Until now, it has been hard-coded that the position at which the label
is inserted is from the 64th bits. Therefore, when the Locator prefix
was not /64, incorrect SIDs were generated. Also, SIDs are generated
in duplicate on Lines 604 & 613 in bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c.
In this patch, the position where the label is inserted is calculated
based on the sum of block_bits_length and node_bits_length (i.e., the
user-specified Locator prefix length). In addition, SID generation is
performed at one location in alloc_new_sid.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro MIKI <nmiki@yahoo-corp.jp>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7947#section-2.2
Optional recognized and unrecognized BGP attributes,
whether transitive or non-transitive, SHOULD NOT be updated by the
route server (unless enforced by local IXP operator configuration)
and SHOULD be passed on to other route server clients.
By default LB ext-community works with iBGP peers. When we receive a route
from eBGP peer, we can send LB ext-community to iBGP peers.
With this patch, allow sending LB ext-community to iBGP/eBGP peers if they
are set as RS clients.
FRR does not send non-transitive ext-communities to eBGP peers, but for
example GoBGP sends and if it's set as RS client, we should pass those attributes
towards another RS client.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Remove unnecessary `install_l3nhg` knob because it has already
been controlled by the command: "[no$no] use-es-l3nhg".
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
Currently the warning is wrong:
```
root#show bgp vrf default vni
BGP instance for VRF default not foundACC1(config)#
```
Two changes for "show bgp vrf VRFNAME vni [json]":
- Correct the default VRF check
- Add newline for warning
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
Description:
- When default route is originated using the
neighbor default-originate command, MED is
not set as part of the update message
attribute.
- Changes are done to set the MED value and MED
flag for default route.
Co-authored-by: Abhinay Ramesh <rabhinay@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Iqra Siddiqui <imujeebsiddi@vmware.com>
frr(config-if)# ip igmp join 232.1.1.1 10.10.10.10
frr(config-if)# do sh ip igmp sources
Interface Address Group Source Timer Fwd Uptime
ens192 232.1.1.1 10.10.10.10 04:10 N 00:00:10
frr(config-if)#
The above output is misaligned and is having Address field which is not
required here.
Fixing it.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
The test is testing whether interface flaps are causing
the appropriate pim reactions. Unfortunately the test
is turning off the multicast stream and the test also
has a keep alive timer of 15 seconds set on all routers.
Which of course means the test has 15 seconds(at most) to finish
testing. This is not always possible given system loads.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The test_multicast_pim_sm_topo3.py test is both spending extra time
looking for state that will never occurr but also generating a support
bundle when it doesn't find it. Fix the test to come to the correct
solution faster.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Correct flag name of `attr.es_flags` - ATTR_ES_L3_NHG_USE.
"bgp_path_info"s (Per "es-vrf") with this flag can use l3nhg.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
Add a test case where a kernel route depends on a kernel route
and when you perturb an interface, ensure that FRR does not
loose the route.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Currently if a end user has something like this:
Routing entry for 192.168.212.1/32
Known via "kernel", distance 0, metric 100, best
Last update 00:07:50 ago
* directly connected, ens5
Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP,
O - OSPF, I - IS-IS, B - BGP, E - EIGRP, N - NHRP,
T - Table, v - VNC, V - VNC-Direct, A - Babel, F - PBR,
f - OpenFabric,
> - selected route, * - FIB route, q - queued, r - rejected, b - backup
t - trapped, o - offload failure
K>* 0.0.0.0/0 [0/100] via 192.168.212.1, ens5, src 192.168.212.19, 00:00:15
C>* 192.168.212.0/27 is directly connected, ens5, 00:07:50
K>* 192.168.212.1/32 [0/100] is directly connected, ens5, 00:07:50
And FRR does a link flap, it refigures the route and rejects the default
route:
2022/04/09 16:38:20 ZEBRA: [NZNZ4-7P54Y] default(0:254):0.0.0.0/0: Processing rn 0x56224dbb5b00
2022/04/09 16:38:20 ZEBRA: [ZJVZ4-XEGPF] default(0:254):0.0.0.0/0: Examine re 0x56224dbddc20 (kernel) status: Changed Installed flags: Selected dist 0 metric 100
2022/04/09 16:38:20 ZEBRA: [GG8QH-195KE] nexthop_active_update: re 0x56224dbddc20 nhe 0x56224dbdd950 (7), curr_nhe 0x56224dedb550
2022/04/09 16:38:20 ZEBRA: [T9JWA-N8HM5] nexthop_active_check: re 0x56224dbddc20, nexthop 192.168.212.1, via ens5
2022/04/09 16:38:20 ZEBRA: [M7EN1-55BTH] nexthop_active: Route Type kernel has not turned on recursion
2022/04/09 16:38:20 ZEBRA: [HJ48M-MB610] nexthop_active_check: Unable to find active nexthop
2022/04/09 16:38:20 ZEBRA: [JPJF4-TGCY5] default(0:254):0.0.0.0/0: After processing: old_selected 0x56224dbddc20 new_selected 0x0 old_fib 0x56224dbddc20 new_fib 0x0
So the 192.168.212.1 route is matched for the nexthop but it is not connected and
zebra treats it as a problem. Modify the code such that if a system route
matches through another system route, then it should work imo.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
