Leaked recursive routes are not resolved.
> VRF r1-cust1:
> B> 5.1.0.0/24 [200/98] via 99.0.0.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:08
> * via 192.168.1.2, r1-eth4, weight 1, 00:00:08
> B>* 99.0.0.1/32 [200/0] via 192.168.1.2, r1-eth4, weight 1, 00:00:08
> VRF r1-cust4:
> B 5.1.0.0/24 [20/98] via 99.0.0.1 (vrf r1-cust1) inactive, weight 1, 00:00:08
> B>* 99.0.0.1/32 [20/0] via 192.168.1.2, r1-eth4 (vrf r1-cust1), weight 1, 00:00:08
When announcing the routes to zebra, use the peer of the ultimate bgp
path info instead of the one of the first parent path info to determine
whether the route is recursive.
The result is:
> VRF r1-cust4:
> B> 5.1.0.0/24 [20/98] via 99.0.0.1 (vrf r1-cust1) (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
> * via 192.168.1.2, r1-eth4 (vrf r1-cust1), weight 1, 00:00:02
> B>* 99.0.0.1/32 [20/0] via 192.168.1.2, r1-eth4 (vrf r1-cust1), weight 1, 00:00:02
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Include gtsm_hops (minttl) field when copying peer structure,
so that a new connection could set a proper value.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Skorichenko <askorichenko@netgate.com>
When a BGP flowspec peering stops, the BGP RIB entries for IPv6
flowspec entries are removed, but not the ZEBRA RIB IPv6 entries.
Actually, when calling bgp_zebra_withdraw() function call, only
the AFI_IP parameter is passed to the bgp_pbr_update_entry() function
in charge of the Flowspec add/delete in zebra. Fix this by passing
the AFI parameter to the bgp_zebra_withdraw() function.
Note that using topotest does not show up the problem as the
flowspec driver code is not present and was refused. Without that,
routes are not installed, and can not be uninstalled.
Fixes: 529efa2346 ("bgpd: allow flowspec entries to be announced to zebra")
Link: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/2025
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
By default, iBGP and eBGP-OAD peers exchange RPKI extended community by default.
Add a command to disable sending RPKI extended community if needed.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
98efa5bc6b ("bgpd: bgp_path_info_extra memory optimization") has removed
SID info from the extra structure.
Do not test for extra presence.
Fixes: 98efa5bc6b ("bgpd: bgp_path_info_extra memory optimization")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Since we have a knob to disable sending FQDN capability, it MUST be checked
before sending it using dynamic capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
As far as I can tell, the rpki code creates a pthread that
is used to handle the i/o associated with talking to the
remote rpki server. The problem that we are having is that
the rpki code in FRR wants to behave like FRR code and use
the zlog_XXX functions. These functions all depend on
the RCU code. Which is a bit picky( and rightly so!!! )
about being started up properly and shut down properly.
This commit is fixing the problem of shutdown. From
playing with the rpki code, I was able to experimentally
determine that the rpki_create_socket callback function
can be called multiple times per pthread. Additionally
I was able to clearly see multiple *different* pthreads
actually be created. This leaves the possiblity
that each time it is called it might be hooking into the
RCU code. Which makes the rcu code unhappy on shutdown.
Let's address the issue by checking to see if this pthread
has already hooked into the RCU code or not. If so
then don't do this again.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
cisco routers are not dealing fairly whith unsupported capabilities.
When a cisco router receive an unsupported capabilities it reset the
negociation without notifying the unmatching capability as described in
RFC2842.
Cisco suggest the use of
neighbor x.x.x.x capability fqdn
to avoid the use of fqdn in open message.
this new command is to remove the use of fqdn capability in the
open message with the peer "x.x.x.x".
