If we are using a nexthop for a MPLS VPN route make sure the
nexthop is over a labeled path. This new check mirrors the one
in validate_paths (where routes are enabled when a nexthop
becomes reachable). The check is introduced to the code path
where routes are added and the nexthop is looked up.
Signed-off-by: Pat Ruddy <pat@voltanet.io>
Two L3 next groups are installed per-VRF per-ES for v4 and v6. These
NHGs are used as an indirect destination for symmetric IRB host routes.
Using L3NHGs allows for efficient failover of an ES (similar to the
use of L2NHGs) i.e. when an ES goes down the number of dataplane
updates are limited to 2xN (where N is the number of tenant VRFs
associated with the ES) instead of updating all host-routes behind the
ES.
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
ES-VRF entries are maintained for the purpose of L3-NHG creation -
1. Each ES-EVI entry is associated with a tenant VRF. This associaton
triggers the creation of an ES-VRF entry.
2. Type-2/MAC-IP routes are imported into a tenant VRF and programmed as
a /32 or host route entry in the dataplane. If the destination of
the host route is a remote-ES the route is programmed with the
corresponding (keyed in by {vrf,ES-id}) L3-NHG.
3. The reason for this indirection (route->L3-NHG, L3-NHG->list-of-VTEPs)
is to avoid route updates to the dplane when a remote-ES link flaps i.e.
instead of updating all the dependent routes the NHG's contents are
updated. This reduces the amount of dataplane updates (fewer nhg updates vs.
route updates) allowing for a faster failover.
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
The `enum zclient_send_status` enum needs to be extended
throughout the code base to use the new states and
to fix up places where we tested against the return
value being non zero.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This should never happen; no need to debug guard it and it's not a
warning, if this isn't working then NHT is not working at all.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@nvidia.com>
This function is poorly named; it's really used to allow the FSM to
decide the next valid state based on whether a peer has valid /
reachable nexthops as determined by NHT or BFD.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@nvidia.com>
since the addition of srte_color to the comparison for bgp nexthops
it is possible to have several nexthops per prefix but since zebra
only sores a per prefix registration we should not unregister for
nh notifications for a prefix unti all the nexthops for that prefix
have been deleted. Otherwise we can get into a deadlock situation
where BGP thinks we have registered but we have unregistered from zebra.
Signed-off-by: Pat Ruddy <pat@voltanet.io>
Extend the NHT code so that only the affected BGP routes are affected
whenever an SR-policy is updated on zebra.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Fist, routing tables aren't the most appropriate data structure
to store nexthops and imported routes since we don't need to do
longest prefix matches with that information.
Second, by converting the NHT code to use rb-trees, we can index
the nexthops using additional information, not only the destination
address. This will be useful later to index bgpd's nexthops by
both destination and SR-TE color.
Co-authored-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
until now, the assumption was done in bgp flowspec code that the
information contained was an ipv4 flowspec prefix. now that it is
possible to handle ipv4 or ipv6 flowspec prefixes, that information is
stored in prefix_flowspec attribute. Also, some unlocking is done in
order to process ipv4 and ipv6 flowspec entries.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Added a macro to validate the v4 mapped v6 address.
Modified bgp receive & send updates for v4 mapped v6 address as
nexthop and installing it as recursive nexthop in RIB.
Minor change in fpm while sending the routes for nexthop as
v4 mapped v6 address.
Signed-off-by: Kaushik <kaushik@niralnetworks.com>
This is the bulk part extracted from "bgpd: Convert from `struct
bgp_node` to `struct bgp_dest`". It should not result in any functional
change.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
When there is a NHT change and the paths dependent on that NHT are being
evaluated, skip those that are marked for removal or as history.
When a route gets withdrawn, its valid flag is cleared and it is flagged
for removal; in the case of an EVPN route, it is also unimported from
VRFs (L2 and/or L3). bgp_process is then scheduled. Under rare timing
conditions, an NHT update for the route's next hop may arrive right after,
and if routes flagged for removal are not skipped, they may not only be
incorrectly marked as valid but also re-imported in the case of EVPN,
which will be a serious error.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ensure that only if there is a change to the path's validity based
on the NHT update, EVPN import or unimport is invoked.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
It is possible that the if_lookup_by_index() call will return
a NULL value and calling zclient_send_interface_radv_req. Just
test that we have a valid interface pointer.
