Currently the ospf6d's commands with non-exist vrfs can't give the error
informations to users.
This commit adds a macro "OSPF6_CMD_CHECK_VRF" to give error information
if with non-exist vrfs. As usual, skip the checking process in the case
of json.
So one command can call this macro to do the checking process in its
end. At that time it need know json style or not, so add "json" parameter for
several related functions.
BTW, suppress the build warning of the macro `OSPF6_FIND_VRF_ARGS`:
"Macros starting with if should be enclosed by a do - while loop to avoid
possible if/else logic defects."
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <anlan_cs@tom.com>
Comparison of the two pointer is confusing, they have no relevance
except the time both of them are empty.
Additionly modify one variable name and correct some comment words, they
are same in both ospfd and ospf6d.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <anlan_cs@tom.com>
The OSPF6_LSA_UNAPPROVED flag is set in the function above
ospf6_lsa_translated_nssa_new, so there is no need to set
the flag again
Signed-off-by: ckishimo <carles.kishimoto@gmail.com>
When running topotest ospf6_topo2 we can see a log message with wrong lsa id
2021/12/20 23:14:40.330 OSPF6: [V8P0C-HB5Z2] ASBR[default:Status:3]: Update
2021/12/20 23:14:40.330 OSPF6: [Z489N-JAJ6P] ASBR[default:Status:3]: Already ASBR
2021/12/20 23:14:40.330 OSPF6: [Z9D0B-12SBJ] Redistribute 2001:db8:2::/64 (connected)
2021/12/20 23:14:40.330 OSPF6: [N66XP-ANN4G] Advertise as AS-External Id:8.70.41.177 prefix 2001:db8:2::/64 metric 2 (**)
2021/12/20 23:14:40.330 OSPF6: [K4Y9R-C22T6] Advertise new AS-External Id:0.0.0.3 prefix 2001:db8:2::/64 metric 2
2021/12/20 23:14:40.330 OSPF6: [PKX0N-KNRQR] Originate AS-External-LSA for 2001:db8:2::/64
This PR removes the log (instead of fixing it) as same information is printed
in the following entry
Signed-off-by: ckishimo <carles.kishimoto@gmail.com>
Since ospf6Enabled and attachedToArea are denoting the same thing.
It is decided to remove ospf6Enabled from json output to make
CLI and json output similar.
Fixes: #9286
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
RFC 3101 states both E-bit and N-bit need to be checked when receiving a Hello packet.
"To support the NSSA option an additional check must be made in the function
that handles the receiving of the Hello packet to verify that both the N-bit
and the E-bit found in the Hello packet's option field match the area type and
ExternalRoutingCapability of the area of the receiving interface."
This PR adds the check for the N-bit
Signed-off-by: ckishimo <carles.kishimoto@gmail.com>
The external_id_table was only ever used to store pointers to data
and was never used for lookup during the course of normal operations.
However it did lead to crashes because somewhere along the way
external routes stored in the external_table never had their
id associated into the external_id_table and we would assert
on the node lookup failing.
Since this code was never used for anything other than
storing data and it was never retrieved for anything useful
let's just remove it from ospf6d.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Since f60a1188 we store a pointer to the VRF in the interface structure.
There's no need anymore to store a separate vrf_id field.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
In a topology like:
r1(ASBR) ---- 0.0.0.0 ---- r2(ABR) ---- 1.1.1.1 -----r3
where r1 is redistributing statics and area 1.1.1.1 is NSSA, the ABR r2 should
not originate type-4 LSA into the NSSA area. From RFC 3101: "NSSA border routers
should not originate Type-4 summary-LSAs into their NSSAs."
