With this commit:
1) The code to manage the large-communities attribute of the routes that are
aggregatable under a configured aggregate-address is introduced.
2) The code to compute the aggregate-route's large-communities attribute is
introduced.
Signed-off-by: NaveenThanikachalam <nthanikachal@vmware.com>
With this commit:
1) The code to manage the extended-communities attribute of the routes that are
aggregatable under a configured aggregate-address is introduced.
2) The code to compute the aggregate-route's extended-communities attribute is
introduced.
Signed-off-by: NaveenThanikachalam <nthanikachal@vmware.com>
With this commit:
1) The code to manage the communities attribute of the routes that are
aggregatable under a configured aggregate-address is introduced.
2) The code to compute the aggregate-route's communities attribute is
introduced.
Signed-off-by: NaveenThanikachalam <nthanikachal@vmware.com>
With this commit:
1) 'struct bgp_aggregate' is moved to bgp_route.h from bgp_route.c
2) Hashes to accommodate the as-path, communities, extended-communities and
large-communities attributes of all the routes aggregated by an
aggregate route is introduced in 'struct bgp_aggregate'.
3) Place-holders for the aggregate route's as-path, communities,
extended-communities and large-communities attributes are introduced in
'struct bgp_aggregate'.
4) The code to manage the as-path of the routes that are aggregatable under
a configured aggregate-address is introduced.
5) The code to compute the aggregate-route's as-path is introduced.
Signed-off-by: NaveenThanikachalam <nthanikachal@vmware.com>
Refine check on whether a route can be injected into EVPN to allow
EVPN-sourced routes to be injected back into another instance.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The check on which routes are exportable is a superset, so remove the
route sub-type checks. Also, this change is needed to handle EVPN-imported
leaked routes correctly.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
IPv4 or IPv6 unicast routes which are imported from EVPN routes
(type-2 or type-5) and installed in a BGP instance and then leaked
do not need any nexthop tracking, as any tracking should happen in
the source instance.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
A non-imported route or a non-VPN imported route is a candidate to be
exported into the VPN routing table for leaking to other BGP instances
or advertisement into BGP/MPLS VPN. The former is a local or learnt
IPv4 or IPv6 route. The latter is an IPv4 or IPv6 route that is based
on a received EVPN type-2 or type-5 route.
Implement a function to specify if a route can be exported into VPN
and use in the appropriate places.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
IPv4 or IPv6 unicast routes which are imported from EVPN routes
(type-2 or type-5) and installed in a BGP instance can be leaked
to another instance.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
In the case of EVPN symmetric routing, the tenant VRF is associated with
a VNI that is used for routing and commonly referred to as the L3 VNI or
VRF VNI. Corresponding to this VNI is a VLAN and its associated L3 (IP)
interface (SVI). Overlay next hops (i.e., next hops for routes in the
tenant VRF) are reachable over this interface. Howver, in the model that
is supported in the implementation and commonly deployed, there is no
explicit Overlay IP address associated with the next hop in the tenant
VRF; the underlay IP is used if (since) the forwarding plane requires
a next hop IP. Therefore, the next hop has to be explicit flagged as
onlink to cause any next hop reachability checks in the forwarding plane
to be skipped.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement
section 4.4 provides additional description of the above constructs.
Use existing mechanism to specify the nexthops as onlink when installing
these routes from bgpd to zebra and get rid of a special flag that was
introduced for EVPN-sourced routes. Also, use the onlink flag during next
hop validation in zebra and eliminate other special checks.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
In the case of EVPN symmetric routing, the tenant VRF is associated with
a VNI that is used for routing and commonly referred to as the L3 VNI or
VRF VNI. Corresponding to this VNI is a VLAN and its associated L3 (IP)
interface (SVI). Overlay next hops (i.e., next hops for routes in the
tenant VRF) are reachable over this interface.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement
section 4.4 provides additional description of the above constructs.
Use the L3 interface exchanged between zebra and bgp in route install.
This patch in conjunction with the earlier one helps to eliminate some
special code in zebra to derive the next hop's interface.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
In the case of EVPN symmetric routing, the tenant VRF is associated with
a VNI that is used for routing and commonly referred to as the L3 VNI or
VRF VNI. Corresponding to this VNI is a VLAN and its associated L3 (IP)
interface (SVI). Overlay next hops (i.e., next hops for routes in the
tenant VRF) are reachable over this interface.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement
section 4.4 provides additional description of the above constructs.
The implementation currently derives this L3 interface for EVPN tenant
routes using special code that looks at route flags. This patch
exchanges the L3 interface between zebra and bgpd as part of the L3-VNI
exchange in order to eliminate some this special code.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When a IPv4 or IPv6 route that was formerly allowed by the route-map
to be injected into EVPN gets an updated set of attributes that now
causes it to be filtered, the route needs to be pulled out of EVPN.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Withdraw flag is not sufficient to call bgp_update vs. bgp_withdraw()
processing for a given BGP evpn update message.
When a bgp update needs to be treated as an implicit withdraw
(e.g., due to malformed attribute), the code wasn't handling
things properly.
Rearranging attribute pass field to type-5 route processing and aligning
similar to done for other routes (type2/type-3).
Ticket:CM-24003
Reviewed By:CCR-8330
Testing Done:
Singed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@cumulusnetworks.com>
A few code paths weren't handling the vpnv6 nexthop lenghts as
expected, which was leading to problems like imported vpnv6 routes
not being marked as valid when they should. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
BGP IPv6 routes should never contain the NEXT_HOP attribute
(MP_REACH_NLRI should be used instead).
This reverts commit 75cd35c697.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Add some Coccinelle semantic patches we can use to automatically
refactor code in the future.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
Discovered in testing that if a static route in the default table
was entered immediately after a vrf static block, the static route
intended for the default table was put in the vrf instead. This
fix retains the "exit-vrf" statement which causes the following
static routes to appear in the default table correctly.
Ticket: CM-23985
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetwork.com>
Problem caused when nclu is used to create "ip route 1.1.1.0/24
blackhole" because frr-reload.py changed the line to Null0 instead
of blackhole. If nclu tries to delete it using the same line as
entered, the commit fails since it doesn't match.
Ticket: CM-23986
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
