Don't use 'interface WORD area A.B.C.D' for enabling OSPFv3 areas on
interfaces and instead use the standardized 'ipv6 ospf6 area A.B.C.D'.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
This test is sometimes failing when it looks at the
v6 routes in the fib. Since the step before is
ensuring that v3 ospf has just converged let's
give it a bit of time to find and see if things
have had a chance to install the routes too.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The test does this:
a) shut link down
b) test for ospf convergence
c) ensure the route is installed
When under a heavily loaded system c) is not guaranteed
to happen quickly. Give the system 10 extra seconds
to ensure it happens.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
OSPF when it is deciding on whom it should elect for DR and backup
has a process that prioritizes network stabilty over the exact
same results of who is the DR / Backups.
Essentially if we have r1 ----- r2
Let's say r1 has a higher priority, but r2 comes up first, starts
sending hello packets and then decides that it is the DR. At some
point in time in the future, r1 comes up and then connects to r2
at that point it sees that r2 has elected itself DR and it keeps
it that way.
This is by design of the system. With our tight ospf timers as
well as high load being experienced on our test systems. There
exists a bunch of ospf tests that we cannot guarantee that a
consistent DR will be elected for the test. As such let's not
even pretend that we care a bunch and just look for `Full`.
If we care about `ordering` we need to spend more time getting
the tests to actually start routers, ensure that htey are up and
running in the right order so that priority can take place.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Change every `-` to `_` in directory names. This is to avoid mixing _ and -.
Just for consistency and directory sorting properly.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