Link: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/116189-problemsolution-technology-00.pdf
Signed-off-by: Francois Dumontet <francois.dumontet@6wind.com>
Fix the following crash when logging from rpki_create_socket():
> #0 raise (sig=<optimized out>) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
> #1 0x00007f6e21723798 in core_handler (signo=6, siginfo=0x7f6e1e502ef0, context=0x7f6e1e502dc0) at lib/sigevent.c:248
> #2 <signal handler called>
> #3 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
> #4 0x00007f6e2144e537 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
> #5 0x00007f6e2176348e in _zlog_assert_failed (xref=0x7f6e2180c920 <_xref.16>, extra=0x0) at lib/zlog.c:670
> #6 0x00007f6e216b1eda in rcu_read_lock () at lib/frrcu.c:294
> #7 0x00007f6e21762da8 in vzlog_notls (xref=0x0, prio=2, fmt=0x7f6e217afe50 "%s:%d: %s(): assertion (%s) failed", ap=0x7f6e1e504248) at lib/zlog.c:425
> #8 0x00007f6e217632fb in vzlogx (xref=0x0, prio=2, fmt=0x7f6e217afe50 "%s:%d: %s(): assertion (%s) failed", ap=0x7f6e1e504248) at lib/zlog.c:627
> #9 0x00007f6e217621f5 in zlog (prio=2, fmt=0x7f6e217afe50 "%s:%d: %s(): assertion (%s) failed") at lib/zlog.h:73
> #10 0x00007f6e21763596 in _zlog_assert_failed (xref=0x7f6e2180c920 <_xref.16>, extra=0x0) at lib/zlog.c:687
> #11 0x00007f6e216b1eda in rcu_read_lock () at lib/frrcu.c:294
> #12 0x00007f6e21762da8 in vzlog_notls (xref=0x7f6e21a50040 <_xref.68>, prio=4, fmt=0x7f6e21a4999f "getaddrinfo: debug", ap=0x7f6e1e504878) at lib/zlog.c:425
> #13 0x00007f6e217632fb in vzlogx (xref=0x7f6e21a50040 <_xref.68>, prio=4, fmt=0x7f6e21a4999f "getaddrinfo: debug", ap=0x7f6e1e504878) at lib/zlog.c:627
> #14 0x00007f6e21a3f774 in zlog_ref (xref=0x7f6e21a50040 <_xref.68>, fmt=0x7f6e21a4999f "getaddrinfo: debug") at ./lib/zlog.h:84
> #15 0x00007f6e21a451b2 in rpki_create_socket (_cache=0x55729149cc30) at bgpd/bgp_rpki.c:1337
> #16 0x00007f6e2120e7b7 in tr_tcp_open (tr_socket=0x5572914d1520) at rtrlib/rtrlib/transport/tcp/tcp_transport.c:111
> #17 0x00007f6e2120e212 in tr_open (socket=0x5572914b5e00) at rtrlib/rtrlib/transport/transport.c:16
> #18 0x00007f6e2120faa2 in rtr_fsm_start (rtr_socket=0x557290e17180) at rtrlib/rtrlib/rtr/rtr.c:130
> #19 0x00007f6e218b7ea7 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:477
> #20 0x00007f6e21527a2f in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:95
rpki_create_socket() is a hook function called from the rtrlib library.
The issue arises because rtrlib initiates its own separate pthread in which
it runs the hook, which does not establish an FRR RCU context. Consequently,
this leads to failures in the logging mechanism that relies on RCU.
Initialize a new FRR pthread context from the rtrlib pthread with a
valid RCU context to allow logging from the rpki_create_socket() and
dependent functions.
Link: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/15260
Fixes: a951752d4a ("bgpd: create cache server socket in vrf")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Create a single registry of default port values that daemons
are using. Most of these are vty ports, but there are some
others for features like ospfapi and zebra FPM.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@labn.net>
Structure size of bgp_path_info_extra when compiled
with vnc is 184 bytes. Reduce this size to 72 bytes
when compiled w/ vnc but not necessarily turned
on vnc.
With 2 full bgp feeds this saves aproximately 100mb
when compiling with vnc and not using vnc.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Leaked routes from prefixes defined with 'network <prefix>' are inactive
because they have no valid nexthop interface.
