The problem was happening because the ospf->oiflist has this behaviour, each interface was removed and added at the end of the list in each ospf_network_run_subnet call, generation an infinite loop.
As a solution, a copy of the list was generated and we interacted with a fixed list.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Nardi <rnardi@netdef.org>
BGP is storing outgoing updates in a couple of different
fifo's. This is to ensure proper packet packing of
all bgp_dests that happen to use the same attribute.
How it's all put together currently: On initial update
BGP walks through all the bgp_dest's in a table. For each
path being sent a bgp_advertise is created. This bgp_advertise
is placed in fifo order on the bgp_synchronize->update queue.
The bgp_advertise has a pointer to the bgp_advertise_attr which
is associated iwth the actual attribute that is being sent to
it's peer. In turn this bgp_advertise is placed in a fifo off
of the bgp_advertise_attr structure. As such as we have paths
that share an attribute, the path/dest is placed on the
bgp_syncrhonize->update fifo as well as being placed on the fifo
associated with the advertised attribute.
On actual creation of a packet. The first item in the
bgp_synchronize->update fifo is popped. The bgp_advertise_attr
pointer is grabbed, we fill out the nlri part of the bgp packet
and then walk the bgp_advertise_attr fifo to place paths/dests in
the packet. As each path/dest is placed in the packet it is removed
from both the bgp_synchronize->update fifo and the bgp_advertise_attr
fifo.
The whole point of this change is to switch the *next, *prev
pointers in the bgp_advertise structure with a typesafe data
structure.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
`ng` was not properly freed, leading to a memory leak.
The commit calls `nexthop_group_delete` to free memory associated with `ng`.
The ASan leak log for reference:
```
***********************************************************************************
Address Sanitizer Error detected in isis_topo1.test_isis_topo1/r5.asan.zebra.24308
=================================================================
==24308==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 32 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f4f47b43d28 in __interceptor_calloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xded28)
#1 0x7f4f4753c0a8 in qcalloc lib/memory.c:105
#2 0x7f4f47559526 in nexthop_group_new lib/nexthop_group.c:270
#3 0x562ded6a39d4 in zebra_add_import_table_entry zebra/redistribute.c:681
#4 0x562ded787c35 in rib_link zebra/zebra_rib.c:3972
#5 0x562ded787c35 in rib_addnode zebra/zebra_rib.c:3993
#6 0x562ded787c35 in process_subq_early_route_add zebra/zebra_rib.c:2860
#7 0x562ded787c35 in process_subq_early_route zebra/zebra_rib.c:3138
#8 0x562ded787c35 in process_subq zebra/zebra_rib.c:3178
#9 0x562ded787c35 in meta_queue_process zebra/zebra_rib.c:3228
#10 0x7f4f475f7118 in work_queue_run lib/workqueue.c:266
#11 0x7f4f475dc7f2 in event_call lib/event.c:1969
#12 0x7f4f4751f347 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1213
#13 0x562ded69e818 in main zebra/main.c:486
#14 0x7f4f468ffc86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21c86)
Indirect leak of 152 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f4f47b43d28 in __interceptor_calloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xded28)
#1 0x7f4f4753c0a8 in qcalloc lib/memory.c:105
#2 0x7f4f475510ad in nexthop_new lib/nexthop.c:376
#3 0x7f4f475539c5 in nexthop_dup lib/nexthop.c:914
#4 0x7f4f4755b27a in copy_nexthops lib/nexthop_group.c:444
#5 0x562ded6a3a1c in zebra_add_import_table_entry zebra/redistribute.c:682
#6 0x562ded787c35 in rib_link zebra/zebra_rib.c:3972
#7 0x562ded787c35 in rib_addnode zebra/zebra_rib.c:3993
#8 0x562ded787c35 in process_subq_early_route_add zebra/zebra_rib.c:2860
#9 0x562ded787c35 in process_subq_early_route zebra/zebra_rib.c:3138
#10 0x562ded787c35 in process_subq zebra/zebra_rib.c:3178
#11 0x562ded787c35 in meta_queue_process zebra/zebra_rib.c:3228
#12 0x7f4f475f7118 in work_queue_run lib/workqueue.c:266
#13 0x7f4f475dc7f2 in event_call lib/event.c:1969
#14 0x7f4f4751f347 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1213
#15 0x562ded69e818 in main zebra/main.c:486
#16 0x7f4f468ffc86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21c86)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 184 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
***********************************************************************************
```
Signed-off-by: Keelan Cannoo <keelan.cannoo@icloud.com>
Now OSPF6 shares the /128 prefix by default. Adjusting the expected
number of next hops according to that.
Signed-off-by: Adriano Marto Reis <adrianomarto@gmail.com>
* Check if FRR is running
* Check if OSPFv3 converges
* Check OSPFv3 Routing Tables
* Check Linux Kernel Routing Table
Signed-off-by: Adriano Marto Reis <adrianomarto@gmail.com>
To announce connected prefixes, or not to announce connected prefixes,
that is the question...
