Before:
```
$ vtysh -c 'show bgp l2vpn evpn route detail json'
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< empty line
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< empty line
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< empty line
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< empty line
{
...
"numPrefix":4,
"numPaths":4 <<<<< four paths = four empty lines
}
```
Contain as much "empty lines" before the JSON string as the number
of paths displayed.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
When calling time(NULL), FRR is intentionally throwing
away the upper 32 bits of value returned. Let's explicitly
call it out so that coverity understands this is intentional
and ok.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Let's convert to our actual library call instead
of using yet another abstraction that makes it fun
for people to switch daemons.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Running the `zebra_seg6local_route` topotest with `--valgrind-memleaks`
gives several memory leak errors. This is due to the way SRv6 routes
(seg6 and seg6local routes) are handled: when the user executes the CLI
command `sharp install seg6-routes` or `sharp install seg6local-routes`
to create a seg6 or seg6local route, sharpd calls
`nexthop_add_srv6_seg6` or `nexthop_add_srv6_seg6local` to create an
SRv6 nexthop. A pointer to the SRv6 nexthop is stored in the global data
structure `sg.r.nhop`. If you call `sharp install routes`,
`sharp install seg6-routes` or `sharp install seg6local-routes` to create
more routes, `sg.r.nhop` is set to zero and the
pointer to the SRv6 nexthop contained in `sg.r.nhop` is definitely lost
and the allocated memory is never freed.
This patch adds calls to `nexthop_del_srv6_seg6()` and
`nexthop_del_srv6_seg6local()` to free the memory allocated for the SRv6
nexthop before clearing the `sg.r.nhop` data structure.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Running the `zebra_seg6local_route` topotest with `--valgrind-memleaks`
gives several memory leak errors. This is due to the way SRv6 chunks are
released: when the user executes the CLI command
`sharp srv6-manager release-locator-chunk` to release the chunks of an
SRv6 locator, the `list_delete()` function is called to delete the
chunks list (`loc->chunks`), but the memory allocated for the chunks is
not freed.
This patch defines a new callback `sharp_srv6_locator_chunk_free()`.
This callback takes care of freeing the memory allocated for a given
chunk. When `list_delete()` is called to remove the chunk list
`loc->chunks`, it automatically calls `sharp_srv6_locator_chunk_free()`
on each element of the list to free the allocated memory before
deleting the list.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Running the `zebra_seg6local_route` topotest with `--valgrind-memleaks`
gives several memory leak errors. This is due to the way SRv6 chunks are
released: when the user executes the CLI command
`sharp srv6-manager release-locator-chunk` to release the chunks of an
SRv6 locator, all the chunks are removed from the list `loc->chunks`.
Also, the locator is removed from the SRv6 locators list
`sg.srv6_locators`, but the memory allocated for the locator is not
freed.
This patch adds a call to `XFREE()` to properly free the allocated
memory when all the chunks of an SRv6 locator are removed and the
locator is removed as well.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Running `bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf` and `bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf2`
topotests with `--valgrind-memleaks` gives several memory leak errors.
This is due to the way SRv6 locators are removed/unset in bgpd: when
an SRv6 locator is deleted or unset, the memory allocated for the
locator prefix (`tovpn_sid_locator`) is not freed.
This patch adds a `for` loop that iterates over the list of BGP
instances. For each BGP instance using the SRv6 locator to be
removed/unset, we use `XFREE()` to properly free the memory allocated
for `tovpn_sid_locator` after the SRv6 locator is removed or unset.
The memory allocated for `tovpn_sid_locator` cannot be freed before
calling `vpn_leak_postchange_all()`. This is because
after deleting an SRv6 locator, we call `vpn_leak_postchange_all()`
to handle the SRv6 locator deletion and send a BGP Prefix SID withdraw
message. `tovpn_sid_locator` is required to properly build the BGP
Prefix SID withdraw message. After calling `vpn_leak_postchange_all()`
we can safely remove the `tovpn_sid_locator` and free the allocated
memory.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Running `bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf` and `bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf2`
topotests with `--valgrind-memleaks` gives several memory leak errors.
This is due to the way SRv6 SIDs are removed in bgpd: when
an SRv6 locator is deleted/unset, all the SIDs allocated from that
locator are removed from the SRv6 functions list
(`bgp->srv6_functions`),but the memory allocated for the SIDs is not
freed.
This patch adds a call to `XFREE()` to properly free the allocated
memory when an SRv6 SID is removed.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Running `bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf` and `bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf2`
topotests with `--valgrind-memleaks` gives several memory leak errors.
This is due to the way SRv6 locators are deleted/unset in bgpd: when
an SRv6 locator is deleted/unset, all the chunks of the locator are
removed from the SRv6 locator chunks list (`bgp->srv6_locator_chunks`).