> vrf r1-cust1
> ip route 172.16.29.0/24 192.168.1.2
> router bgp 5227 vrf r1-cust1
> no bgp network import-check
> address-family ipv4 unicast
> network 172.16.29.0/24
> rd vpn export 10:1
> rt vpn import 52:100
> rt vpn export 52:101
> export vpn
> import vpn
> exit-address-family
> exit
> !
> router bgp 5227 vrf r1-cust4
> bgp router-id 192.168.1.1
> !
> address-family ipv4 unicast
> network 192.0.2/24
> rd vpn export 10:1
> rt vpn import 52:101
> rt vpn export 52:100
> export vpn
> import vpn
> exit-address-family
> exit
Extract from the routing table:
> VRF r1-cust1:
> S>* 172.16.29.0/24 [1/0] via 192.168.1.2, r1-eth4, weight 1, 00:47:53
>
> VRF r1-cust4:
> B 172.16.29.0/24 [20/0] is directly connected, unknown (vrf r1-cust1) inactive, weight 1, 00:03:40
Routes imported through the "network" command, as opposed to those
redistributed from the routing table, do not associate with any specific
interface.
When leaking prefix from other VRFs, if the route was imported from the
network statement (ie. static sub-type), set nh_ifindex to the index of
the VRF master interface of the incoming BGP instance.
The result is:
> VRF r1-cust4:
> B>* 172.16.29.0/24 [20/0] is directly connected, r1-cust1 (vrf r1-cust1), weight 1, 00:00:08
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
In bgp_adj_in_set(), attr has not yet been interned. adj->attr is always
different from attr. adj->attr is always uninterned and interned even if
attr and adj->attr are identical.
Fix the comparison.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Without this change when we change the route-map, we never reinstall the route
if the route-map has changed.
We checked only some attributes like aspath, communities, large-communities,
extended-communities, but ignoring the rest of attributes.
With this change, let's check if the route-map has changed.
bgp_route_map_process_update() is triggered on route-map change, and we set
`changed` to true, which treats aggregated route as not the same as it was before.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
The following configuration creates an infinite routing leaking loop
because 'rt vpn both' parameters are the same in both VRFs.
> router bgp 5227 vrf r1-cust4
> no bgp network import-check
> bgp router-id 192.168.1.1
> address-family ipv4 unicast
> network 28.0.0.0/24
> rd vpn export 10:12
> rt vpn both 52:100
> import vpn
> export vpn
> exit-address-family
> !
> router bgp 5227 vrf r1-cust5
> no bgp network import-check
> bgp router id 192.168.1.1
> address-family ipv4 unicast
> network 29.0.0.0/24
> rd vpn export 10:13
> rt vpn both 52:100
> import vpn
> export vpn
> exit-address-family
The previous commit has added a routing leak update when a nexthop
update is received from zebra. It indirectly calls
bgp_find_or_add_nexthop() in which a static route triggers a nexthop
cache entry registration that triggers a nexthop update from zebra.
Do not register again the nexthop cache entry if the BGP_STATIC_ROUTE is
already set.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
If 'bgp network import-check' is defined on the source BGP session,
prefixes that are defined with the network command cannot be leaked to
the other VRFs BGP table even if they are present in the origin VRF RIB
if the 'rt import' statement is defined after the 'network <prefix>'
ones.
When a prefix nexthop is updated, update the prefix route leaking. The
current state of nexthop validation is now stored in the attributes of
the bgp path info. Attributes are compared with the previous ones at
route leaking update so that a nexthop validation change now triggers
the update of destination VRF BGP table.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
"if not XX else" statements are confusing.
Replace two "if not XX else" statements by "if XX else" to prepare next
commits. The patch is only cosmetic.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
If 'bgp network import-check' is defined on the source BGP session,
prefixes that are defined with the network command cannot be leaked to
the other VRFs BGP table even if they are present in the origin VRF RIB.
Always validate the nexthop of BGP static routes (i.e. defined with the
network statement) if 'network import-check' is defined on the source
BGP session and the prefix is present in source RIB.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