This PR prevents the above LSA of being originated by the ABR r2
Signed-off-by: ckishimo <carles.kishimoto@gmail.com>
In a topology like:
r1 ---- 0.0.0.0 ---- r2(ABR) ---- 1.1.1.1 -----r3(ASBR)
where r3 is redistributing statics and area 1.1.1.1 is NSSA, the ABR r2 should
not originate type-4 LSA, according to RFC 3101, section 1.3:
"also an NSSA's border routers never originate Type-4 summary-LSAs for the
NSSA's AS boundary routers, since Type-7 AS-external-LSAs are never flooded
beyond the NSSA's border"
r1# sh ipv6 os database inter-router
Area Scoped Link State Database (Area 0.0.0.0)
Type LSId AdvRouter Age SeqNum Payload
IAR 3.3.3.3 2.2.2.2 49 80000001 3.3.3.3
This PR prevents the above LSA of being originated by the ABR r2
Signed-off-by: ckishimo <carles.kishimoto@gmail.com>
We should always treat the VRF interface as a loopback. Currently, this
is not the case, because in some old pre-VRF code we use if_is_loopback
instead of if_is_loopback_or_vrf. To avoid any future problems, the
proposal is to rename if_is_loopback_or_vrf to if_is_loopback and use it
everywhere. if_is_loopback is renamed to if_is_loopback_exact in case
it's ever needed, but currently it's not used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Using memcmp with complex structures like prefix or ospf6_ls_origin is
not correct, because even two structures with same values in all fields
may have different values in padding bytes and comparison will fail.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
As part of the check, it memcompares two structs ospf6_path. This struct
has a pointer field nh_list which is allocated every time a new path is
created, which means it can never be the same for two different paths.
Therefore this check is always false and can be completely removed.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
The adj_ok thread event is being added but not killed
when the underlying interface is deleted. I am seeing
this crash:
OSPF6: Received signal 11 at 1636142186 (si_addr 0x0, PC 0x561d7fc42285); aborting...
OSPF6: zlog_signal+0x18c 7f227e93519a 7ffdae024590 /lib/libfrr.so.0 (mapped at 0x7f227e884000)
OSPF6: core_handler+0xe3 7f227e97305e 7ffdae0246b0 /lib/libfrr.so.0 (mapped at 0x7f227e884000)
OSPF6: funlockfile+0x50 7f227e863140 7ffdae024800 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (mapped at 0x7f227e84f000)
OSPF6: ---- signal ----
OSPF6: need_adjacency+0x10 561d7fc42285 7ffdae024db0 /usr/lib/frr/ospf6d (mapped at 0x561d7fbc6000)
OSPF6: adj_ok+0x180 561d7fc42f0b 7ffdae024dc0 /usr/lib/frr/ospf6d (mapped at 0x561d7fbc6000)
OSPF6: thread_call+0xc2 7f227e989e32 7ffdae024e00 /lib/libfrr.so.0 (mapped at 0x7f227e884000)
OSPF6: frr_run+0x217 7f227e92a7f3 7ffdae024ec0 /lib/libfrr.so.0 (mapped at 0x7f227e884000)
OSPF6: main+0xf3 561d7fc0f573 7ffdae024fd0 /usr/lib/frr/ospf6d (mapped at 0x561d7fbc6000)
OSPF6: __libc_start_main+0xea 7f227e6b0d0a 7ffdae025010 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (mapped at 0x7f227e68a000)
OSPF6: _start+0x2a 561d7fc0f06a 7ffdae0250e0 /usr/lib/frr/ospf6d (mapped at 0x561d7fbc6000)
OSPF6: in thread adj_ok scheduled from ospf6d/ospf6_interface.c:678 dr_election()
The crash is in the on->ospf6_if pointer is NULL. The only way this could
happen from what I can tell is that the event is added to the system
and then we immediately delete the interface, removing the memory
but not freeing up the adj_ok thread event.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
I am seeing a crash of ospf6d with this stack trace:
OSPF6: Received signal 11 at 1636042827 (si_addr 0x0, PC 0x55efc2d09ec2); aborting...