However, the memory allocated for the chunks is not freed.
This patch adds a call to the `srv6_locator_chunk_free()` function to
properly free the allocated memory when an SRv6 locator is removed or
unset.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Running `bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf` and `bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf2`
topotests with `--valgrind-memleaks` gives several memory leak errors.
This is due to the way FRR daemons pass local SIDs to zebra: to send a
local SID to zebra, FRR daemons call the `zclient_send_localsid()`
function.
The `zclient_send_localsid()` function performs the following sequence
of operations:
* create a temporary `struct nexthop`;
* call `nexthop_add_srv6_seg6local()` to fill the `struct nexthop` with
the proper local SID information;
* create a `struct zapi_route` and call `zapi_nexthop_from_nexthop()` to
copy the information from the `struct nexthop` to the
`struct zapi_route`;
* send the `struct zapi_route` to zebra through the ZAPI.
The `nexthop_add_srv6_seg6local()` function uses `XCALLOC()` to allocate
memory for the SRv6 nexthop. This memory is never freed.
Creating a temporary `struct nexthop` is unnecessary, as the local SID
information can be pushed directly to the `struct zapi_route`. This
patch simplifies the implementation of `zclient_send_localsid()` by
avoiding using the temporary `struct nexthop`. This eliminates the need
to use `nexthop_add_srv6_seg6local()` to fill the `struct nexthop` and
consequently fixes the memory leak.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Running `srv6_locator` topotest with `--valgrind-memleaks` gives several
memory leak errors. This is due to the way SRv6 locators are deleted:
when an SRv6 locator is deleted, it is removed from the SRv6 locators
list (`srv6->locators`), but the memory allocated for the SRv6 locator
is not freed.
This patch adds a call to the `srv6_locator_free()` function to properly
free the allocated memory when an SRv6 locator is removed.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Overall, rfc1997 states:
The community attribute values ranging from 0x0000000 through
0x0000FFFF and 0xFFFF0000 through 0xFFFFFFFF are hereby reserved.
But we have a special handling here, like Cisco IOS XR.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Description:
Per neighbor GR enabled information is missing from json
output in "show ip ospf gr helper details json" command.
Example config:
frr(config-router)# graceful-restart helper enable 2.2.2.2
frr(config-router)#
frr(config-router)# do show ip ospf graceful-restart helper detail
OSPF Router with ID (10.112.156.220)
Graceful restart helper support disabled.
Strict LSA check is enabled.
Helper supported for Planned and Unplanned Restarts.
Supported Graceful restart interval: 1800(in seconds).
Enable Router list:
2.2.2.2,
frr(config-router)# do show ip ospf graceful-restart helper detail json
{
"routerId":"10.112.156.220",
"helperSupport":"Disabled",
"strictLsaCheck":"Enabled",
"restartSupoort":"Planned and Unplanned Restarts",
"supportedGracePeriod":1800,
}
frr(config-router)#
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Girada <rgirada@vmware.com>
IPv4 and IPv6 behaves a little bit differently with the socket
options.
IPPROTO_RAW socket option is only for IPv4.
Therefore the register packet was not properly getting encapculated
for PIMv6 and was working fine for PIMv4.
So have used IPPROTO_PIM for PIMv6.
Fixes: #11846
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
BGP SoO is a tag that is appended on BGP updates to allow a peer to mark
a particular peer as belonging to a particular site. In certain MPLS L3 VPN
configurations, the BGP AS-Path may not provide the granularity needed
prevent a loop in the control-plane. With this in mind, BGP SoO is designed
to fill this gap and prevent a routing loop that may occur.
If we configure for example, `neighbor soo 65000:1` at PEs, routes won't be
announced between CPEs if soo matches. This is especially needed when using
as-override or allowas-in.
Also, this is the automated way of the same behavior as configuring route-maps
for each peer like:
```
bgp extcommunity-list cpe permit soo 65000:1
!
route-map cpe permit 10
set extcommunity soo 65000:1
...
route-map cpe deny 10
match extcommunity cpe
route-map cpe permit 20
...
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Fix issue #11839.
When the user defines a range in an area other than the backbone area, the
summary route will be announced to the backbone area as an inter-area LSA.
However, if the prefix defined in the range is the same prefix as a connected
route in that area, the LSA won't be announced to the backbone area.
This is because when ospf6d is originating the summary route for the
intra-area route, it finds the range configured by the user and tries to
suppress the route by deleting the existing summary route, which happens to be
the one created by the range.
Although the range definition is not necessary in this case, it should not
fail this use case. So let's just keep the summary route there if it is
created from the user defined range.
Signed-off-by: Xiaodong Xu <stid.smth@gmail.com>
