Effectively a massive search and replace of
`struct thread` to `struct event`. Using the
term `thread` gives people the thought that
this event system is a pthread when it is not
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This is a first in a series of commits, whose goal is to rename
the thread system in FRR to an event system. There is a continual
problem where people are confusing `struct thread` with a true
pthread. In reality, our entire thread.c is an event system.
In this commit rename the thread.[ch] files to event.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
1. Removal of IPV6_HDRINCL option
2. Removal of IPv6 headers in TX
3. Addition of IPV6_PKTINFO and setting of source ipv6 address for TX.
Signed-off-by: Balaji Gurudoss <G_Balaji1@dell.com>
This is causing build issues on BSD by including (transitively)
`linux/mroute6.h` - try to address by disentangling the headers a bunch.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
The only function these macros have is to make the code confusing.
"PIM_IF_DO_PIM" sounds like it triggers some action, but it doesn't.
Replace with "bool" fields in struct pim_interface.
(Note: PIM_IF_*_IGMP_LISTEN_ALLROUTERS was always set, without any way
to unset it. It is completely removed now and always enabled.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
... this shouldn't run for IPv6. (We'll switch to not using
IPV6_HDRINCL later, so the kernel will handle it, but for the time being
let's just stop trying to use the IPv4 code for IPv6.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
IPV6_HDRINCL is a TX-only option (unlike IP_HDRINCL), so on RX there
never are IPv6 headers to be looked at / skipped over.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
socket changes to support IPv6 PIM
Signed-off-by: Balaji Gurudoss <G_Balaji1@dell.com>
[DL: cleaned up & refactored a whole bunch more.]
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Based on compiler option, pim_addr will be changed to in_addr
or in6_addr for pimd and pim6d respectively.
Reviewed-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
We should always treat the VRF interface as a loopback. Currently, this
is not the case, because in some old pre-VRF code we use if_is_loopback
instead of if_is_loopback_or_vrf. To avoid any future problems, the
proposal is to rename if_is_loopback_or_vrf to if_is_loopback and use it
everywhere. if_is_loopback is renamed to if_is_loopback_exact in case
it's ever needed, but currently it's not used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
Problem Statement:
==================
pim maintains two counters hello tx and hello rx at interface level.
At present pim needs to send the hello message prior to other pim
message as per RFC. This logic is getting derived from the tx hello
counters. So when a new neighbor is added, tx counters are set to
zero and then based on this, it is further decided to send hello in
pim_hello_require function.
Fix:
====
Separating the hello statistics and the logic to decide when to send hello
based on a new flag. pim_ifstat_hello_sent will be used to note down
the hello stats while a new flag is added to decide whether to send hello
or not if it is the first packet to a neighbor.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
Problem
======
In pim_msg_send_frame api, the while loop was executed only once.
Fix
===
while is changed to if, as in the code flow
the while part is getting executed only once.
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
VRF creation can happen from either cli or from
knowledged about the vrf learned from zebra.
In the case where we learn about the vrf from
the cli, the vrf id is UNKNOWN. Upon actual
creation of the vrf, lib/vrf.c touches up the vrf_id
and calls pim_vrf_enable to turn it on properly.
At this point in time we have a pim->vrf_id of
UNKNOWN and the vrf->vrf_id of the right value.
There is no point in duplicating this data. So just
remove all pim->vrf_id and use the vrf->vrf_id instead
since we keep a copy of the pim->vrf pointer.
This will remove some crashes where we expect the
pim->vrf_id to be usable and it's not.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Replace all `random()` calls with a function called `frr_weak_random()`
and make it clear that it is only supposed to be used for weak random
applications.
Use the annotation described by the Coverity Scan documentation to
ignore `random()` call warnings.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
This is as per RFC. This is identified when conformance suite catched join.
RCA:
Packets were processed without checking allowed dest IP for that packet.
Fix:
Added check for dest IP
Converted this check to a function
Signed-off-by: Saravanan K <saravanank@vmware.com>
RCA: Upstreams which are in register state other than noinfo, doesnt remove
register tunnel from oif after it becomes nonDR
Fix: scan upstreams with iif as the old dr and check if couldReg becomes false.
If couldreg becomes false from true, remove regiface and stop reg timer.
Do not disturb the entry. Later the entry shall be removed by kat expiry.
Signed-off-by: Saravanan K <saravanank@vmware.com>
RCA: This was todo item in current code base
Fix: Hello sent with 0 hold time before we update the pim ifp primary address
Signed-off-by: Saravanan K <saravanank@vmware.com>
If a register packet is received that is less than the PIM_MSG_REGISTER_LEN
in size we can have a possible situation where the data being
checksummed is just random data from the buffer we read into.
2019/11/18 21:45:46 warnings: PIM: int pim_if_add_vif(struct interface *, _Bool, _Bool): could not get address for interface fuzziface ifindex=0
==27636== Invalid read of size 4
==27636== at 0x4E6EB0D: in_cksum (checksum.c:28)
==27636== by 0x4463CC: pim_pim_packet (pim_pim.c:194)
==27636== by 0x40E2B4: main (pim_main.c:117)
==27636== Address 0x771f818 is 0 bytes after a block of size 24 alloc'd
==27636== at 0x4C2FB0F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==27636== by 0x40E261: main (pim_main.c:112)
==27636==
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
This will facilitate the Hardware to prefer control packets over
Normal Data packets while queuing, so that during congestion, the
chance of dropping control packet will be minimised.
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Kumar K <sathk@cumulusnetworks.com>
1. Packet validation as per RFC 5059 Sec 3.1.3
We won't supporting scope zone BSM as of now, they are dropped now.
Order of the check slightly be changed in code for optimization.
if ((DirectlyConnected(BSM.src_ip_address) == FALSE) OR
(we have no Hello state for BSM.src_ip_address)) {
drop the Bootstrap message silently
}
if (BSM.dst_ip_address == ALL-PIM-ROUTERS) {
if (BSM.no_forward_bit == 0) {
if (BSM.src_ip_address != RPF_neighbor(BSM.BSR_ip_address)) {
drop the Bootstrap message silently
}
} else if ((any previous BSM for this scope has been accepted) OR
(more than BS_Period has elapsed since startup)) {
#only accept no-forward BSM if quick refresh on startup
drop the Bootstrap message silently
}
} else if ((Unicast BSM support enabled) AND
(BSM.dst_ip_address is one of my addresses)) {
if ((any previous BSM for this scope has been accepted) OR
(more than BS_Period has elapsed since startup)) {
#the packet was unicast, but this wasn't
#a quick refresh on startup
drop the Bootstrap message silently
}
} else {
drop the Bootstrap message silently
}
2. Nexthop tracking registration for BSR
3. RPF check for BSR Message.
Zebra Lookup based rpf check for new BSR
NHT cache(pnc) based lookup for old BSR
Signed-off-by: Saravanan K <saravanank@vmware.com>
This commit includes parsing of Nbit and contructing pim hdr with Nbit
Adding Nbit to PIm hdr structure
Adding Scope zone bit and Bidir bit to Encoded IPv4 Group Address
Signed-off-by: Saravanan K <saravanank@vmware.com>