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
This adds the PtMP interface type, which is effectively identical to PtP
except that all the database flooding & updates are unicast.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Some lower layers still don't handle multicast correctly (or
efficiently.) Add option to send unicast hellos on explicitly
configured neighbors for PtP/PtMP.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
With the configured neighbor list, unicast hellos can be sent. Allow
disabling multicast hellos for that scenario.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
This adds a knob to refuse forming adjacencies with neighbors not listed
in the config. Only works on PtP/PtMP of course, otherwise the DR/BDR
machinery gets broken.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Add a list of configured neighbors for each interface. Only stores cost
(and "existence") for now.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
For PtMP the cost may need to be recalculated when the LL addr changes
(since neighbors are configured by LL addr and a different entry with a
different cost may match.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Both for virtual links and correct PtMP operation, advertising local
addresses as Intra-Prefix with LA set is a prerequisite. Add the
appropriate entries.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
When netlink_link_change() errors out for a new link for
interface without MTU set, the allocated ctx is not freed..
Adding code for correctness
Ticket# 3628313
Signed-off-by: Rajasekar Raja <rajasekarr@nvidia.com>
Currently when one interface changes its VRF, zebra will send these messages to
all daemons in *order*:
1) `ZEBRA_INTERFACE_DELETE` ( notify them delete from old VRF )
2) `ZEBRA_INTERFACE_VRF_UPDATE` ( notify them move from old to new VRF )
3) `ZEBRA_INTERFACE_ADD` ( notify them added into new VRF )
When daemons deal with `VRF_UPDATE`, they use
`zebra_interface_vrf_update_read()->if_lookup_by_name()`
to check the interface exist or not in old VRF. This check will always return
*NULL* because `DELETE` ( deleted from old VRF ) is already done, so can't
find this interface in old VRF.
Send `VRF_UPDATE` is redundant and unuseful. `DELETE` and `ADD` are enough,
they will deal with RB tree, so don't send this `VRF_UPDATE` message when
vrf changes.
Since all daemons have good mechanism to deal with changing vrf, and don't
use this `VRF_UPDATE` mechanism. So, it is safe to completely remove
all the code with `VRF_UPDATE`.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <anlan_cs@tom.com>
At each EBGP boundary, BGP path attributes are modified as per [RFC4271], which includes stripping any IBGP-only attributes.
Some networks span more than one autonomous system and require more flexibility in the propagation of path attributes. It is worth noting that these multi-AS networks have a common or single administrative entity. These networks are said to belong to One Administrative Domain (OAD). It is desirable to carry IBGP-only attributes across EBGP peerings when the peers belong to an OAD.
This document defines a new EBGP peering type known as EBGP-OAD, which is used between two EBGP peers that belong to an OAD. This document also defines rules for route announcement and processing for EBGP-OAD peers.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-oad
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Include a zclient value in the hash and tree key computations
for iprules in zebra: clients may collide without this.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@labn.net>
The iprule/pbr rule object has a vrf id, and zebra uses
that internally, but the vrf id isn't returned to clients
who install rules and are waiting for results. Include the
vrf_id sent by the client in the zapi result notification
message; update the existing clients so they decode the id.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@labn.net>
Don't hard-code a sharpd nhg id: those values aren't stable
if the daemons/protos/route-types change. Use json show output
to find the id in the 'resilient' nhg test case in
the all_protocol_startup suite.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@labn.net>
XSTRDUP and then calling strsep mangles the
pointer returned by XSTRDUP. Keep a copy
of the orig and when we are done, free that instead.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Indicating the configured PIM Rendezvous Point (RP) in the MSDP SA
message
The RFC-3618, section 12.2.1, describes the fields included in the MSDP
SA message. The "RP address" field is "the address of the RP in the
domain the source has become active in".
In the most common case, we will establish an MSDP connection from RP to
RP. However, there are cases where we want to establish a MSDP
connection from an interface/address that is not the RP. Section 3 of
RFC-3618 describes that scenario as "intermediate MSDP peer". Moreover,
the RP could be another router in the PIM domain - not the one
establishing the MSDP connection.
The current implementation could be problematic even with a single
router per PIM domain. Consider the following scenario:
* There are two PIM domains, each one with a single router.
* The two routers are connected via two independent networks. Let's say
that is to provide redundancy.
* The routers are configured to establish two MSDP connections, one on
each network (redundancy again).
* A multicast source becomes active on the router 1. It will be
communicated to router 2 via two independent MSDP SA messages, one per
MSDP connection.
* Without these changes, each MSDP SA message will indicate a different
RP.
* Both RP addresses will pass the RPF check, and both MSDP sources will
be accepted.
* If the router has clients interested in that multicast group, it will
send PIM Join messages to both RPs and start receiving the multicast
traffic from both.
With the changes included in this commit, the multicast source available
in router 1 would still be communicated to router 2 twice. But both MSDP
SA messages would indicate the same RP, and one of them would be
discarded due to failure in the RPF-check failure. Also, the changes
allow us to define the RP that will be included in the MSDP SA message,
and it could be one of the interfaces used to establish the MSDP
connection, some other interface on the router, a loopback interface, or
another router in the PIM domain.
These changes should not create compatibility issues. As I mentioned, we
usually establish MSDP connections from RP to RP. In this case, the
result will be the same. We would still indicate the address used to
establish the MSDP connection if the RP is not set - I wonder if that
should even be a valid configuration.
Signed-off-by: Adriano Marto Reis <adrianomarto@gmail.com>