OSPF6: zlog_signal+0x18c 7fe20c8ca19a 7ffd08035590 /lib/libfrr.so.0 (mapped at 0x7fe20c819000)
OSPF6: core_handler+0xe3 7fe20c90805e 7ffd080356b0 /lib/libfrr.so.0 (mapped at 0x7fe20c819000)
OSPF6: funlockfile+0x50 7fe20c7f8140 7ffd08035800 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (mapped at 0x7fe20c7e4000)
OSPF6: ---- signal ----
OSPF6: ospf6_neighbor_state_change+0xdc 55efc2d09ec2 7ffd08035d90 /usr/lib/frr/ospf6d (mapped at 0x55efc2c8e000)
OSPF6: exchange_done+0x15c 55efc2d0ab4a 7ffd08035dc0 /usr/lib/frr/ospf6d (mapped at 0x55efc2c8e000)
OSPF6: thread_call+0xc2 7fe20c91ee32 7ffd08035df0 /lib/libfrr.so.0 (mapped at 0x7fe20c819000)
OSPF6: frr_run+0x217 7fe20c8bf7f3 7ffd08035eb0 /lib/libfrr.so.0 (mapped at 0x7fe20c819000)
OSPF6: main+0xf3 55efc2cd7573 7ffd08035fc0 /usr/lib/frr/ospf6d (mapped at 0x55efc2c8e000)
OSPF6: __libc_start_main+0xea 7fe20c645d0a 7ffd08036000 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (mapped at 0x7fe20c61f000)
OSPF6: _start+0x2a 55efc2cd706a 7ffd080360d0 /usr/lib/frr/ospf6d (mapped at 0x55efc2c8e000)
OSPF6: in thread exchange_done scheduled from ospf6d/ospf6_message.c:2264 ospf6_dbdesc_send_newone()
The stack trace when decoded is:
(gdb) l *(ospf6_neighbor_state_change+0xdc)
0x7bec2 is in ospf6_neighbor_state_change (ospf6d/ospf6_neighbor.c:200).
warning: Source file is more recent than executable.
195 on->name, ospf6_neighbor_state_str[prev_state],
196 ospf6_neighbor_state_str[next_state],
197 ospf6_neighbor_event_string(event));
198 }
199
200 /* Optionally notify about adjacency changes */
201 if (CHECK_FLAG(on->ospf6_if->area->ospf6->config_flags,
202 OSPF6_LOG_ADJACENCY_CHANGES)
203 && (CHECK_FLAG(on->ospf6_if->area->ospf6->config_flags,
204 OSPF6_LOG_ADJACENCY_DETAIL)
OSPFv3 is creating the event without a managing thread and as such
if the event is not run before a deletion event comes in memory
will be freed up and we'll start trying to access memory we should
not. Modify ospfv3 to track the thread and appropriately stop
it when the memory is deleted or it is no longer need to run
that bit of code.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
in show: 'show ipv6 ospf6' handler command, the reason of SPF
executation is looked up and displayed. At startup, SPF has been
started, but shows no specific reason. Instead of dumping non
initialised string context, reset the string context.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Description:
Addressed the following TAINTED_SCALAR issue which can possibly
leads to memory currption.
1. *** CID 1506514: Insecure data handling (TAINTED_SddddddCALAR)
/ospf6d/ospf6_gr_helper.c: 1222 in ospf6_grace_lsa_show_info()
2. *** CID 1506513: Insecure data handling (TAINTED_SCALAR)
/ospf6d/ospf6_gr_helper.c: 160 in ospf6_extract_grace_lsa_fields()
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Girada <rgirada@vmware.com>
if_lookup_by_index_all_vrf doesn't work correctly with netns VRF backend
as the same index may be used in multiple netns simultaneously.
We always know the OSPF6 instance we work with, so use its VRF id for
the interface lookup.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Description:
code changes involve removal of increment and decrement operators
during function calls. These expressions make code less readable.
Signed-off-by: Manoj Naragund <mnaragund@vmware.com>
This removes a giant `switch { }` block from lib/zclient.c and
harmonizes all zclient callback function types to be the same (some had
a subset of the args, some had a void return, now they all have
ZAPI_CALLBACK_ARGS and int return.)
Apart from getting rid of the giant switch, this is a minor security
benefit since the function pointers are now in a `const` array, so they
can't be overwritten by e.g. heap overflows for code execution anymore.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>