Problem Statement:
==================
on rp_change, PIM processes all the upstream in a loop and for selected
upstreams PIM has to send join/prune based on the RPF changed.
join and prune packets are not getting aggregated in a single packet.
Root Cause Analysis:
====================
on pim_rp_change pim_upstream_update() gets called for selected upstreams.
This API calculates to whom it has to send join and to whom it has to
send prune via API pim_zebra_upstream_rpf_changed(). This API peprares
the upstream_switch_list list per interface and inserts the group and
sources.
Now PIM is still in the pim_upstream_update() API context, i.e PIM
is still processing the same upstream. In the last there is a
call to pim_zebra_update_all_interfaces() which processes the
upstream_switch_list list, sends the packets out and clears the list.
Fix:
====
Don't process the upstream_switch_list in the upstream context.
process all the upstreams prepare the upstream_switch_list and then
process in one go. This will club all the S,G entries.
It also saves list cleanup with respect to memory allocation and
deallocation multiple times.
Signed-off-by: Vishal Dhingra <rac.vishaldhingra@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
The Bootstrap message RX path needs a RPF check for the BSR address,
and this is implemented both incorrectly as well as quite ugly.
Clean up and fix case when we have multiple interfaces to the same LAN
and/or ECMP nexthops (both would cause message duplication, the former
can even cause BSM forwarding loops.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Most users of if_lookup_address_exact only cared about whether the
address is any local address. Split that off into a separate function.
For the users that actually need the ifp - which I'm about to add a few
of - change it to prefer returning interfaces that are UP.
(Function name changed due to slight change in behavior re. UP state, to
avoid possible bugs from this change.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
pimd's include files are very interdependent. Let's chop that down a
bit to gain some flexibility.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Problem Statement:
==================
valgrind shows memleaks in rp_table, when pimd shuts down gracefully.
2020-05-05 22:09:29,451 ERROR: Memory leaks in router [r4] for daemon [pimd]
2020-05-05 22:09:29,451 ERROR: Memory leaks in router [r4] for daemon [zebra]
2020-05-05 22:09:29,637 ERROR: Found memory leak in module pimd
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== 184 (56 direct, 128 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 21 of 21
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== at 0x4C2FFAC: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:762)
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== by 0x4E855EE: qcalloc (memory.c:111)
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== by 0x4EAA43C: route_table_init_with_delegate (table.c:52)
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== by 0x1281A1: pim_rp_init (pim_rp.c:114)
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== by 0x11D0F8: pim_instance_init (pim_instance.c:117)
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== by 0x11D0F8: pim_vrf_new (pim_instance.c:150)
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== by 0x4EB1BEC: vrf_get (vrf.c:209)
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== by 0x4EB2B2F: vrf_init (vrf.c:493)
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== by 0x11D227: pim_vrf_init (pim_instance.c:217)
2020-05-05 22:09:29,638 ERROR: ==6178== by 0x11BBAB: main (pim_main.c:121)
Fix:
====
rp_info is allocated in pim_rp_init API. rp_info pointer is present
in rp_list and rp_table. In rp_list cleanup, the memory for rp_info
gets freed. rp_table clean up should be done first and then rp_list.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
... the PIM code is kinda misusing prefix lists to match addresses.
Considering the weird semantics of access-lists, I can't fault it.
However, prefix lists aren't great at matching addresses by default,
since they try to match the prefix length too. So, here's an "address
match mode" for prefix lists to get that to work more reasonably.
Fixes: #8492
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
VRF creation can happen from either cli or from
knowledged about the vrf learned from zebra.
In the case where we learn about the vrf from
the cli, the vrf id is UNKNOWN. Upon actual
creation of the vrf, lib/vrf.c touches up the vrf_id
and calls pim_vrf_enable to turn it on properly.
At this point in time we have a pim->vrf_id of
UNKNOWN and the vrf->vrf_id of the right value.
There is no point in duplicating this data. So just
remove all pim->vrf_id and use the vrf->vrf_id instead
since we keep a copy of the pim->vrf pointer.
This will remove some crashes where we expect the
pim->vrf_id to be usable and it's not.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Neither tabs nor newlines are acceptable in syslog messages. They also
break line-based parsing of file logs.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
This command has been added in the context of
PIM BSM functionality. This command will clear the
data structs having bsr information.
Co-authored-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: vishaldhingra <vdhingra@vmware.com>
Create appropriate accessor functions for the rn->lock
data. We should be accessing this data through accessor
functions since it is private data to the data structure.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When creating a pim instance, we were allocating table information
but never freeing it. Do so.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Replace sprintf with snprintf where straightforward to do so.
- sprintf's into local scope buffers of known size are replaced with the
equivalent snprintf call
- snprintf's into local scope buffers of known size that use the buffer
size expression now use sizeof(buffer)
- sprintf(buf + strlen(buf), ...) replaced with snprintf() into temp
buffer followed by strlcat
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
Issue 1: "show ip pim interface traffic" not show prune TX/RX
Rootcause : not added the variable in the json
Fix : add prune TX/RX in show ip pim interface traffic json
Issue 2: "show ip pim rp-info" not shows the key iAmRp when it is false
Rootcause: Only display the key when the value is true.
Fix: add iAmRp as false in show ip pim rp-info json
Issue 3: "show ip pim rp-info" not showing outbound interface if it is empty
Rootcause: Only display when there is any OIL
Fix: When RP is not reachable then, the outbound interface is Unknown
The command "show ip pim rp-info json" not displaying the outbound
interafce if it is unknown
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Problem: Route node is not de referenced after search when pim debug events are
not enabled when pim_rp_find_match_group is called. So this memory will not get
released when route node is deleted after hitting this path.
