Add a switchover test that consists in shutting down an interface.
Check that the switchover between primary and backup happens before the
SPF re-computation.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
If ISIS is running on an IPv6 only topology, the command "spf interval"
has no effect.
Only the IPv4 SPF tree timers are taken into account.
Base the next SPF scheduling on the last running SPF tree.
Fixes: be985ba059 ("isisd: make use of advanced concepts like arrays and loops")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Add a switchover test that consists in:
- Setting up ISIS BFD between rt5 and rt6
- Setting no link-detect on rt6 eth-rt5 so that zebra does not take
account linkdown events on this interface.
- Shutting down rt6 eth-rt5 from the switch side
Check that the switchover between primary and backup happens before the
SPF re-computation.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Add a switchover test that consists in shutting down an interface.
Check that the switchover between primary and backup happens before the
SPF re-computation.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
isis_ifp_down() may in some circumstances be called twice on a down
interface event.
Avoid applying fast-reroute on an already down interface.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
When an IS-IS interface is coming down, fast-reroute may be triggered
twice: a first time after the detection of the interface down event and
a second time after the detection of the adjacency down (because of the
expiration of the ISIS Hello or BFD timers).
Avoid a BFD down event from running fast-reroute another time if the
interface was already detected down.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
As of now we are logging only JSON output of CLIs
in topotests(topojson) executions and same o/p is
getting printed twice, which is of no use.
Enhanced code to show both plain and JSON output
of CLIs and remove duplicate logging.
It will help in reducing execution logs and in
verification, if sometimes there is mis-match
in CLI plain and JSON outputs.
Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Kashyap <kashyapk@vmware.com>
This test is sometimes failing under severe load. Give some time
for the linux rule installation to actually be registered by the
system before declaring failure.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Backup routes are sent to zebra by routing daemons such as isisd so that
the dataplane can pre-install them with a lower priority. When an
interface comes down, the associated primary routes are discarded by the
dataplane and the backup ones take over.
However, some dataplanes (e.g. Netlink ones) do not pre-install the
backup routes. Associated prefixes have no next-hop until SPF is
recomputed.
Apply fast-reroute as soon as an interface falls down by sending route
UPDATEs to zebra.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Seems replacement is not working when referenced, only when used directly
in the text |PACKAGE_URL|.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Allow the nexthoplookup function to return the first nexthop found on
ifindex interface if the IP is unspecified.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
When a adjacency falls down, the primary routes are not deleted on the
dataplane until the SPF is recomputed. Even the backup routes are
pre-installed on the dataplane, there is no fast-route optimization.
Reasons for an adjacency to come down are:
- BFD down
- Hello timer timeout
- User adjacency clear
Apply the backup route switchover for fast-reroute as soon an IS-IS
adjacency falls down before the first SPF re-computation. Pre-computed
backup routes are applied sooner.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Move a few things into places they actually belong, and reduce the
number of places we have `#ifdev HAVE_RTADV`. Just overall code
prettification.
... I had actually done this quite a while ago while doing some other
random hacking and thought it more useful to not be sitting on it on my
disk...
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Allowing only 4 seconds for a bfd test to synchronize is going
to run into problems on extremely loaded systems. The test
system should value it actually converged over it actually
converged in a reasonable time, especially on test systems
that are loaded because of many multiples of tests running
at the same time. If it is important to actually test
that something got done by the RFC, the CI system as it
is currently written is not the correct place for this.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Under heavy load I am seeing verify_rib failing after 12 seconds
but succeeding after 17:
2022-05-19 18:52:54,374 DEBUG: topolog: Exiting lib API: verify_rib
2022-05-19 18:52:54,374 DEBUG: topolog: Function returned True
2022-05-19 18:52:54,374 WARNING: topolog: RETRY DIAGNOSTIC: SUCCEED after FAILED with requested timeout of 12.0s; however, succeeded in 14.7s, investigate timeout timing
There is no reason to not have the test wait a bit longer for very very
heavily loaded systems. Change the time to 40 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Lots of tests call verify_rib that takes a list of routes that
need to be verified in some fashion. This verify_rib functionality
will try up to 12 seconds before failing the check that zebra
has the route and has installed it.
Unfortunately the verify_rib code was not looking to see if
the route was queued for installation and was then allowing
tests to immediately do subsuquent steps that depended on
that route actually being installed sometimes causing tests
to fail.
Write a bit of additional code that looks at the queued
status and allows the test to wait a bit longer for zebra
to finish processing before allowing the test to move on
to the next bit.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
a) Remove setting of thread pointer to NULL after
thread invocation, this is already done.
b) Use thread_is_scheduled()
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The ospf6_is_valid_summary_addr function is checking
to see if a prefix is the default and also then double
comparing it against the v6 prefix part. No need to do this.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The parent node of "vrf" MUST be non-NULL, so the check is unnecessary and
misleading. Otherwise, there will be a branch of NULL parent node, it makes
no sense, remove it.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
As described by
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-spaghetti-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-04.html
Since this replicates the HoldTime check on the receiver that is already
part of the protocol, I do not believe it necessary to wait for IETF
progress on this draft. It's just replicating an existing element of
the protocol at the other side of the session.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
