 0.0.0.0
r1(config-ospf6)# exit
r1# sh ipv6 ospf6 interface prefix
*N IA 2013:12::/64 ::1 r1-r2-eth0 00:00:22
This fix will check if the interface is disabled so the
prefix is not shown
Signed-off-by: ckishimo <carles.kishimoto@gmail.com>
In OSPFv3 when removing the interface from an area, all ospf6
interface commands are lost, so when changing the area you need
to reconfigure all ospf6 interface commands again
r1# sh run
interface r1-r2-eth0
ipv6 address 2013:12::1/64
ipv6 ospf6 dead-interval 4
ipv6 ospf6 hello-interval 1
ipv6 ospf6 network point-to-point
!
router ospf6
ospf6 router-id 1.1.1.1
interface r1-r2-eth0 area 0.0.0.0
!
r1# conf t
r1(config)# router ospf6
r1(config-ospf6)# no interface r1-r2-eth0 area 0.0.0.0
r1(config-ospf6)# exit
r1# sh run
interface r1-r2-eth0
ipv6 address 2013:12::1/64
! <----- missing all ipv6 ospf6 commands
router ospf6
ospf6 router-id 1.1.1.1
!
This is because the interface is being deleted instead of disabled
(see PR#7717) I believe the interface should be left as disabled
(not deleted) when removing the interface from the area
Signed-off-by: ckishimo <carles.kishimoto@gmail.com>
Currently there is a single interval for both RX and TX echo functions.
This commit introduces separate RX and TX timers for echo packets.
The main advantage is to be able to set the receive interval to zero
when we don't want to receive echo packets from the remote system.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Add a control and api for the use of backup nexthops in
recursive resolution. With 'no', we won't try to use installed
backup nexthops when resolving a recursive route.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@voltanet.io>
When there are too many LSA updates to be sent in a packet the code needs to
correctly clear the locks that are taken while walking the lists and then wait
for the appropriate timer to expire to continue walking the list. The routine
that was being called would not properly remove all the locks that needed to be
cleared, and would also try to incorrectly delete the lsa/route. The code now
clears the locks and leaves the lsa on the list. When the timers fire again
the code continues walking the list to send the rest of the lsas to the
neighbor.
Signed-off-by: Lynne Morrison <lynne@voltanet.io>
Add some extra notes to the dev doc section about writing new
topotests: check for OS/kernel support if necessary; avoid
volatile or unstable data like ifindices or link-locals.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@voltanet.io>
The v6 LL commit 8761cd6ddb
incorrectly was setting the metric value to 1 for the underlying
connected interface. Modify the code to use a metric value of 0
instead of 1 that now represents the actual metric value that
was originally passed up.
This was noticed when the `show bgp ipv4 uni` command was
inserting a `(metric 1)` into output where before it was not.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Echo-mode implementation is currently broken. Instead of sending packets
to it's own address, bfdd is sending echo packets to the peer's address.
It may seem to work when testing between two FRR instances, because FRR
loops back such packets, but no other implementation is supposed to do
that.
Let's warn users that the current implementation works only between two
FRR instances.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Currently this timer is only started when we receive the first echo
packet. If we never receive the packet, the timer is never started and
the user falsely assumes that echo function is working.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Add support for the read-only snmp mib objects as described in RFC 3815
that are statistics.
Signed-off-by: Lynne Morrison <lynne@voltanet.io>
Signed-off-by: Karen Schoener <karen@voltanet.io>
Additional example usage of iproute2_is_vrf_capable check in
isis-topo1-vrf topotest.
Signed-off-by: David Schweizer <dschweizer@opensourcerouting.org>
Recent change in commit: 6b73800ba2
Caused this error to pop up in pim_igmp_mtrace.c:
error: taking address of packed member 'rsp_addr' of class or structure 'igmp_mtrace' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Werror,-Waddress-of-packed-member]
Follow the pattern used in the code to solve this problem for clang
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