Found by Coverity
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Problem reported that in many circumstances, RAs created in the
process of bringing up numbered IPv6 peers with extended-nexthop
capability enabled (for ipv4 over ipv6) were not stopped on the
interface when those peers were deleted. Found several circumstances
where this occurred and fix them in this patch.
Ticket: CM-26875
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
Problem Description:
=====================
+--+ +--+
|R1|-(192.201.202.1)----iBGP----(192.201.202.2)-|R2|
+--+ +--+
Routes on R2:
=============
S>* 202.202.202.202/32 [1/0] via 192.201.78.1, ens256, 00:40:48
Where, the next-hop network, 192.201.78.0/24, is a directly connected network address.
C>* 192.201.78.0/24 is directly connected, ens256, 00:40:48
Configurations on R1:
=====================
!
router bgp 201
bgp router-id 192.168.0.1
neighbor 192.201.202.2 remote-as 201
!
Configurations on R2:
=====================
!
ip route 202.202.202.202/32 192.201.78.1
!
router bgp 201
bgp router-id 192.168.0.2
neighbor 192.201.202.1 remote-as 201
!
address-family ipv4 unicast
redistribute static
exit-address-family
!
Step-1:
=======
R1 receives the route 202.202.202.202/32 from R2.
R1 installs the route in its BGP RIB.
Step-2:
=======
On R1, a connected interface address is added.
The address is the same as the next-hop of the BGP route received from R2 (192.201.78.1).
Point of Failure:
=================
R1 resolves the BGP route even though the route's next-hop is its own connected address.
Even though this appears to be a misconfiguration it would still be better to safeguard the code against it.
Fix:
====
When BGP receives a connected route from Zebra, it processes the
routes for the next-hop update.
While doing so, BGP must ignore routes whose next-hop address matches
the address of the connected route for which Zebra sent the next-hop update
message.
Signed-off-by: NaveenThanikachalam <nthanikachal@vmware.com>
Add new function `bgp_node_get_prefix()` and modify
the bgp code base to use it.
This is prep work for the struct bgp_dest rework.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Current failed reasons for bgp when you have a peer that
is not online yet is `Waiting for NHT`, even if NHT has
succeeded. Add some code to differentiate this.
eva# show bgp ipv4 uni summ failed
BGP router identifier 192.168.201.135, local AS number 3923 vrf-id 0
BGP table version 0
RIB entries 0, using 0 bytes of memory
Peers 2, using 43 KiB of memory
Neighbor EstdCnt DropCnt ResetTime Reason
192.168.44.1 0 0 never Waiting for NHT
192.168.201.139 0 0 never Waiting for Open to Succeed
Total number of neighbors 2
eva#
eva# show bgp nexthop
Current BGP nexthop cache:
192.168.44.1 invalid, peer 192.168.44.1
Must be Connected
Last update: Mon Feb 10 19:05:19 2020
192.168.201.139 valid [IGP metric 0], #paths 0, peer 192.168.201.139
So 192.168.201.139 is a peer for a connected route that has not been
created on .139, while 44.1 nexthop tracking has not succeeded yet.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
bgp nexthop cache update triggers RA for global ipv6
nexthop update.
In case of blackhole route type the outgoing interface
information is NULL which leads to bgpd crash.
Skip sending RA for blackhole nexthop type.
Ticket:CM-27299
Reviewed By:
Testing Done:
Configure bgp neighbor over global ipv6 address.
Configure static blackhole route with prefix includes
connected ipv6 global address.
Upon link flap, zebra sends nexthop update to bgp.
Bgp nexthop cache skips sending RA for blackhole nexthop type.
router bgp 65002
bgp router-id 91.189.93.190
...
neighbor 2001:67c:1360::b peer-group internal
static route:
ipv6 route 2001:67c:1360::/48 Null0 254
iface rowlink.4010
address 91.189.93.190/32
address 2001:67c:1360::a/128
Trigger ifdown rowlink.4010; ifup rowlink.4010
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@cumulusnetworks.com>
Problem statement:
When IPv4/IPv6 prefixes are received in BGP, bgp_update function registers the
nexthop of the route with nexthop tracking module. The BGP route is marked as
valid only if the nexthop is resolved.
