These are in packed structs at weird offsets (e.g. 2 bytes), and as such
need a memcpy to get them into proper alignment.
It'd be even better if the pimd code used proper de/serialization, but
let's get this improved one step at a time.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
For pim callbacks, we pass pim_addr as value, not pointer.
So making it consistent for pim_nht callbacks.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Added this api to fill all multicast group address based on IP version.
For PIMv4 its 224.0.0.0/4, for PIMv6 its FF00::0/8.
Changed the code where its being used currently.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
We can use PIMADDR_ANY instead of INADDR_NONE to initalize rp->rpf_addr
when there is no rp configured for group_all.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Since `pim_sgaddr` is `pim_addr` now, that causes a whole lot of fallout
anywhere S,G pairs are handled.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
In all places that pim_nht_bsr_del is called, the code
needs to not unregister if the current_bsr is INADDR_ANY.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
I'm now seeing in my log file:
2022/01/28 11:20:05 PIM: [Q0PZ7-QBBN3] attempting to delete nonexistent NHT BSR entry 0.0.0.0
2022/01/28 11:20:05 PIM: [Q0PZ7-QBBN3] attempting to delete nonexistent NHT BSR entry 0.0.0.0
2022/01/28 11:20:06 PIM: [Q0PZ7-QBBN3] attempting to delete nonexistent NHT BSR entry 0.0.0.0
When I run pimd. Looking at the code there are 3 places where pim_bsm.c removes the
NHT BSR tracking. In 2 of them the code ensures that the address is already setup
in 1 place it is not. Fix.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Replaces comparison against INADDR_ANY, so we can do IPv6 too.
(Renamed from "pim_is_addr_any" for "pim_addr_*" naming pattern, and
type fixed to bool.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Problem Statement:
==================
on rp_change, PIM processes all the upstream in a loop and for selected
upstreams PIM has to send join/prune based on the RPF changed.
join and prune packets are not getting aggregated in a single packet.
Root Cause Analysis:
====================
on pim_rp_change pim_upstream_update() gets called for selected upstreams.
This API calculates to whom it has to send join and to whom it has to
send prune via API pim_zebra_upstream_rpf_changed(). This API peprares
the upstream_switch_list list per interface and inserts the group and
sources.
Now PIM is still in the pim_upstream_update() API context, i.e PIM
is still processing the same upstream. In the last there is a
call to pim_zebra_update_all_interfaces() which processes the
upstream_switch_list list, sends the packets out and clears the list.
Fix:
====
Don't process the upstream_switch_list in the upstream context.
process all the upstreams prepare the upstream_switch_list and then
process in one go. This will club all the S,G entries.
It also saves list cleanup with respect to memory allocation and
deallocation multiple times.
Signed-off-by: Vishal Dhingra <rac.vishaldhingra@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
rp-count==0 isn't a broken BSM, it just means the BSR no longer has any
Candidate RPs for the group range. Previous behavior is badly mistaken
since it stops processing the entire packet.
Fix to correctly remove group range on rp-count==0 and continue
processing remainder of the packet.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
... where it actually belongs. And make a bunch of stuff static, since
it's no longer used across files now.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
The Bootstrap message RX path needs a RPF check for the BSR address,
and this is implemented both incorrectly as well as quite ugly.
Clean up and fix case when we have multiple interfaces to the same LAN
and/or ECMP nexthops (both would cause message duplication, the former
can even cause BSM forwarding loops.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Most users of if_lookup_address_exact only cared about whether the
address is any local address. Split that off into a separate function.
For the users that actually need the ifp - which I'm about to add a few
of - change it to prefer returning interfaces that are UP.
(Function name changed due to slight change in behavior re. UP state, to
avoid possible bugs from this change.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
pimd's include files are very interdependent. Let's chop that down a
bit to gain some flexibility.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
When we decide that we do not need a item on the partial_bsrp_list
don't just drop the memory on the floor, free it up.
This was happening when we decided that a pending item has
a hold time of 0.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
VRF creation can happen from either cli or from
knowledged about the vrf learned from zebra.
In the case where we learn about the vrf from
the cli, the vrf id is UNKNOWN. Upon actual
creation of the vrf, lib/vrf.c touches up the vrf_id
and calls pim_vrf_enable to turn it on properly.
At this point in time we have a pim->vrf_id of
UNKNOWN and the vrf->vrf_id of the right value.
There is no point in duplicating this data. So just
remove all pim->vrf_id and use the vrf->vrf_id instead
since we keep a copy of the pim->vrf pointer.
This will remove some crashes where we expect the
pim->vrf_id to be usable and it's not.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Just some cleanup before I touch this code; switching to typesafe list
macros & putting the data directly inline.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Back when I put this together in 2015, ISO C11 was still reasonably new
and we couldn't require it just yet. Without ISO C11, there is no
"good" way (only bad hacks) to require a semicolon after a macro that
ends with a function definition. And if you added one anyway, you'd get
"spurious semicolon" warnings on some compilers...
With C11, `_Static_assert()` at the end of a macro will make it so that
the semicolon is properly required, consumed, and not warned about.
Consistently requiring semicolons after "file-level" macros matches
Linux kernel coding style and helps some editors against mis-syntax'ing
these macros.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
This command has been added in the context of
PIM BSM functionality. This command will clear the
data structs having bsr information.
Co-authored-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: vishaldhingra <vdhingra@vmware.com>