RCA: Dereferencing is done inside debug condition.
Fix: Moving outside debug condition
Signed-off-by: Saravanan K <saravanank@vmware.com>
Convert the upstream_list and hash to a rb tree, Significant
time was being spent in the listnode_add_sort. This reduces
this time greatly.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
A variety of buffer overflow reads and crashes
that could occur if you fed bad info into pim.
1) When type is setup incorrectly we were printing the first 8 bytes
of the pim_parse_addr_source, but the min encoding length is
4 bytes. As such we will read beyond end of buffer.
2) The RP(pim, grp) macro can return a NULL value
Do not automatically assume that we can deref
the data.
3) BSM parsing was not properly sanitizing data input from wire
and we could enter into situations where we would read beyond
the end of the buffer. Prevent this from happening, we are
probably left in a bad way.
4) The received bit length cannot be greater than 32 bits,
refuse to allow it to happen.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When configuring a RP, dissallow the choice of 0.0.0.0 or
255.255.255.255 as the address as that they make no sense
what so ever.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
We were adding a newline for the source in some cases
but not others and tighten up the display of data
eva# show ip pim rp-info
RP address group/prefix-list OIF I am RP Source
10.254.0.1 224.0.0.0/4 lo yes Static
4.4.4.4 225.1.2.3/32 abcdefghijklmno yes Static
10.0.20.45 226.200.100.100/32 r1-eth0 no Static
eva#
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
This was causing pimd to crash later; call-stack -
(gdb) bt
context=<optimized out>) at lib/sigevent.c:254
group=group@entry=0x7ffffa9797e0) at pimd/pim_rp.c:207
grp=grp@entry=0x7ffffa9799fe, sgs=sgs@entry=0x560ac069edb0, size=52)
at pimd/pim_msg.c:200
groups=<optimized out>) at pimd/pim_join.c:562
at pimd/pim_neighbor.c:288
at lib/thread.c:1599
at lib/libfrr.c:1024
envp=<optimized out>) at pimd/pim_main.c:162
(gdb) fr 4
group=group@entry=0x7ffffa9797e0) at pimd/pim_rp.c:207
207 pimd/pim_rp.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) fr 6
grp=grp@entry=0x7ffffa9799fe, sgs=sgs@entry=0x560ac069edb0, size=52)
at pimd/pim_msg.c:200
200 pimd/pim_msg.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) p source->up->sg_str
$1 = '\000' <repeats 31 times>, <incomplete sequence \361>
(gdb)
This problem can manifest in the following event sequence -
1. upstream RPF neighbor is resolved
2. upstream RPF neighbor becomes unresolved (but upstream entry
stays on the jp-agg list)
3. upstream entry is removed
on the next old-neighbor jp-agg-list processing the stale entry is
accessed resulting in the crash.
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
RP config change is a big hammer and use_rpt/spt needs to be
re-evaluated on all existing (S,G) entries.
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
mfcc_parent for an (S, G) entry was being updated on any upstream RPF
change. With the change to use RPT for (S,G) in some cases we can no
longer do that. Instead the upstream entry's RPF neigbor is managed
separately form the channel_oil's mfcc_parent i.e. via NHT. And the
mfcc_parent is evaluated at the time of mroute programming.
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
When you turn on `debug igmp trace` we are seeing a bunch
of debugs associated with pim processing. This is because we were
using PIM_DEBUG_TRACE which is both `debug igmp trace` and `debug pim trace`
when tracing igmp code it would be nice to only see igmp work.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
We already log whether or not we add nht tracking, having
an additional boolean to say to log another line is
a bit over the top.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
pim_rp_new split into pim_rp_new_config and pim_rp_new.
pim_rp_new_config is called by CLI.
pim_rp_new will be called by pim_rp_new_config and bsm rp config.
pim_rp_del is split into pim_rp_del_config and pim_rp_del
pim_rp_del_config is called by CLI.
pim_rp_del is called by pim_rp_del_config and bsm rp config
Signed-off-by: Saravanan K <saravanank@vmware.com>
Sw3# sh ip pim rp-info
RP address group/prefix-list OIF I am RP Source
20.0.0.2 225.1.1.1/32 ens192 no BSR
9.9.9.9 226.1.1.1/32 (Unknown) no BSR
30.0.0.100 229.1.1.5/32 ens192 no Static
Signed-off-by: Saravanan K <saravanank@vmware.com>
Start the separation of tracking a Destination from the act
of looking it up. The cojoining of these two concepts led
to a bunch of code that had to think about both problems leading
to weird situations and code paths. Simplify the code by making
pim_ecmp_nexthop_search a static function and we only ever
call pim_ecmp_nexthop_lookup when we need to do a RPF().
pim_ecmp_nexthop_lookup will now attempt to find a stored pnc
and if it finds one it will report on the answer from it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When creating new RP information from a `ip pim rp A.B.C.D/M A.B.C.D`
we should determine if we are the RP even if we can or cannot
determine if we have a path to the RP via RPF.
This is because we should determine if we are the RP based upon a
connected ip address match not whether or not we have a path to
the RPF. We would normally think this is not important but
RPF is inherently asynchronous and we can have a state where
we have registered for nht but have not received the actual
path back yet from zebra.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When a new pim neighbor comes up, we need to go through and
mark nexthops that we have received from zebra for reachability
tracking so we can refigure stuff. If we pass in the new neighbor
we can limit the search to those nexthops out the interface that
the new neighbor has come up.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