Even for EVPN RT-5, route should be marked as valid only if the the nexthop is
resolvable.
Code changes:
1. Add nexthop of EVPN RT-5 for nexthop tracking. Route will be marked as valid
only if the nexthop is resolved.
2. Only the valid EVPN routes are imported to the vrf.
3. When nht update is received in BGP, make sure that the EVPN routes are
imported/unimported based on the route becomes valid/invalid.
Testcases:
1. At rtr-1, advertise EVPN RT-5 with a nexthop 10.100.0.2.
10.100.0.2 is resolved at rtr-2 in default vrf.
At rtr-2, remote EVPN RT-5 should be marked as valid and should be imported into
vrfs.
2. Make the nexthop 10.100.0.2 unreachable at rtr-2
Remote EVPN RT-5 should be marked as invalid and should be unimported from the
vrfs. As this code change deals with EVPN type-5 routes only, other EVPN routes
should be valid.
3. At rtr-2, add a static route to make nexthop 10.100.0.2 reachable.
EVPN RT-5 should again become valid and should be imported into the vrfs.
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
Recently had a case where I was attempting to debug a nexthop tracking
issue across multiple bgp vrf's and since the setup vrf's in it with
overlapping address ranges, it became real fun real fast to track
vrf data associated. Add a bit of code to allow us to figure out
what vrf we are in when we print out debug messages.
Look through the rest of the code and find debugs where we are
not using bgp->name_pretty and switch it over.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The functions nexthop_same() does not check the resolved
nexthops so I don't think this function is even needed
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@cumulusnetworks.com>
if bfd comes back up, and a bgp reconnection is in progress, theorically
it should be necessary to wait for the end of the reconnection process.
however, since that reconnection process may take some time, update the
fsm by cancelling the connect timer. This done, one just have to call
the start timer.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Avoid tracking 0.0.0.0/32 nexthop with RIB.
When routes are aggregated,
the originate of the route becomes self.
Do not track nexthop self (0.0.0.0) with rib.
Ticket: CM-24248
Testing Done:
Before fix-
tor-11# show ip nht vrf all
VRF blue:
0.0.0.0
unresolved
Client list: bgp(fd 16)
VRF default:
VRF green:
VRF magenta:
0.0.0.0
unresolved
Client list: bgp(fd 16)
After fix-
tor-11# show ip nht vrf all
VRF blue:
VRF default:
VRF green:
VRF magenta:
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@cumulusnetworks.com>
redirect IP nh of flowspec entry is retrieved so that the nexthop
IP information is injected into the nexthop tracking, and is associated
to the bgp_path structure. This permits validating or unvalidating the
bgp_path for injection in zebra or not.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Null check of 'rn' returned by bgp_node_lookup() because it could be
deferenced afterwards into bgp_nexthop_get_node_info()
Signed-off-by: F. Aragon <paco@voltanet.io>
The bgp_nexthop_set_node_info and bgp_nexthop_get_node_info
function names were slightly backwards, rename to bgp_node_set and get
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When we have a late registration of the Extended Nexthop capability
for BGP and the peer already has nexthop information stored, go
through and enable RA on the important interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
If we attempt to register nexthops before we have the zebra
connection, they will not be installed. After we have noticed
that we are up, re-install them.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Allow some debug notification when we are unable to talk
to zebra due to the connection not being there yet.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Recent changes to the nht code in bgp caused us to actually
keep a true count of v6 nexthop paths when using v4 over v6.
This change introduced a race condition on shutdown on who
got to the bnc cache first( the v4 table or not ). Effectively
we were allowing the continued existence of the path->nexthop
pointing to the freed bnc. This was especially true when
we had route leaking. So when we free the bnc make sure
we clean up the path->nexthop variables pointing at it too.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Do a straight conversion of `struct bgp_info` to `struct bgp_path_info`.
This commit will setup the rename of variables as well.
This is being done because `struct bgp_info` is not descriptive
of what this data actually is. It is path information for routes
that we keep to build the actual routes nexthops plus some extra
information.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
Testing Done: bgp-smoke completed with no new failures
While testing 5549 support using global addresses, discovered that
ipv6 nexthop tracking thru a route-reflector didn't work. Since
the next-hop used for remote nexthops resolves to the link-local
of the route-reflector, we need to track it in order to react to
interface down events. Also tripped over a crash in certain cases
which is also resolved in this fix.
