With the simple BFD configuration -
(active mode, single hop, without other parameters)
```
!
bfd
peer 11.11.11.11
exit
!
```
The interface with 11.11.11.0/24 is a *virtual* interface,
which can be deleted.
After BFD FSM is created and session is ok, do these things:
1) delete this interface
2) create this interface
3) set same ip address in this interface
Now, everything seems completely restored because all configuration
is same. But bad thing happens, BFD session hang on "down" status -
```
root# show bfd peer 11.11.11.11
BFD Peer:
peer 11.11.11.11 vrf default
ID: 638815827
Remote ID: 0
Active mode
Status: down
Downtime: 3 second(s)
Diagnostics: path down <- caused by destroyed interface
Remote diagnostics: ok
```
With the interface creating, `bfdd_sessions_enable_interface()`
wrongly compares added interface with the created, even key of
this `bfd_session` isn't binded with any interface. So this
`bfd_session` will hang on "down" status for ever.
So skip the compare in this case (no interface in key) to wake up
this `bfd_session`.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
When a bgp neighbor removed from associated to peer-group,
the neighbor is fully deleted, subsequent deletion of any
configuration related to the neighbor leads to failure
in frr-reload.
Fix: In frr-reload lines to delete check if any neighbor with
peer-group removal line is present, if so then remove any
further config deletion associated the neighbor needs to removed
from the lines to delete.
Ticket:#3032234
Reviewed By:
Testing Done:
BEFORE FIX:
-----------
2022-04-08 20:03:32,734 INFO: Executed "router bgp 4200000005 no neighbor swp5 interface peer-group UNDERLAY"
2022-04-08 20:03:32,892 INFO: Failed to execute router bgp 4200000005 no neighbor swp5 password SSSS
2022-04-08 20:03:33,050 INFO: Failed to execute router bgp 4200000005 no neighbor swp5 password
2022-04-08 20:03:33,218 INFO: Failed to execute router bgp 4200000005 no neighbor swp5
2022-04-08 20:03:33,354 INFO: Failed to execute router bgp 4200000005 no neighbor
2022-04-08 20:03:33,520 INFO: Failed to execute router bgp 4200000005 no
2022-04-08 20:03:33,521 ERROR: "router bgp 4200000005 -- no" we failed to remove this command
2022-04-08 20:03:33,521 ERROR: % Specify remote-as or peer-group commands first
2022-04-08 20:03:33,691 INFO: Failed to execute router bgp 4200000005 no neighbor swp5 advertisement-interval 0
2022-04-08 20:03:33,853 INFO: Failed to execute router bgp 4200000005 no neighbor swp5 advertisement-interval
2022-04-08 20:03:34,015 INFO: Failed to execute router bgp 4200000005 no neighbor swp5
2022-04-08 20:03:34,145 INFO: Failed to execute router bgp 4200000005 no neighbor
2022-04-08 20:03:34,326 INFO: Failed to execute router bgp 4200000005 no
2022-04-08 20:03:34,327 ERROR: "router bgp 4200000005 -- no" we failed to remove this command
2022-04-08 20:03:34,327 ERROR: % Specify remote-as or peer-group commands first
AFTER FIX:
----------
delete of numbered neighbor:
2022-04-08 19:52:17,204 INFO: Executed "router bgp 4200000005 no
neighbor 1.2.3.4 peer-group UNDERLAY"
2022-04-08 19:52:17,205 INFO: /var/run/frr/reload-GRFX1M.txt content
delete of unnumbered neighbor:
2022-04-08 20:00:02,952 INFO: Executed "router bgp 4200000005 no
neighbor swp5 interface peer-group UNDERLAY"
2022-04-08 20:00:02,953 INFO: /var/run/frr/reload-722C3P.txt content
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@nvidia.com>
BGPd does not allow default instance deletion
in presence of bgp vrf instance;
frr-reload script fails if delete list contains
default instance followed by vrf instance.
Fix:
frr-reload scans lines_to_delete to look for
'router bgp' and 'router bgp vrf ...' line.
If both are present switch the order to delete
bgp vrf instance(s) than default instance at the end.
