Test fails:
test_func = partial(
topotest.router_json_cmp,
router,
"show ip ospf vrf {0}-ospf-cust1 json".format(rname),
expected,
)
_, diff = topotest.run_and_expect(test_func, None, count=10, wait=0.5)
assertmsg = '"{}" JSON output mismatches'.format(rname)
> assert diff is None, assertmsg
E AssertionError: "r1" JSON output mismatches
E assert Generated JSON diff error report:
E
E > $->r1-ospf-cust1->areas->0.0.0.0->nbrFullAdjacentCounter: output has element with value '1' but in expected it has value '2'
/home/sharpd/frr2/tests/topotests/ospf_netns_vrf/test_ospf_netns_vrf.py:239: AssertionError
Support bundle has this data:
r1# show ip ospf vrf all neighbor
% 2024/08/28 14:55:54.763
VRF Name: r1-ospf-cust1
Neighbor ID Pri State Up Time Dead Time Address Interface RXmtL RqstL DBsmL
10.0.255.3 1 Full/DR 10.547s 39.456s 10.0.3.1 r1-eth1:10.0.3.2 0 0 0
10.0.255.2 1 Full/Backup 0.543s 38.378s 10.0.3.3 r1-eth1:10.0.3.2 1 0 0
So immediately after the test fails this test, the neighbor comes up.
Let's give the test a bit more time for failure to not happen
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
(cherry picked from commit d58c44cebe)
mgmtd has to know if netns is used as the vrf backend to correctly
process interface names in northbound.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Create Local routes in FRR:
S 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.119.1, enp39s0, weight 1, 00:03:46
K>* 0.0.0.0/0 [0/100] via 192.168.119.1, enp39s0, 00:03:51
O 192.168.119.0/24 [110/100] is directly connected, enp39s0, weight 1, 00:03:46
C>* 192.168.119.0/24 is directly connected, enp39s0, 00:03:51
L>* 192.168.119.224/32 is directly connected, enp39s0, 00:03:51
O 192.168.119.229/32 [110/100] via 0.0.0.0, enp39s0 inactive, weight 1, 00:03:46
C>* 192.168.119.229/32 is directly connected, enp39s0, 00:03:46
Create ability to redistribute local routes.
Modify tests to support this change.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
