The adata variable was being leaked on shutdown since
it was calloc'ed. There is no need to make this dynamic
memory. Just choose a size and use that. Add a bit
of code to ensure that if it's not large enough,
it will just stop and the developer will fix it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
INTERFACE_NAMSIZ is just a redefine of IFNAMSIZ and IFNAMSIZ
is the standard for interface name length on all platforms
that FRR currently compiles on.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Effectively a massive search and replace of
`struct thread` to `struct event`. Using the
term `thread` gives people the thought that
this event system is a pthread when it is not
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This is a first in a series of commits, whose goal is to rename
the thread system in FRR to an event system. There is a continual
problem where people are confusing `struct thread` with a true
pthread. In reality, our entire thread.c is an event system.
In this commit rename the thread.[ch] files to event.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Rather than running selected source files through the preprocessor and a
bunch of perl regex'ing to get the list of all DEFUNs, use the data
collected in frr.xref.
This not only eliminates issues we've been having with preprocessor
failures due to nonexistent header files, but is also much faster.
Where extract.pl would take 5s, this now finishes in 0.2s. And since
this is a non-parallelizable build step towards the end of the build
(dependent on a lot of other things being done already), the speedup is
actually noticeable.
Also files containing CLI no longer need to be listed in `vtysh_scan`
since the .xref data covers everything. `#ifndef VTYSH_EXTRACT_PL`
checks are equally obsolete.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Section 6.2.7 of RFC 4861 states that a router SHOULD log
inconsistencies in RA information detected on a given link:
```
- Cur Hop Limit values (except for the unspecified value of zero
other inconsistencies SHOULD be logged to system network
management).
- Values of the M or O flags.
- Reachable Time values (except for the unspecified value of zero).
- Retrans Timer values (except for the unspecified value of zero).
- Values in the MTU options.
- Preferred and Valid Lifetimes for the same prefix. If
AdvPreferredLifetime and/or AdvValidLifetime decrement in real
time as specified in Section 6.2.1 then the comparison of the
lifetimes cannot compare the content of the fields in the Router
Advertisement, but must instead compare the time at which the
prefix will become deprecated and invalidated, respectively. Due
to link propagation delays and potentially poorly synchronized
clocks between the routers such comparison SHOULD allow some time
skew.
```
We were not logging inconsistencies if "the unspecified value of zero"
was used for Reachable Time but were logging them for Retrans Timer.
This updates the validation check to also skip the logging of Retrans
Timer inconsistencies if either local/rx value is 0.
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
When we process a received Router Advertisement we have some logic in
place to detect and log mismatches in a handful of flags/values.
However, these logs do not include what the actual values are, which
means it's up to the operator to grab a packet capture and compare that
against the local configuration...
So let's make life a little easier by including those in the log itself.
Before:
```
2022/09/30 20:37:16 ZEBRA: [KV2V1-7GM7G][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvCurHopLimit doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:feca:b085
2022/09/30 20:37:16 ZEBRA: [KS0BP-4GR8K][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvManagedFlag doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:feca:b085
2022/09/30 20:37:16 ZEBRA: [RE4EC-VYEJ2][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvOtherConfigFlag doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:feca:b085
2022/09/30 20:37:16 ZEBRA: [X6794-9MW18][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvReachableTime doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:feca:b085
2022/09/30 20:37:16 ZEBRA: [S1KXC-H8F4W][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvRetransTimer doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:feca:b085
```
After:
```
Sep 30 20:45:18 ub20-2 zebra[47487]: [GSW5Z-V7DZN][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvCurHopLimit (14) doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:fe9a:e2ca (64)
Sep 30 20:45:18 ub20-2 zebra[47487]: [RHHTS-F96DR][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvManagedFlag (0) doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:fe9a:e2ca (1)
Sep 30 20:45:18 ub20-2 zebra[47487]: [MNBY3-FTN6W][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvOtherConfigFlag (0) doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:fe9a:e2ca (1)
Sep 30 20:45:18 ub20-2 zebra[47487]: [GG62B-XXWR0][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvReachableTime (20) doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:fe9a:e2ca (777)
Sep 30 20:45:18 ub20-2 zebra[47487]: [YG220-D6B4H][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvRetransTimer (13) doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:fe9a:e2ca (0)
```
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
The creation of the rtadv socket can fail but there
is very very little data associated with this event
to let the operator know something has gone terribly
wrong.
Please note if this socket fails to create or fails
the setsockopt's rtadv is basically just really really
messed up. I am not sure what can be done here.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When a interface is configured with this:
int eva
ipv6 nd ra-interval 5
no ipv6 nd suppress-ra
!
And then subsuquently the interface is created and brought up, FRR
would both error on joining the RA multicast address and never
properly work in this state.
Delay the startup of the join and start of the Router Advertisements
until after the ifindex has actually been found.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Move a few things into places they actually belong, and reduce the
number of places we have `#ifdev HAVE_RTADV`. Just overall code
prettification.
... I had actually done this quite a while ago while doing some other
random hacking and thought it more useful to not be sitting on it on my
disk...
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
It's confusing for a user to see 'Tx RA failed' in the logs when
they've enabled RAs (either through interface config or BGP unnumbered)
on an interface that can't send them. Let's avoid sending RAs on
interfaces that are bridge_slaves or don't have a link-local address,
since they are the two of the most common reasons for RA Tx failures.
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
Add to `show zebra` whether or not RA is compiled into FRR
and whether or not BGP is using RFC 5549 at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
RA packets are pretty chatty and when there is a warning from
a missconfiguration on the network, the log file gets filed
up with warnings. Modify the code in rtadv.c to only spit
out the warning in these cases at most every 6 hours.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Since f60a1188 we store a pointer to the VRF in the interface structure.
There's no need anymore to store a separate vrf_id field.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
We should always treat the VRF interface as a loopback. Currently, this
is not the case, because in some old pre-VRF code we use if_is_loopback
instead of if_is_loopback_or_vrf. To avoid any future problems, the
proposal is to rename if_is_loopback_or_vrf to if_is_loopback and use it
everywhere. if_is_loopback is renamed to if_is_loopback_exact in case
it's ever needed, but currently it's not used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
In the rtadv_timer(), it always uses the zvrf's socket to send RA
packets. In the vrf-lite mode, it's righ since it uses the default
vrf to send the RA packets. But in the netns mode, it uses socket
in each netns. So the issue only happens in the netns mode because
the zvrf's socket may not be in the same netns as the interface's
netns. In order to compatible with both vrf-lite and netns mode,
the fix uses the if_lookup_by_index() to check whether interfaces
can use the zvrf's socket.
Signed-off-by: LEI BAO <bali.baolei@cn.ibm.com>
There's a helper function to check whether the interface is loopback or
VRF - if_is_loopback_or_vrf. Let's use it whenever we need to check that.
There's no functional change in this commit.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