The bgp_nexthop_cache data is stored as a void pointer in `struct bgp_node`.
Abstract retrieval of this data and setting of this data
into functions so that in the future we can move around
what is stored in bgp_node.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Currently we only support RFC 5549 in bgp via
using the `neighbor swp1 interface remote-as ...`
command. This causes the extended capability
data to be traded as part of the open message.
Additionally at that point in time we notify
zebra to turn on the RA code for that interface
so that the zebra trick of turning the v6 nexthop
into a 169.254.0.1 nexthop and adding a neighbor
entry works.
This code change does 2 things:
1) Modify bgp to pass the extended capability
if we are attempting to establish a v4/unicast
session over a v6 peer. In the past we limited
this to just the LL based peer.
2) Modify the nexthop tracking code to notice
when it receives nexthop data about the global v6
peer to turn on RA code on those interfaces we will
be using. This will allow the v4 route with a v6
nexthop received in zebra to auto translate this
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Routes that have labels must be sent via a nexthop that also has labels.
This change notes whether any path in a nexthop update from zebra contains
labels. If so, then the nexthop is valid for routes that have labels.
If a nexthop update has no labeled paths, then any labeled routes
referencing the nexthop are marked not valid.
Add a route flag BGP_INFO_ANNC_NH_SELF that means "advertise myself
as nexthop when announcing" so that we can track our notion of the
nexthop without revealing it to peers.
Signed-off-by: G. Paul Ziemba <paulz@labn.net>
Create a zapi_nexthop_update_decode function that both
pim and bgp use to decode the message from zebra.
There probably could be further optimizations but I opted
to keep the code as similiar as is possible between the
originals because they both make some assumptions about
code flow that I do not fully understand yet.
The real goal here is that I want to create a new
user of the nexthop tracking code from a higher level
daemon and I see no need to re-implement this damn
code again for a 3rd time.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Abstract the code that sends the zapi message into zebra
for the turn on/off of nexthop tracking for a prefix.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The flags value is not used for unregister events. Let's purposefully
not send anything and purposefully not accept non 0 for it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
This fixes the broken indentation of several foreach loops throughout
the code.
From clang's documentation[1]:
ForEachMacros: A vector of macros that should be interpreted as foreach
loops instead of as function calls.
[1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
When the underlying VRF is deleted, ensure that state for the
next hops that BGP registers with zebra for tracking purposes is
properly updated. Otherwise BGP will not re-register the next hop
when the VRF is re-created, resulting in the next hop staying
unresolved.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-17456
Reviewed By: CCR-6587
Testing Done: Manual, bgp-min, vrf
Most of the attributes in 'struct attr_extra' allow for
the more interesting cases of using bgp. The extra
overhead of managing it will induce errors as we add
more attributes and the extra memory overhead is
negligible on anything but full bgp feeds.
Additionally this greatly simplifies the code for
the handling of data.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
bgpd: Fix missing label set
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The FSF's address changed, and we had a mixture of comment styles for
the GPL file header. (The style with * at the beginning won out with
580 to 141 in existing files.)
Note: I've intentionally left intact other "variations" of the copyright
header, e.g. whether it says "Zebra", "Quagga", "FRR", or nothing.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Implement support for negotiating IPv4 or IPv6 labeled-unicast address
family, exchanging prefixes and installing them in the routing table, as
well as interactions with Zebra for FEC registration. This is the
implementation of RFC 3107.
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
In the future we plan to update Nexthop tracking to better
handle ipv6 lla. This commit will set this up for that.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When passing up NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4 pass up the ifindex as well
Zebra already stores this data by passing it up PIM will be
able to use NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4 without having to do a recursive
lookup.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@cumulusnetworks.com>
Views are supposed to be independent tables that have no connection to
routing tables. Since View's are 'independent' there is no way to do
'real' nexthop resolution since connected routes and interfaces are
associated with a particular table (or really vrf). So when we have a
bgp instance assume that nexthops specified are actually valid, since we
are propagating what our neighbors are telling us.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
[cherry-picked from master 6fa1ab2eecb39b35256739f7083196d6f556f639]
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
When zebra calls routing protocols back with either
ZEBRA_NEXTHOP_UPDATE or ZEBRA_IMPORT_CHECK_UPDATE
pass the distance value too.
