These two functions always return 0. As such any and all
tests against this make no sense. Remove the return 0
to a void and follow the chain, logically, to remove all
the dead code.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
```
unet> sh pe2 vtysh -c 'sh ip bgp ipv4 vpn detail-routes'
BGP table version is 4, local router ID is 10.10.10.20, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65001
Route Distinguisher: 192.168.2.2:2
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.2:2:10.0.0.0/24, version 1
not allocated
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Not advertised to any peer
65000
192.168.2.1 from 0.0.0.0 (10.10.10.20) vrf RED(4) announce-nh-self
Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 50, valid, sourced, local, best (First path received)
Extended Community: RT:192.168.2.2:2
Originator: 10.10.10.20
Remote label: 2222
Last update: Tue Dec 20 13:01:20 2022
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.2:2:172.16.255.1/32, version 2
not allocated
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Not advertised to any peer
65000
192.168.2.1 from 0.0.0.0 (10.10.10.20) vrf RED(4) announce-nh-self
Origin incomplete, localpref 50, valid, sourced, local, best (First path received)
Extended Community: RT:192.168.2.2:2
Originator: 10.10.10.20
Remote label: 2222
Last update: Tue Dec 20 13:01:20 2022
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.2:2:192.168.1.0/24, version 3
not allocated
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Not advertised to any peer
65000
192.168.2.1 from 0.0.0.0 (10.10.10.20) vrf RED(4) announce-nh-self
Origin incomplete, localpref 50, valid, sourced, local, best (First path received)
Extended Community: RT:192.168.2.2:2
Originator: 10.10.10.20
Remote label: 2222
Last update: Tue Dec 20 13:01:20 2022
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.2:2:192.168.2.0/24, version 4
not allocated
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Not advertised to any peer
65000
192.168.2.1 from 0.0.0.0 (10.10.10.20) vrf RED(4) announce-nh-self
Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 50, valid, sourced, local, best (First path received)
Extended Community: RT:192.168.2.2:2
Originator: 10.10.10.20
Remote label: 2222
Last update: Tue Dec 20 13:01:20 2022
Displayed 4 routes and 4 total paths
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Not all places were checking to see if soft reconfiguration
was turned on before calling into it to do all that work.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Column headers in BGP routes table are not aligned with data when
RPKI status is available. This was fixed to insert a space at the
beginning of the header and at the beginning of lines that do not
have RPKI status.
This fix requires that several testing templates be adjusted to
match the new output.
Signed-off-by: Wayne Morrison <wmorrison@netgate.com>
When bgp is using `bgp suppress-fib-pending` and the end
operator is using network statements, bgp was not sending
the network'ed prefix'es to it's peers. Fix this.
Also update the test cases for bgp_suppress_fib to test
this new corner case( I am sure that there are going to
be others that will need to be added ).
Fixes: #12112
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Re-work the bgp vni table to use separately keyed tables for type2
routes.
So, with type2 routes, we have the main table keyed off of the IP and a
new MAC table keyed off of MACs.
By separating out the two, we are able to run path selection separately
for the neigh and mac. Keeping the two separate is also more in-line
with what happens in zebra (they are managed comptletely seperate).
With this change type2 routes go into each table like so:
```
Remote MAC-IP -> IP Table & MAC Table
Remote MAC -> MAC Table
Local MAC-IP -> IP Table
Local MAC -> MAC Table
```
The difference for local is necessary because we should not ever allow
multiple paths for a local MAC.
Also cleaned up the commands for querying the vni tables:
```
show bgp vni all type ...
show bgp vni VNI type ...
```
Old commands will be deprecated in a separate commit.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
Use the IP addr of type2/macip routes only for the hash/key
of the VNI table and carry the MAC in a path_info_extra attribute.
There is exists situations that can be hit during extended MAC mobility events
where two MACs could be pointing to the same IP in our global table. It
is requires very specific timings.
When that happens, BPG would (because we key'd on both MAC and IP)
install both into it's VNI table as separate entries, but zebra only
knows/needs to know about a single IP -> MAC relationship for it's VNI
table's type2 routes. So it was compleletly undeterministic which one
zebra would end up with in these timing situations.
With these changes, we move BGP's VNI table to key'd the same as Zebra's
and now a single IP will have multiple path_info's with a path_info_extra
that is carrying the MAC info for each path.
BGP will then run best path to deterministically decide which one to send to
zebra during the occasions where there exist's two possible MACs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
RFC4364 describes peerings between multiple AS domains, to ease
the continuity of VPN services across multiple SPs. This commit
implements a sub-set of IETF option b) described in chapter 10 b.
