When inserting to the front of a list with listnode_add_head
if the list is empty, the tail will not be properly set and
subsuquent calls to insert/remove will cause the function
to crash.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
FRR does not use the NLM_F_APPEND semantics ( in fact I would argue that
the NLM_F_APPEND semantics just introduce pain for all parties involved )
I would also argue that most people who use the kernel netlink api
have recognized that NLM_F_APPEND for a route is a recipe for disaster
that is well documented and as such it is not used as anything other
than a curiousity by operators.
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337855https://github.com/thom311/libnl/issues/226
Are 2 great examples of how confusing it is for anyone in user
space to know what the correct thing to do is. Given that
new fields can be added with no semantics to allow us to know
what has resulted in a change or not.
In an attempt to recognize this, let's note that FRR
believes it has gotten out of sync with the kernel.
Future commits will react to the desynchronized route
and request from the kernel a reload of that specific
route if possible.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Currently the bgp mib specifies two traps:
a) Into established state
b) transition backwards from a state
b) really is an interesting case. It means transitioning
from say established to starting over. It can also
mean when bgp is trying to connect and that fails and
the state transitions backwards.
Now let's imagine 500 peers with tight timers (say a data center)
and there is network trauma you have just created an inordinately
large number of traps for each peer.
Let's limit FRR to changing from the old status as Established
to something else. This will greatly limit the trap but it
will also be something end operators are actually interested in.
I actually had several operators say they had to write special code
to ignore all the backward state transitions that they didn't care
about.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When any `service ...` line is entered and there are multiple
daemons running prevent this from being displayed multiple times.
Fixes: #5475
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The event system when executing a thread already
sets the pointer of it to NULL. No need to
do it again.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
In the case of without ':' in `ecom_str`, memleak on this `ecom_str` will
occur. Just free `ecom_str` for this case.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
If a operator receives an invalid packet that is of insufficient size
then it is possible for BGP to assert during reading of the packet
instead of gracefully resetting the connection with the peer.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
In "rtnetlink.h", four items are a group, e.g. 116/117/118/119 should be
a group. But "RTM_SETHWFLAGS" is not in use and has nothing to do with
"NEXTHOPBUCKET".
After comparing with kernel header, better remove it imo.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
"on-shutdown" and "on-startup" have the different timeout range.
Correct the timeout range for "on-shutdown" based on the current code:
```
(ospf) max-metric router-lsa on-shutdown (5-100)
```
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
This commit changes `seg6local_context2str()` to use `%pI6`/`%pI4`
instead of `inet_ntop` to print the SRv6 seg6local context information.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
This commit changes some debug prints to use `%pI6` instead of
`inet_ntop` to print SRv6 SIDs.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()` is a wrapper around the `XFREE()` macro.
Passing a NULL pointer to `XFREE()` is safe. Therefore, checking that
the pointer passed to the `srv6_locator_chunk_free()` is not null is
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()` takes care of freeing the memory allocated
for a `struct srv6_locator_chunk` and setting the
`struct srv6_locator_chunk` pointer to NULL.
It is not necessary to explicitly set the pointer to NULL after invoking
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()`.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
A programmer can use the `srv6_locator_chunk_free()` function to free
the memory allocated for a `struct srv6_locator_chunk`.
The programmer invokes `srv6_locator_chunk_free()` by passing a single
pointer to the `struct srv6_locator_chunk` to be freed.
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()` uses `XFREE()` to free the memory.
It is the responsibility of the programmer to set the
`struct srv6_locator_chunk` pointer to NULL after freeing memory with
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()`.
This commit modifies the `srv6_locator_chunk_free()` function to take a
double pointer instead of a single pointer. In this way, setting the
`struct srv6_locator_chunk` pointer to NULL is no longer the
programmer's responsibility but is the responsibility of
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()`. This prevents programmers from making
mistakes such as forgetting to set the pointer to NULL after invoking
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()`.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
