*_anywhere(item) returns whether an item is on _any_ container. Only
available for unsorted containers for now.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Using a non-NULL sentinel allows distinguishing between "end of list"
and "item not on any list". It's a compare either way, just the value
is different.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
This provides a "is this item on this list" check, which may or may not
be faster than using *_find() for the same purpose. (If the container
has no faster way of doing it, it falls back to using *_find().)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Some of the typesafe containers didn't null out their innards of items
after an item was deleted or popped off the container. This is both a
bit unsafe as well as hinders the upcoming _member() from working
efficiently.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Even if it doesn't matter for an unit test in general, it hides actual
leaks in the code being tested. Fix so any leaks will be actual bugs.
(Currently there aren't any, yay.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
It allows FRR to read the interface config even when the necessary VRFs
are not yet created and interfaces are in "wrong" VRFs. Currently, such
config is rejected.
For VRF-lite backend, we don't care at all about the VRF of the inactive
interface. When the interface is created in the OS and becomes active,
we always use its actual VRF instead of the configured one. So there's
no need to reject the config.
For netns backend, we may have multiple interfaces with the same name in
different VRFs. So we care about the VRF of inactive interfaces. And we
must allow to preconfigure the interface in a VRF even before it is
moved to the corresponding netns. From now on, we allow to create
multiple configs for the same interface name in different VRFs and
the necessary config is applied once the OS interface is moved to the
corresponding netns.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
When something is used only from zebra and part of its description is
"should be called from zebra only" then it belongs to zebra, not lib.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
... to speed up vector_empty_slot() among other things.
Behavior should be 100% identical to previous.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
When an ES is deleted and re-added bgpd can start sending MAC-IP sync updates
before the dataplane and zebra have setup the VLAN membership for the ES. Such
MAC entries are not installed in the dataplane till the ES-EVI is created.
Ticket: #2668488
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@nvidia.com>
In the window immediately after an ES deletion bgpd can send MAC-IP updates
using that ES. Zebra needs to ignore these updates to prevent creation
of stale entries.
Ticket: #2668488
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@nvidia.com>
This addresses deletion of ES interfaces that are were not completely
configured.
Ticket: #2668488
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@nvidia.com>
This script is failing occassionally in our upstream topotests.
Where it was changing route-maps and attempting to see if
summarization was working correctly. The problem was that
the code appeared to be attempting to add route-maps to
redistribution in ospf then modifying the route-maps behavior
to affect summarization as well as the metric type of that
summarization.
The problem is of course that ospf does not appear to modify
the summary routes metric-type when the components
of that summary change it's metric-type. So the test
is testing nothing. In addition the test had messed
up the usage of the route-map generation code and all
the generated config was in different sequence numbers
but route-map processing would never get to those
new sequence numbers because of how route-maps are processed.
Let's just remove this part of the test instead of trying
to unwind it into anything meaningfull
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Several tests used the route_map_create functionality
with `metric-type` but never bothered to add the
backend code to ensure it works correctly.
Add it in so it can be used.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This function doesn't work correctly with netns VRF backend as the same
ifname may be used in multiple netns simultaneously. So let's hide it
from the public API to reduce temptation to use it instead of writing
the correct code.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
When PTM sends a "cbl status" message it specifies the interface name
but not the VRF name. It is fine for VRF-lite, but doesn't work for
netns because it's possible to have multiple interfaces with the same
name. Be more restrictive in this case and return an error instead of
randomly using of the interface with the specified name.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
if_lookup_by_name_all_vrf doesn't work correctly with netns VRF backend
as the same index may be used in multiple netns simultaneously.
Use the appropriate VRF when looking for the interface.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
if_lookup_by_name_all_vrf doesn't work correctly with netns VRF backend
as the same index may be used in multiple netns simultaneously.
Use the appropriate VRF when looking for the interface.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
With netns VRF backend, we may have multiple interfaces with the same
name. Currently, the function output is not deterministic in this case,
it returns the first interface that it finds in the list. Be more
explicit and tell the user that we need the VRF name.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
With netns VRF backend, we may have multiple interfaces with the same
name. Currently, the function is not deterministic in this case as it
uses the first interface that it finds in the list. Be more restrictive
and ask the user to provide the VRF name.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
The fact that the interface name is used in some nexthop config doesn't
mean that the interface is configured.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
if_lookup_by_name_all_vrf doesn't work correctly with netns VRF backend
as the same index may be used in multiple netns simultaneously.
Use the appropriate VRF when looking for the interface.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Well, there are some weird and duplicated checks there...
All we need is two simple checks:
- VRF existence. We must have it to enable the session.
- Interface existence. If it's configured for the session, we have to
bind the session to the interface.
This commit implements these checks and removes unnecessary duplication.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Sphinx tries to parse :c:function: as function prototype, which doesn't
quite work with macros.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Sphinx warns about a few nits here, just fix. (Note :option:`-E` can't
be used without a "option:: -E" definition, it's intended as a cross
reference.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
We get the pointer to the interface on which the packet was received
right at the beginning of bfd_recv_cb. So let's use this pointer and
don't perform additional interface lookups.
Also explain in more detail how we process VRF id with different
backends.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
```
exit1-debian-9# show ip route 172.16.16.1/32
Routing entry for 172.16.16.1/32
Known via "bgp", distance 20, metric 0, best
Last update 00:00:28 ago
* 192.168.0.2, via eth1, weight 1
AS-Path : 65003
Communities : first 65001:2 65001:3
Large-Communities: 65001:1:1 65001:1:2 65001:1:3
Selection reason : First path received
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