The ASBR to ASBR approach is taken, with an EBGP peering between
the two routers. The EBGP peering must be directly connected to
the outgoing interface used. In those conditions, the next hop
is directly connected, and there is no need to have a transport
label to convey the VPN label. A new vty command is added on a
per interface basis:
This command if enabled, will permit to convey BGP VPN labels
without any transport labels (i.e. with implicit-null label).
restriction:
this command is used only for EBGP directly connected peerings.
Other use cases are not covered.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Move the logic to check the mp_nexthop_len against v6 lengths into its
own macro so we can apply that logic elsewhere on its own without always
checking for presence of BGP_ATTR_NEXT_HOP.
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
The same as with prefix-list/route-maps/etc.
```
donatas-pc# show ip access-list spine
ZEBRA:
Zebra IP access list spine
seq 5 permit 200.200.200.200/32
BGP:
Zebra IP access list spine
seq 5 permit 200.200.200.200/32
PIM:
Zebra IP access list spine
seq 5 permit 200.200.200.200/32
BABELD:
Zebra IP access list spine
seq 5 permit 200.200.200.200/32
donatas-pc# show bgp ipv4 unicast access-list
ACCESSLIST_NAME Access-list name
spine
donatas-pc# show bgp ipv4 unicast access-list spine
BGP table version is 9, local router ID is 172.17.0.3, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 200.200.200.200/32
enp3s0 0 0 65000 3456 ?
Displayed 1 routes and 10 total paths
donatas-pc#
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
This patch adds transpostion_offset and transposition_len to bgp_sid_info,
and transposes SID only at bgp_zebra_announce.
Signed-off-by: Ryoga Saito <ryoga.saito@linecorp.com>
Currently the Wait for Install code ( bgp_suppress_fib ) does
not properly handle two states from zebra: ROUTE_INSTALL_FAILED
and BETTER_ADMIN_DISTANCE_WON. Pre this change the WFI code
would just never notify our peers about a route install failure
but more is needed. In the ROUTE_INSTALL_FAILED and the
BETTER_ADMIN_DISTANCE_WON we need to notify our peers with
a withdrawal about the route, else we will continue to
draw traffic to us when we cannot legally do so.
Why is this needed? In either case imagine that we've already
received a bgp route, installed it and sent to our peers.
In the Better admin distance won case, say a static route is installed
at this point in time we must stop advertising the route through
us since we are not installed. As such a withdrawal must be sent.
In the ROUTE_INSTALL_FAILED case, the code was not properly handling
the situation where we have Route A, it was successfully installed
and then we received a update to Route A that was attempted to be
installed but failed. In this case we also need to send a withdrawal
Finally update the bgp_suppress_fib topotest to test both of these
situations.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Description:
Incorrect behavior during best path selection for the imported routes.
Imported routes are always treated as eBGP routes.
Change is intended for fixing the issues related to
bgp best path selection for leaked routes:
- FRR does ecmp for the imported routes,
even without any ecmp related config.
If the same prefix is imported from two different VRFs,
then we configure the route with ecmp even without
any ecmp related config.
- Locally imported routes are preferred over imported
eBGP routes.
If there is a local route and eBGP learned route
for the same prefix, if we import both the routes,
imported local route is selected as best path.
- Same route is imported from multiple tenant VRFs,
both imported routes point to the same VRF in nexthop.
- When the same route with same nexthop in two different VRFs
is imported from those two VRFs, route is not installed as ecmp,
even though we had ecmp config.
- During best path selection, while comparing the paths for imported routes,
we should correctly refer to the original route i.e. the ultimate path.
- When the same route is imported from multiple VRF,
use the correct VRF while installing in the FIB.
- When same route is imported from two different tenant VRFs,
while comparing bgp path info as part of bgp best path selection,
we should ideally also compare corresponding VRFs.
See-also: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/files/7169555/FRR.and.Cisco.VRF-Lite.Behaviour.pdf
Co-authored-by: Santosh P K <sapk@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Kantesh Mundaragi <kmundaragi@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Iqra Siddiqui <imujeebsiddi@vmware.com>
```
exit1-debian-9# show ip route 172.16.16.1/32
Routing entry for 172.16.16.1/32
Known via "bgp", distance 20, metric 0, best
Last update 00:00:28 ago
* 192.168.0.2, via eth1, weight 1
AS-Path : 65003
Communities : first 65001:2 65001:3
Large-Communities: 65001:1:1 65001:1:2 65001:1:3
Selection reason : First path received
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
Description:
Change is intended for fixing the following issues related to vrf route leaking:
Routes with special nexthops i.e. blackhole/sink routes when imported,
are not programmed into the FIB and corresponding nexthop is set as 'inactive',
nexthop interface as 'unknown'.