This is to set us up for nht for pim as that it needs
the distance sometimes too.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
* Fix mild leak, bgp_nexthop_caches were not deleted when their peer was.
Not a huge one, but makes valgrinding for other leaks noisier.
Credit to Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> for doing the hard work of
debugging and pinning down the leak, and supplying an initial fix.
That one didn't quite get the refcounting right, it seemed, hence
this version.
This version also keeps bncs pinned so long as the peer is defined, where
Lou's tried to delete whenever the peer went through bgp_stop. That causes
lots of zebra traffic if down peers go Active->Connect->Active, etc., so
leaving bnc's in place until peer_delete seemed better.
* bgp_nht.c: (bgp_unlink_nexthop_by_peer) similar to bgp_unlink_nexthop, but
by peer.
* bgp_nht.c: (bgp_unlink_nexthop_check) helper to consolidate checking
if a bnc should be deleted.
(bgp_unlink_nexthop_by_peer) ensure the bnc->nht_info peer reference
is removed, and hence allow bncs to be removed by previous.
* bgpd.c: (peer_delete) cleanup the peer's bnc.
After BGP path selection, even if the best route entry selected has not
changed, ensure that the route is installed again in zebra if any non-best
but multipath route entry has a nexthop resolution change.
In the absence of this fix, if a non-best multipath route entry had a
nexthop resolution change (such as being resolved over two first hops instead
of one), the route would get reinstalled into zebra only in some situations
(i.e., when the best route entry had its IGP change flag set). If the route
does not get reinstalled by BGP, the corresponding route in the zebra RIB
would not have all the first hops.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Sid Khot <sidkhot@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-12390
Reviewed By: CCR-5134
Testing Done: Manual, bgp-smoke
(cherry picked from commit 3064bf43a7)
After BGP path selection, even if the best route entry selected has not
changed, ensure that the route is installed again in zebra if any non-best
but multipath route entry has a nexthop resolution change.
In the absence of this fix, if a non-best multipath route entry had a
nexthop resolution change (such as being resolved over two first hops instead
of one), the route would get reinstalled into zebra only in some situations
(i.e., when the best route entry had its IGP change flag set). If the route
does not get reinstalled by BGP, the corresponding route in the zebra RIB
would not have all the first hops.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Sid Khot <sidkhot@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-12390
Reviewed By: CCR-5134
Testing Done: Manual, bgp-smoke
Use the 'enum nexthop_types_t' instead of
the zebra.h #defines. And remove code from
zebra.h that does not belong there.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
lib/zebra.h has FILTER_X #define's. These do not belong there.
Put them in lib/filter.h where they belong.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0490729cc033a3483fc6b0ed45085ee249cac779)
Various changes and fixes related to VRF registration, deletion,
BGP exit etc.
- Define instance type
- Ensure proper handling upon instance create, delete and
VRF add/delete from zebra
- Cleanup upon bgp_exit()
- Ensure messages are not sent to zebra for unknown VRFs
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-9128, CM-7203
Reviewed By: CCR-4098
Testing Done: Manual
During CR for nexthop upstream it was noticed that usage
of prefix2str was not consistent. This fixes this problem
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When a BGP nexthop is registered for resolution, if it is learnt from an
EBGP peer and other conditions warrant (non-multihop peer and connected check
is not disabled), the registration includes a flag that indicates that the
nexthop must be resolved only if it is directly connected. In peculiar
situations - e.g., third-party nexthop or policy configuration - the same
nexthop could be learnt from an IBGP peer, and in general, nexthops learnt
from IBGP peers can be resolved over any route. This scenario was causing
a churn in the nexthop registration with the 'must-be-connected' flag being
repeatedly toggled as routes are received from both peers. The registrations
would in turn trigger significant processing.
The fix is to treat 'must-be-connected' as an overriding condition.