Testing Done:
Before:
INFO: Loading Config object from file /etc/frr/frr.conf
INFO: Loading Config object from vtysh show running
INFO: Failed to execute no router bgp 40201 <-- Failed to delete
INFO: Failed to execute no router bgp
INFO: Failed to execute no router
ERROR: "no router" we failed to remove this command
ERROR: % Cannot delete default BGP instance. Dependent VRF instances exist
INFO: Executed "no router bgp 40201 vrf bgp-test" <-- vrf instance deleted
INFO: Loading Config object from vtysh show running
After:
order of deletion switched
INFO: Loading Config object from file /etc/frr/frr.conf
INFO: Loading Config object from vtysh show running
INFO: Executed "no router bgp 40201 vrf bgp-test"
INFO: Executed "no router bgp 40201"
INFO: Loading Config object from vtysh show running
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@nvidia.com>
VRRP as per RFC 5798 'Master Advertisement interval' field refers to the
advertisement interval, we received the last time we got an Advertisement
from a peer who wasn't us, who was in the master state.
This could be clarified by making the field name 'Master Advertisement
interval (rx)',and when we're in the Master state, we put (stale) after the interval.
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Varatharaj <rvaratharaj@nvidia.com>
That commit aim is to fix an invalid isis access to sptree when
lpd is stopping. isisd is running.
lpd and isisd are running. isis is L1 type configured.
isis_ldp_rlfa_handle_client_close function try to clear
uninitialized spftree.
Expected behavior: isisd not crashing and running.
isis_ldp_rlfa_handle_client_close not trying to clear spftree
that are not initializes due tio the configuration.
Fix: test the configured area's type avoiding to deleted
an unconfigured sptree. function isis_rlfa_handle_client_close
will be aligned on spftree_area_del function
Signed-off-by: Francois Dumontet <francois.dumontet@6wind.com>
End operator is showing:
!
frr version 8.0.1
frr defaults traditional
hostname test.example.com
domainname
domainname should not be printed in this case at all. I do not
see any mechanism in current code that this could happen, but
what do I know? Put some extra stupid insurance in place
to prevent bad config from being generated.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
5421bf8 commit forgot to set the parameter "new" to true
when a new source is created, have fixed it.
igmp_get_source_by_addr api is currently setting the parameter
"new" to false always. This is not right. The caller apis are using
this field to decide and based on that take actions to create timers, etc.
Its need to be set to true when a new source is created.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
watchfrr and staticd do not require <1024 ports to be running, thus they can
start, but others fail.
We should allow only users with EUID=0 (sudo or root) running frrinit.sh.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
In addition to turning on isis bfd debugging traces, the internal
bfd messaging debug is also enabled. Reversely, when isis bfd traces
are off, the internal messaging debug traces are off too.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Add initial zebra tracepoint support infrastructure
as well as add a frr_zebra:netlink_interface
callback.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
If you are in a situation where you have multiple addresses on an
interface, zebra creates one connected route for them.
The issue is that the rib entry is not created if addresses were
added before the interface was running.
We add the address to a running interface in a typical flow.
Therefore, we handle the route & rib creation within a single ADD event.
In the opposite case, we create the route entries without activating them.
These are considered to be active since ZEBRA_IFC_DOWN is not set.
On the following interface UP, we ignore the same ADDR_ADD as it overlaps
with the existing prefixes -> rib is never created.
The minimal reproducible setup:
-----------------------------------------
ip link add name dummy0 type dummy
ip addr flush dev dummy0
ip link set dummy0 down
ip addr add 192.168.1.7/24 dev dummy0
ip addr add 192.168.1.8/24 dev dummy0
ip link set dummy0 up
vtysh -c 'show ip route' | grep dummy0
Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Huti <v.huti@vyos.io>
Recent commit e92508a741 changed
the prefix_master->str to a RB tree. This introduced a condition
whnere on shutdown the prefix list was removed from the master list
and then operated on by passing around a name. Which was then used
to lookup the prefix list again when we operated on the code.
This change to a RB Tree first deleted the item from the RB tree
first thus introducing this crash
Crash:
(gdb) bt
index=0x556c07d59650, pentry=0x556c07d29380) at lib/routemap.c:2397
arg=0x7ffdbf84bc60) at lib/hash.c:267
event=RMAP_EVENT_PLIST_DELETED) at lib/routemap.c:2489
Grab the first item on the list, clean it and then remove it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When we do "log file /var/log/frr/something", permissions are set to
0640 (frr:frr), but when the logrotate kicks in, we have 0640 (frr:frrvty).
I believe, we should have a consistent permissions.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
At the moment we set /var/log/frr permissions to 0750 (frr:frr), but the log
file is 0640 (root:adm) (unless logrotated) and that doesn't allow adm group
to even open the directory.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