While importing/leaking routes between VRFs, in case of special nexthop(ipv4/ipv6)
once bgp announces route(s) to zebra, nexthop type is incorrectly set as
NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV6_IFINDEX/NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFINDEX
i.e. directly connected even though we are not able to resolve through an interface.
This leads to nexthop_active_check marking nexthop !NEXTHOP_FLAG_ACTIVE.
Unable to find the active nexthop(s), route is not programmed into the FIB.
Whenever BGP leaks routes, set the correct nexthop type, so that route gets resolved
and correctly programmed into the FIB, in the imported vrf.
Co-authored-by: Kantesh Mundaragi <kmundaragi@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Iqra Siddiqui <imujeebsiddi@vmware.com>
When bgp receives the admin distance from a redistribution statement
let's store that distance for later usage.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Add a terse option to show bgp summary to shorten output.
Do not show the following information about the BGP
instances: the number of RIB entries, the table version and the used memory.
The "terse" option can be used in combination with the "remote-as", "neighbor",
"failed" and "established" filters, and with the "wide" option as well.
Before patch:
ubuntu# show bgp summary remote-as 123456
IPv4 Unicast Summary (VRF default):
BGP router identifier X.X.X.X, local AS number XXX vrf-id 0
BGP table version 0
RIB entries 3, using 552 bytes of memory
Peers 5, using 3635 KiB of memory
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd PfxSnt Desc
10.200.200.2 4 123456 81432 4 0 56092 0 00:00:13 572106 0 N/A
Displayed neighbors 1
Total number of neighbors 4
IPv6 Unicast Summary (VRF default):
BGP router identifier X.X.X.X, local AS number XXX vrf-id 0
BGP table version 0
RIB entries 3, using 552 bytes of memory
Peers 5, using 3635 KiB of memory
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd PfxSnt Desc
% No matching neighbor
Total number of neighbors 5
After patch:
ubuntu# show bgp summary remote-as 123456 terse
IPv4 Unicast Summary (VRF default):
BGP router identifier X.X.X.X, local AS number XXX vrf-id 0
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd PfxSnt Desc
10.200.200.2 4 123456 81432 4 0 56092 0 00:00:13 572106 0 N/A
Displayed neighbors 1
Total number of neighbors 4
IPv6 Unicast Summary (VRF default):
BGP router identifier X.X.X.X, local AS number XXX vrf-id 1
% No matching neighbor
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
BGP configuration changes that imply recomputing the BGP route table
(e.g. modifying route-maps, setting bgp graceful-shutdown) might be a
long time process depending on the size of the BGP table and the
route-map numbers and complexity. For example, setups with full
Internet routes take something like one minute to reprocess all the
prefixes when graceful-shutdown is configured. During this time, a
"show bgp commands" request on vtysh results in blocking the shell until
the soft reconfigure table task is over.
This patch splits bgp_soft_reconfig_table task into thread jobs of 25K
prefixes.
Some tests on a full Internet route setup show that after reconfiguring
route-maps or graceful-shutdown, vtysh is not stucked anymore. We are
now able to request commands like "show bgp summary" after 1 or 2
seconds instead of 30 to 60s.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Just to be more informant, copying from Cisco.
```
exit1-debian-9# sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 4, local router ID is 192.168.100.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65534
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
N*> 10.0.2.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
N*> 192.168.0.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
N*> 192.168.10.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
N*> 192.168.100.1/32 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
Displayed 4 routes and 4 total paths
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
1. When a local ES is deleted or the ES-bond goes into bypass we treat
imported MAC-IP routes with that ES destination as remote routes instead
of sync routes. This requires a re-evaluation of the routes as
"non-local-dest" and an update to zebra.
2. When a ES is attached to an access port or the ES-bond transitions from
bypass to LACP-up we treat imported MAC-IP routes with that ES destination as
sync routes. This requires a re-evaluation of the routes as
"local-dest" and an update to zebra.
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
In the case of EVPN type-2 routes that use ES as destination, BGP
consolidates the nh (and nh->rmac mapping) and sends it to zebra as
a nexthop add.
This nexthop is the EVPN remote PE and is created by reference of
VRF IPvx unicast paths imported from EVPN Type-2 routes.
zebra uses this nexthop for setting up a remote neigh enty for the PE
and a remote fdb entry for the PE's RMAC.
Ticket: CM-31398
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Setup a mh_info indirection in the path extra. This has been done to
avoid increasing evpn route's path size to add new (type based) pointers
in path_info_extra.
Ticket: CM-31398
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