The repeated registration and related processing was also causing heavy memory
usage by BGP - for memory buffers used to hold registration information. This
fix will ensure that is no longer the case.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-8005, CM-8013
Reviewed By: CCR-3772
Testing Done: Manual, bgpsmoke (on 2.5-br)
When a nexthop change is received and processed, the change flags are not
examined correctly and route change flags not updated correctly. Fix to
ensure correct handling.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-8141
Reviewed By: CCR-3773
Testing Done: Manual verification
Note: Imported from 2.5-br patch bgpd-nht-fix-change-handling.patch
The API messages are used by zebra to exchange the interfaces, addresses,
routes and router-id information with its clients. To distinguish which
VRF the information belongs to, a new field "VRF ID" is added in the
message header. And hence the message version is increased to 3.
* The new field "VRF ID" in the message header:
Length (2 bytes)
Marker (1 byte)
Version (1 byte)
VRF ID (2 bytes, newly added)
Command (2 bytes)
- Client side:
- zclient_create_header() adds the VRF ID in the message header.
- zclient_read() extracts and validates the VRF ID from the header,
and passes the VRF ID to the callback functions registered to
the API messages.
- All relative functions are appended with a new parameter "vrf_id",
including all the callback functions.
- "vrf_id" is also added to "struct zapi_ipv4" and "struct zapi_ipv6".
Clients need to correctly set the VRF ID when using the API
functions zapi_ipv4_route() and zapi_ipv6_route().
- Till now all messages sent from a client have the default VRF ID
"0" in the header.
- The HELLO message is special, which is used as the heart-beat of
a client, and has no relation with VRF. The VRF ID in the HELLO
message header will always be 0 and ignored by zebra.
- Zebra side:
- zserv_create_header() adds the VRF ID in the message header.
- zebra_client_read() extracts and validates the VRF ID from the
header, and passes the VRF ID to the functions which process
the received messages.
- All relative functions are appended with a new parameter "vrf_id".
* Suppress the messages in a VRF which a client does not care:
Some clients may not care about the information in the VRF X, and
zebra should not send the messages in the VRF X to those clients.
Extra flags are used to indicate which VRF is registered by a client,
and a new message ZEBRA_VRF_UNREGISTER is introduced to let a client
can unregister a VRF when it does not need any information in that
VRF.
A client sends any message other than ZEBRA_VRF_UNREGISTER in a VRF
will automatically register to that VRF.
- lib/vrf:
A new utility "VRF bit-map" is provided to manage the flags for
VRFs, one bit per VRF ID.
- Use vrf_bitmap_init()/vrf_bitmap_free() to initialize/free a
bit-map;
- Use vrf_bitmap_set()/vrf_bitmap_unset() to set/unset a flag
in the given bit-map, corresponding to the given VRF ID;
- Use vrf_bitmap_check() to test whether the flag, in the given
bit-map and for the given VRF ID, is set.
- Client side:
- In "struct zclient", the following flags are changed from
"u_char" to "vrf_bitmap_t":
redist[ZEBRA_ROUTE_MAX]
default_information
These flags are extended for each VRF, and controlled by the
clients themselves (or with the help of zclient_redistribute()
and zclient_redistribute_default()).
- Zebra side:
- In "struct zserv", the following flags are changed from
"u_char" to "vrf_bitmap_t":
redist[ZEBRA_ROUTE_MAX]
redist_default
ifinfo
ridinfo
These flags are extended for each VRF, as the VRF registration
flags. They are maintained on receiving a ZEBRA_XXX_ADD or
ZEBRA_XXX_DELETE message.
When sending an interface/address/route/router-id message in
a VRF to a client, if the corresponding VRF registration flag
is not set, this message will not be dropped by zebra.
- A new function zread_vrf_unregister() is introduced to process
the new command ZEBRA_VRF_UNREGISTER. All the VRF registration
flags are cleared for the requested VRF.
Those clients, who support only the default VRF, will never receive
a message in a non-default VRF, thanks to the filter in zebra.
* New callback for the event of successful connection to zebra:
- zclient_start() is splitted, keeping only the code of connecting
to zebra.
- Now zclient_init()=>zclient_connect()=>zclient_start() operations
are purely dealing with the connection to zbera.
- Once zebra is successfully connected, at the end of zclient_start(),
a new callback is used to inform the client about connection.
- Till now, in the callback of connect-to-zebra event, all clients
send messages to zebra to request the router-id/interface/routes
information in the default VRF.
Of corse in future the client can do anything it wants in this
callback. For example, it may send requests for both default VRF
and some non-default VRFs.
