Show per VRF RPKI configuration in "show run".
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Add a hook to call a future callback function when bgpd knows from zebra
about the activation of de-activation of a VRF. It will be used by the
RPKI module in next commits.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
When a peer has come up and already started installing
routes into the rib and `suppress-fib-pending` is either
turned on or off. BGP is left with some routes that
may need to be withdrawn from peers and routes that
it does not know the status of. Clear the BGP peers
for the interesting parties and let's let us come
up to speed as needed.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Implement proper memory cleanup for SRv6 functions and locator chunks to prevent potential memory leaks.
The list callback deletion functions have been set.
The ASan leak log for reference:
```
***********************************************************************************
Address Sanitizer Error detected in bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf.test_bgp_srv6l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf/r2.asan.bgpd.4180
=================================================================
==4180==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 544 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f8d176a0d28 in __interceptor_calloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xded28)
#1 0x7f8d1709f238 in qcalloc lib/memory.c:105
#2 0x55d5dba6ee75 in sid_register bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c:591
#3 0x55d5dba6ee75 in alloc_new_sid bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c:712
#4 0x55d5dba6f3ce in ensure_vrf_tovpn_sid_per_af bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c:758
#5 0x55d5dba6fb94 in ensure_vrf_tovpn_sid bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c:849
#6 0x55d5dba7f975 in vpn_leak_postchange bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.h:299
#7 0x55d5dba7f975 in vpn_leak_postchange_all bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c:3704
#8 0x55d5dbbb6c66 in bgp_zebra_process_srv6_locator_chunk bgpd/bgp_zebra.c:3164
#9 0x7f8d1716f08a in zclient_read lib/zclient.c:4459
#10 0x7f8d1713f034 in event_call lib/event.c:1974
#11 0x7f8d1708242b in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1214
#12 0x55d5db99d19d in main bgpd/bgp_main.c:510
#13 0x7f8d160c5c86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21c86)
Direct leak of 296 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f8d176a0d28 in __interceptor_calloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xded28)
#1 0x7f8d1709f238 in qcalloc lib/memory.c:105
#2 0x7f8d170b1d5f in srv6_locator_chunk_alloc lib/srv6.c:135
#3 0x55d5dbbb6a19 in bgp_zebra_process_srv6_locator_chunk bgpd/bgp_zebra.c:3144
#4 0x7f8d1716f08a in zclient_read lib/zclient.c:4459
#5 0x7f8d1713f034 in event_call lib/event.c:1974
#6 0x7f8d1708242b in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1214
#7 0x55d5db99d19d in main bgpd/bgp_main.c:510
#8 0x7f8d160c5c86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21c86)
***********************************************************************************
```
Signed-off-by: Keelan Cannoo <keelan.cannoo@icloud.com>
When exporting BGP prefixes, it is necessary to configure
the route target extended communities with the following
command:
> rt vpn export <RouteTarget>
But the customer may need to configure the route-target to
apply to bgp updates, solely based on a route-map criterium.
by using the below route-map configured like that:
> route-map vpn export <routemapname>
Fix this by allowing to export bgp updates based on the
presence of route-targets on either route-map or vpn
configured rt. the exportation process is stopped
if no route target is available in the ecommunity list.
Fixes: ddb5b4880b ("bgpd: vpn-vrf route leaking")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
It's been for a while disabled by default, but this seems reasonable to flip it.
We had `bgp enforce-first-as` as a global BGP knob to enable/disable this
behavior globally, later we introduced `enforce-first-as` per neighbor, with disabled
by default. Now let's enable this by default by bringing a global `bgp enforce-first-as`
command back.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
In zebra, the import check table and the nexthop check tables
were combined. This leaves an issue where when bgp happens
to have a tracked address in both the import check table
and the nexthop track table that are the same address.
When the the item is removed from one table the call
to remove it from zebra removes tracking for the other
table.
Combine the two tables together and keep track where
they came from for processing in bgpd.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
There is no command to choose to send or not the bgp4-mibv2 traps.
Since the MIB bgp4-mibv2 notification are redundant with MIB RFC4273
we added a command:
- [no] bgp snmp traps bgp4-mibv2
By default, the bgp4-mibv2 traps will be disabled, to prevent from
redundancy.
