Handle matching type2/5 evpn routes via lookup in the optimized
route-maps used by plists.
Convert the evpn_prefix to ipv4/v6 prefix to perform longest
matching on in the tree.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
Implement the ability to match type-2 and type-5 routes
via a route-map and a prefix-list.
Add some library code to convert an evpn prefix into
a general ipv4/ipv6 prefix for type-2 and type-5 routes.
evpn prefix is really just another subtype of prefix so all
the info needed can be extracted right there.
Add a special handler to bgp_routemap for evpn type routes
when applying the outbound route-map. This calls the library
code to convert the evpn_prefix to a ipv4/ipv6 prefix and
run it through the plist code. In this we assume type-2 routes
are a /32.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
Add route-map as a possible word for the `no` form
of `advertise ipvX *** [route-map WORD] cmd.
Before this patch the cmd was only accepted if `no` form
was given without route-map WORD. So if you just copypaste
the original version of the cmd, it would fail.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
Implement forcing L3 auto derivation via configs even when
manually RTs are set. This will allow both to coexist in
BGP RTs. Without using auto config command, it will remove
auto derived RTs when you manually configure your own. To allow
both, use the auto command ond import/export/both.
Implement '*' wildcard import L3 RTs so we can import a route into any AS.
This is necessary to avoid a user from having to configure an L3 RT for
every AS they care to import evpn route from.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
Abstract the ecommunity into a container struct for L3
route targets so that we can add some additional info
via flags to go along with RT configs without modifying
the used elsewhere ecommunity struct. This functions as a
wrapper everywhere its used including the import/export lists.
The flags will be used in later commits to change behavior
when importing/exporting routes.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
IPv4 and IPv6 behaves a little bit differently with the socket
options.
IPPROTO_RAW socket option is only for IPv4.
Therefore the register packet was not properly getting encapculated
for PIMv6 and was working fine for PIMv4.
So have used IPPROTO_PIM for PIMv6.
Fixes: #11846
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
Add functionality to allow EVPN L3 RTs to be configured via
a list rather than one at a time.
Also add boilerplate config for forcing auto derivation of RTs
via config.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
BGP SoO is a tag that is appended on BGP updates to allow a peer to mark
a particular peer as belonging to a particular site. In certain MPLS L3 VPN
configurations, the BGP AS-Path may not provide the granularity needed
prevent a loop in the control-plane. With this in mind, BGP SoO is designed
to fill this gap and prevent a routing loop that may occur.
If we configure for example, `neighbor soo 65000:1` at PEs, routes won't be
announced between CPEs if soo matches. This is especially needed when using
as-override or allowas-in.
Also, this is the automated way of the same behavior as configuring route-maps
for each peer like:
```
bgp extcommunity-list cpe permit soo 65000:1
!
route-map cpe permit 10
set extcommunity soo 65000:1
...
route-map cpe deny 10
match extcommunity cpe
route-map cpe permit 20
...
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Fix issue #11839.
When the user defines a range in an area other than the backbone area, the
summary route will be announced to the backbone area as an inter-area LSA.
However, if the prefix defined in the range is the same prefix as a connected
route in that area, the LSA won't be announced to the backbone area.
This is because when ospf6d is originating the summary route for the
intra-area route, it finds the range configured by the user and tries to
suppress the route by deleting the existing summary route, which happens to be
the one created by the range.
Although the range definition is not necessary in this case, it should not
fail this use case. So let's just keep the summary route there if it is
created from the user defined range.
Signed-off-by: Xiaodong Xu <stid.smth@gmail.com>
FRR only needs lua library (package libluaX.Y-dev) to be compiled and
linked, but its `configure` script makes use of lua interpreter to
perform its checks. Therefore, `luaX.Y` package is a requisite
build-dependency for debian packaging.
This commit adds the debian package with the lua interpreter to the
build dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Crosser <crosser@average.org>
Whn using as-override, we should be able to deny outgoing updates from
being propogated when `neighbor soo` is configured.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
In kernel_socket.c, the code is deleting and then adding
the route back in on a change operation. This just translates
too two re's, one for deletion and one for addition. The deletion
will just be ignored. Let's not do the extra deletion.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The new route code path was using a combination of
both rib_add() and rib_add_multipath() let's clean
it up some to use rib_add_multipath()
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Currently if an operator does this operation:
sharpd@eva ~/frr8> sudo ip nexthop add id 5000 via 192.168.119.44 dev enp39s0 ; sudo ip route add 10.0.0.1 nhid 5000
2022/06/30 08:52:40 ZEBRA: [ZHQK5-J9M1R] proto2zebra: Please add this protocol(0) to proper rt_netlink.c handling
2022/06/30 08:52:40 ZEBRA: [PS16P-365FK][EC 4043309076] Zebra failed to find the nexthop hash entry for id=5000 in a route entry
sharpd@eva ~/frr8> vtysh -c "show ip route 10.0.0.1"
Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0
Known via "kernel", distance 0, metric 100, best
Last update 00:01:58 ago
* 192.168.119.1, via enp39s0
The route is dropped by zebra with no warnings. This is not good,
but unlikely to happen at this point in time. In order to fix
this issue route processing from inputs needs to happen after nexthop
group processing from inputs. This was not possible because
nexthop groups are placed on the metaQ. As such the above
nexthop group creation is placed on the metaQ for processing
in META_QUEUE_NHG. Then the route is read in and processed
immediately. The nexthop group is not found ( not processed yet!)
and the route is dropped in zebra.
Modify the code to have early route processing of validity
on the MetaQ. This preserves the order of operations.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Convert label processing that comes from zapi messages
into being handled by the meta-Q. This is because early
route processing is going to be moved to the meta-Q as
well and we will have a chicken and egg problem without
moving this code to be processed by the meta-Q.
Ordering of messages from ospf as an example:
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:48] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:48] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:48] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:48] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:62] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:43] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:61] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE:0:66] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE:0:47] comes from socket [36]
The ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE immediately turn around and attempt to replace nexthop labels on routes that
were added. If the route add is placed on the metaQ, it will not exist yet and as such the label replace
will fail.
Modify the zebra code to take the label operations and place them on the metaQ as well.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
