Back when I put this together in 2015, ISO C11 was still reasonably new
and we couldn't require it just yet. Without ISO C11, there is no
"good" way (only bad hacks) to require a semicolon after a macro that
ends with a function definition. And if you added one anyway, you'd get
"spurious semicolon" warnings on some compilers...
With C11, `_Static_assert()` at the end of a macro will make it so that
the semicolon is properly required, consumed, and not warned about.
Consistently requiring semicolons after "file-level" macros matches
Linux kernel coding style and helps some editors against mis-syntax'ing
these macros.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
1. Modifies the data structs to make the distance, tag and table-id
property of a route, i.e created a hireachical data struct to save
route and nexthop information.
2. Backend northbound implementation
Signed-off-by: VishalDhingra <vdhingra@vmware.com>
This is the start of separating out the static
handling code from zebra -> staticd. This will
help simplify the zebra code and isolate static
route handling to it's own code base.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