Signed-off-by: Feng Lu <lu.feng@6wind.com>
Reviewed-by: Alain Ritoux <alain.ritoux@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Acked-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Conflicts:
lib/zclient.h
lib/zebra.h
zebra/zserv.c
zebra/zserv.h
Conflicts:
bgpd/bgp_nexthop.c
bgpd/bgp_nht.c
bgpd/bgp_zebra.c
isisd/isis_zebra.c
lib/zclient.c
lib/zclient.h
lib/zebra.h
nhrpd/nhrp_interface.c
nhrpd/nhrp_route.c
nhrpd/nhrpd.h
ospf6d/ospf6_zebra.c
ospf6d/ospf6_zebra.h
ospfd/ospf_vty.c
ospfd/ospf_zebra.c
pimd/pim_zebra.c
pimd/pim_zlookup.c
ripd/rip_zebra.c
ripngd/ripng_zebra.c
zebra/redistribute.c
zebra/rt_netlink.c
zebra/zebra_rnh.c
zebra/zebra_rnh.h
zebra/zserv.c
zebra/zserv.h
very easy to blackhole routes.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-6649
nexthop cache in BGP and registered for resolution with the nexthop
tracking (NHT) component. If the prefix were to be received from the
same peer with a different nexthop, the prior nexthop needs to be
processed for cleanup and unregistered and removed from the cache, if
appropriate. That is handled with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkataraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Dinesh G Dutt <ddutt@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
This adds support for BGP RFC 5549 (Extended Next Hop Encoding capability)
* send and receive of the capability
* processing of IPv4->IPv6 next-hops
* for resolving these IPv6 next-hops, itsworks with the current
next-hop-tracking support
* added a new message type between BGP and Zebra for such route
install/uninstall
* zserv side of changes to process IPv4 prefix ->IPv6 next-hops
* required show command changes for IPv4 prefix having IPv6 next-hops
Few points to note about the implementation:
* It does an implicit next-hop-self when a [IPv4 prefix -> IPv6 LL next-hop]
is to be considered for advertisement to IPv4 peering (or IPv6 peering
without Extended next-hop capability negotiated)
* Currently feature is off by default, enable it by configuring
'neighbor <> capability extended-nexthop'
* Current support is for IPv4 Unicast prefixes only.
IMPORTANT NOTE:
This patch alone isn't enough to have IPv4->IPv6 routes installed into
the kernel. A separate patch is needed for that to work for the netlink
interface.
Signed-off-by: Vipin Kumar <vipin@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
BGP: Fix network import check use with NHT instead of scanner
When next hop tracking was implemented and the bgp scanner was eliminated,
the "network import-check" command got broken. This patch fixes that
issue. NHT is used to not just track nexthops, but also the static routes
that are announced as part of BGP's network command. The routes are
registered only when import-check is enabled. To optimize performance,
we register static routes only when import-check is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Dinesh G Dutt <ddutt@cumulusnetworks.com>
When BGP connection setup was moved to rely on nexthop tracking, a few silly
bugs were introduced.
- bgp_connect_check() was called unnecessarily which resulted in false
positives which resulted in log messages indicating an error and the FSM
was unnecessarily reset.
- When routes to peer disappeared, and the peer was not directly connected,
the session was not immediately torn down, but only on hold timer expiry.
- When NHT indicated that route to session IP addr was available, the previous
state was not reset and as a result, connect retry timer had to expire
before a reconnection was attempted.
- connected check MUST be enabled only for EBGP non-multihop sessions and
only if disbale-connected-check option is not enabled.
This patch fixes all these errors.
change processing etc.) that refer to the BGP instance, the correct BGP
instance must be referenced and not the default BGP instance. The default
BGP instance is the first instance on the instance list. In a scenario
where one BGP instance is deleted (through operator action such as a
"no router bgp" command) and another instance exists or is created, there
may still be events in-flight that need to be processed against the
deleted instance. Trying to process these against the default instance
is erroneous. The calls to bgp_get_default() must be limited to the user
interface (vtysh) context.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
quagga: nexthop-tracking.patch
Add next hop tracking support to Quagga. Complete documentation in doc/next-hop-tracking.txt.
Signed-off-by: Pradosh Mohapatra <pmohapat@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dinesh Dutt <ddutt@cumulusnetworks.com>
