Add new feature and commands to sharpd in order to collect Traffic Engineering
Database information from an IGP (OSPF or IS-IS) though the ZAPI Opaque
Message and the support of the Link State Library.
This feature serves as an example of how to code a Traffic Engineering
Database consumer and tests the mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
This patch allows to store Link State Information received through the various
LSAs into a dedicated Traffic Engineering Database (TED). This feature is
automatically activated once mpls-te is enabled.
A new CLI command `mpls-te export` permits to export the TED to other daemons
through the new ZAPI Opaque Link State messages. In complement, a new CLI
command `show ip ospf mpls-te database ...` output the contains of the TED to
the console.
Major modifications take place in ospf_te.[c, h]. File ospf_zebra.c has been
modified to handle TED synchronisation request.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
Add docs for commands to display BGP table per-RD.
Also update commands to mention flowspec, routes,
advertised-routes, and received-routes.
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
Add sequence no option to bgp as-path list cli syntax.
Add sequence no to example config.
Add auto generated sequence no in running-config if its not
provided in config.
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@nvidia.com>
Currently there is a single interval for both RX and TX echo functions.
This commit introduces separate RX and TX timers for echo packets.
The main advantage is to be able to set the receive interval to zero
when we don't want to receive echo packets from the remote system.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Echo-mode implementation is currently broken. Instead of sending packets
to it's own address, bfdd is sending echo packets to the peer's address.
It may seem to work when testing between two FRR instances, because FRR
loops back such packets, but no other implementation is supposed to do
that.
Let's warn users that the current implementation works only between two
FRR instances.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
when changing both ranges at the same time the order of the commands
matters, as we need to make sure that the intermediate state is valid.
This represents a problem when pushing configuration via frr-reload.
To fix this, the global-block command was extended to optionally
allow setting the local-block range as well. The local-block command
is deprecated with a 1-year notice.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Di Pascale <emanuele@voltanet.io>
* Clarify which commands are applicable to which flavors of LFA;
* Explain the default prefix priority for different prefix types;
* Rearrange some command descriptions so that they appear in this
order: local LFA, remote LFA and then TI-LFA.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
These don't need to be documented, most of the time they are obvious,
when they aren't the behavior can just be described in the command
description.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@nvidia.com>
- Generate index entries automatically
- Remove manual command index entries
- Clean up a few other manual index entries
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@nvidia.com>
Modify code to add JSON format output in show command.
"show ip igmp [vrf NAME] join" and "show ip igmp vrf all join" with proper formatting
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
People keep asking about the default unreachable route
in the linux vrf table. Add a bit of color about the
design choices and what is going on.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Modify code to add JSON format output in show command
"show ipv6 ospf6 interface prefix" with proper formating
Signed-off-by: Yash Ranjan <ranjany@vmware.com>
Modify code to add JSON format output in show command
"show ipv6 ospf6 route [<intra-area|inter-area|external-1|
external-2|X:X::X:X|X:X::X:X/M|detail|summary>]"
with proper formating
Signed-off-by: Yash Ranjan <ranjany@vmware.com>
The RFC 8212 changes keep being questioned. Update the documentation
a bit more to help the end user figure it out themselves?
At the very least I can just now quote the doc link for this section
when someone asks the question.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Implement the below 2 CLIs to clear the current data in the process
and neighbor data structure.
1. clear ip ospf process
2. clear ip ospf neighbor
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
The current securing BGP and resource certification reference links lead
to a page not found. This patch fixes that by pointing to their
corresponding PDF format resources.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Goncalves <cgoncalves@redhat.com>
Updated the documentation clarifying that multiple addresses can be
specifyed via -l option.
Signed-off-by: "Adriano Marto Reis" <adrianomarto@gmail.com>
This command has been added in the context of
PIM BSM functionality. This command will clear the
data structs having bsr information.
Co-authored-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: vishaldhingra <vdhingra@vmware.com>
This new dynamic module makes pathd behave as a PCC for dynamic candidate path
using the external library pcpelib https://github.com/volta-networks/pceplib .
The candidate paths defined as dynamic will trigger computation requests to the
configured PCE, and the PCE response will be used to update the policy.
It supports multiple PCE. The one with smaller precedence will be elected
as the master PCE, and only if the connection repeatedly fails, the PCC will
switch to another PCE.
Example of configuration:
segment-routing
traffic-eng
pcep
pce-config CONF
source-address ip 10.10.10.10
sr-draft07
!
pce PCE1
config CONF
address ip 1.1.1.1
!
pce PCE2
config CONF
address ip 2.2.2.2
!
pcc
peer PCE1 precedence 10
peer PCE2 precedence 20
!
!
!
!
Co-authored-by: Brady Johnson <brady@voltanet.io>
Co-authored-by: Emanuele Di Pascale <emanuele@voltanet.io>
Co-authored-by: GalaxyGorilla <sascha@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Javier Garcia <javier.garcia@voltanet.io>
Co-authored-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Co-authored-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
This new daemon manages Segment-Routing Traffic-Engineering
(SR-TE) Policies and installs them into zebra. It provides
the usual yang support and vtysh commands to define or change
SR-TE Policies.
In a nutshell SR-TE Policies provide the possibility to steer
traffic through a (possibly dynamic) list of Segment Routing
segments to the endpoint of the policy. This list of segments
is part of a Candidate Path which again belongs to the SR-TE
Policy. SR-TE Policies are uniquely identified by their color
and endpoint. The color can be used to e.g. match BGP
communities on incoming traffic.
There can be multiple Candidate Paths for a single
policy, the active Candidate Path is chosen according to
certain conditions of which the most important is its
preference. Candidate Paths can be explicit (fixed list of
segments) or dynamic (list of segment comes from e.g. PCEP, see
below).
Configuration example:
segment-routing
traffic-eng
segment-list SL
index 10 mpls label 1111
index 20 mpls label 2222
!
policy color 4 endpoint 10.10.10.4
name POL4
binding-sid 104
candidate-path preference 100 name exp explicit segment-list SL
candidate-path preference 200 name dyn dynamic
!
!
!
There is an important connection between dynamic Candidate
Paths and the overall topic of Path Computation. Later on for
pathd a dynamic module will be introduced that is capable
of communicating via the PCEP protocol with a PCE (Path
Computation Element) which again is capable of calculating
paths according to its local TED (Traffic Engineering Database).
This dynamic module will be able to inject the mentioned
dynamic Candidate Paths into pathd based on calculated paths
from a PCE.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-06
Co-authored-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Co-authored-by: GalaxyGorilla <sascha@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Emanuele Di Pascale <emanuele@voltanet.io>
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Some vendors only advertise EAD-per-ES routes i.e. they do not
advertise EAD-per-EVI routes. To interop with these vendors we need
to relax the dependancy on EAD-per-EVI routes to activate a remote ES-PE.
Sample config -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
router bgp 5553
address-family l2vpn evpn
disable-ead-evi-rx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ticket: CM-31177
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Update these two daemons to include the new
ability for both bgp and sharpd to send extra informational
data to zebra.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
