For BSMs, we should track which of the RP candidates in the BSM message
are actually available, before trying to use them (which also puts them
in NHT for that). This applies for both BSRs as well as BSM receivers.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Topology Used:
=============
Cisco---FRR4----FRR2
Initially PIM nbr is down between FRR4----FRR2 from FRR2 side
Cisco is sending BSR packet to FRR4.
Problem Statement:
=================
No shutdown the PIM neighbor on FRR2 towards FRR4.
FRR2, receives BSR packet immediately as the new neighbor
comes up. This BSR packet is having no-forward bit set.
FRR2 is not able to process the BSR packet, and drop the
BSR packet.
Root Cause:
==========
When PIMD comes up, we start BSM timer for 60 seconds.
Here, the value accept_nofwd_bsm is setting to false.
FRR2, when receives no-forward BSR packet, it is getting
accept_nofwd_bsm value as false.
So, it drops, the no-forward BSM packet.
Fix:
===
Set accept_nofwd_bsm as false after first BSM packet received.
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Effectively a massive search and replace of
`struct thread` to `struct event`. Using the
term `thread` gives people the thought that
this event system is a pthread when it is not
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
These are in packed structs at weird offsets (e.g. 2 bytes), and as such
need a memcpy to get them into proper alignment.
It'd be even better if the pimd code used proper de/serialization, but
let's get this improved one step at a time.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
For pim callbacks, we pass pim_addr as value, not pointer.
So making it consistent for pim_nht callbacks.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Added this api to fill all multicast group address based on IP version.
For PIMv4 its 224.0.0.0/4, for PIMv6 its FF00::0/8.
Changed the code where its being used currently.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
We can use PIMADDR_ANY instead of INADDR_NONE to initalize rp->rpf_addr
when there is no rp configured for group_all.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Since `pim_sgaddr` is `pim_addr` now, that causes a whole lot of fallout
anywhere S,G pairs are handled.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
In all places that pim_nht_bsr_del is called, the code
needs to not unregister if the current_bsr is INADDR_ANY.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
I'm now seeing in my log file:
2022/01/28 11:20:05 PIM: [Q0PZ7-QBBN3] attempting to delete nonexistent NHT BSR entry 0.0.0.0
2022/01/28 11:20:05 PIM: [Q0PZ7-QBBN3] attempting to delete nonexistent NHT BSR entry 0.0.0.0
2022/01/28 11:20:06 PIM: [Q0PZ7-QBBN3] attempting to delete nonexistent NHT BSR entry 0.0.0.0
When I run pimd. Looking at the code there are 3 places where pim_bsm.c removes the
NHT BSR tracking. In 2 of them the code ensures that the address is already setup
in 1 place it is not. Fix.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Replaces comparison against INADDR_ANY, so we can do IPv6 too.
(Renamed from "pim_is_addr_any" for "pim_addr_*" naming pattern, and
type fixed to bool.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Problem Statement:
==================
on rp_change, PIM processes all the upstream in a loop and for selected
upstreams PIM has to send join/prune based on the RPF changed.
join and prune packets are not getting aggregated in a single packet.
Root Cause Analysis:
====================
on pim_rp_change pim_upstream_update() gets called for selected upstreams.
This API calculates to whom it has to send join and to whom it has to
send prune via API pim_zebra_upstream_rpf_changed(). This API peprares
the upstream_switch_list list per interface and inserts the group and
sources.
Now PIM is still in the pim_upstream_update() API context, i.e PIM
is still processing the same upstream. In the last there is a
call to pim_zebra_update_all_interfaces() which processes the
upstream_switch_list list, sends the packets out and clears the list.
Fix:
====
Don't process the upstream_switch_list in the upstream context.
process all the upstreams prepare the upstream_switch_list and then
process in one go. This will club all the S,G entries.
It also saves list cleanup with respect to memory allocation and
deallocation multiple times.
Signed-off-by: Vishal Dhingra <rac.vishaldhingra@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
rp-count==0 isn't a broken BSM, it just means the BSR no longer has any
Candidate RPs for the group range. Previous behavior is badly mistaken
since it stops processing the entire packet.
Fix to correctly remove group range on rp-count==0 and continue
processing remainder of the packet.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
... where it actually belongs. And make a bunch of stuff static, since
it's no longer used across files now.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
The Bootstrap message RX path needs a RPF check for the BSR address,
and this is implemented both incorrectly as well as quite ugly.
Clean up and fix case when we have multiple interfaces to the same LAN
and/or ECMP nexthops (both would cause message duplication, the former
can even cause BSM forwarding loops.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