Signed-off-by: Francois Dumontet <francois.dumontet@6wind.com>
There is no cli command to prevent the router to send traps
implemented in the rfc4273. If not done, when introducing
the traps from bgp4v2mib, traps will be send for each of
the two mibs: there will be redundancy in the sent information.
Add a new command:
- [no] bgp snmp traps rfc4273
Using this command will allow or not the notification of
the following traps:
- bgpEstablishedNotification
- bgpBackwardTransNotification
Signed-off-by: Francois Dumontet <francois.dumontet@6wind.com>
For instance, it's not possible to resend FQDN capability without resetting
the session, so let's create some more elegant way to do that.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Today, when configuring BGP L3VPN mpls, the operator may
use that command to hardset a label value:
> router bgp 65500 vrf vrf1
> address-family ipv4 unicast
> label vpn export <hardset_label_value>
Today, BGP uses this value without checks, leading to potential
conflicts with other control planes like LDP. For instance, if
LDP initiates with a label chunk of [16;72] and BGP also uses the
50 label value, a conflict arises.
The 'label manager' service in zebra oversees label allocations.
While all the control plane daemons use it, BGP doesn't when a
hardset label is in place.
This update fixes this problem. Now, when a hardset label is set for
l3vpn export, a request is made to the label manager for approval,
ensuring no conflicts with other daemons. But, this means some existing
BGP configurations might become non-operational if they conflict with
labels already allocated to another daemon but not used.
note: Labels below 16 are reserved and won't be checked for consistency
by the label manager.
Fixes: ddb5b4880b ("bgpd: vpn-vrf route leaking")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
At each EBGP boundary, BGP path attributes are modified as per [RFC4271], which includes stripping any IBGP-only attributes.
Some networks span more than one autonomous system and require more flexibility in the propagation of path attributes. It is worth noting that these multi-AS networks have a common or single administrative entity. These networks are said to belong to One Administrative Domain (OAD). It is desirable to carry IBGP-only attributes across EBGP peerings when the peers belong to an OAD.
This document defines a new EBGP peering type known as EBGP-OAD, which is used between two EBGP peers that belong to an OAD. This document also defines rules for route announcement and processing for EBGP-OAD peers.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-oad
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Add the ability to store a raw copy of the incoming BGP Link-State
attributes and to redistribute them as is to other routes.
New types of data BGP_ATTR_LS and BGP_ATTR_LS_DATA are defined.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2042.html
says: 255 reserved for development
In FRR, 255 is kinda used too BGP_ATTR_VNC, even more we allow setting 255 in CLI.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
```
donatas-pc(config-router)# timers bgp 8 12
% keeplive value 8 is larger than 1/3 of the holdtime, setting to 4
donatas-pc(config-router)# do sh run | include timers bgp
timers bgp 4 12
donatas-pc(config-router)#
```
Closes https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/14287
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
This is based on @donaldsharp's work
The current code base is the struct bgp_node data structure.
The problem with this is that it creates a bunch of
extra data per route_node.
The table structure generates ‘holder’ nodes
that are never going to receive bgp routes,
and now the memory of those nodes is allocated
as if they are a full bgp_node.
After splitting up the bgp_node into bgp_dest and route_node,
the memory of ‘holder’ node which does not have any bgp data
will be allocated as the route_node, not the bgp_node,
and the memory usage is reduced.
The memory usage of BGP node will be reduced from 200B to 96B.
The total memory usage optimization of this part is ~16.00%.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuqing Zhao <xiaopanghu99@163.com>
As part of the conversion to a `struct peer_connection` it will
be desirable to have 2 pointers one for when we open a connection
and one for when we receive a connection. Start this actual
conversion over to this in `struct peer`. If this sounds confusing
take a look at the bgp state machine for connections and how
it resolves the processing of this router opening -vs- this
router receiving an open. At some point in time the state
machine decides that we are keeping one of the two connections.
Future commits will allow us to untangle the peer/doppelganger
duality with this abstraction.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The status and ostatus are a function of the `struct peer_connection`
move it into that data structure.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Move PEER_THREAD_WRITES_ON and PEER_THREAD_READS_ON to
be a part of the `struct peer_connection` since this is
a connection oriented bit of data.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
