A route where ESI, GW IP, MAC and Label are all zero at the same time SHOULD
be treat-as-withdraw.
Invalid MAC addresses are broadcast or multicast MAC addresses. The route
MUST be treat-as-withdraw in case of an invalid MAC address.
As FRR support Ethernet NVO Tunnels only.
Route will be withdrawn when ESI, GW IP and MAC are zero or Invalid MAC
Test cases:
1) ET-5 route with valid RMAC extended community
2) ET-5 route no RMAC extended community
3) ET-5 route with Multicast MAC in RMAC extended community
4) ET-5 route with Broadcast MAC in RMAC extended community
Signed-off-by: Kishore Aramalla <karamalla@vmware.com>
Today vtysh can show the ip/ip6 routes through several commands:
- show_route_cmd
- show_route_detail_cmd
- show_route_summary_cmd
- show_route_table_cmd
- show_route_table_vrf_cmd
- show_route_all_table_vrf_cmd
Each command has its own set of filter rules:
- show_route_cmd can filter by vrf, protocol, tag, ... but not by table
- show_route_table_cmd always filter by table
- show_route_table_vrf_cmd always filter by table and can filter by vrf
too
- show_route_all_table_vrf_cmd show all route in any table for a vrf (or
all)
To reduce the number of commands and provide a possibility to filter by
any key add possibility for the show_route_cmd to filter by table with a
specific value or all to get route in all tables.
Then the show_route_table_cmd, show_route_table_vrf_cmd and
show_route_all_table_vrf_cmd functions can be removed as they are covered
by the generic show_route_cmd function.
It is to be noted that when zebra is started by default, it is possible
to execute show ip route command with both vrf and table parameters,
whereas before the command was not displayed. This is due to the fact
that this combination is only permitted when zebra is launched with vrf
network namespace mode. There, if zebra is configured with vrf-lite
backend, then a vty error message informs the user that the combination
of both table and vrf is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Thibaut Collet <thibaut.collet@6wind.com>
Current failed reasons for bgp when you have a peer that
is not online yet is `Waiting for NHT`, even if NHT has
succeeded. Add some code to differentiate this.
eva# show bgp ipv4 uni summ failed
BGP router identifier 192.168.201.135, local AS number 3923 vrf-id 0
BGP table version 0
RIB entries 0, using 0 bytes of memory
Peers 2, using 43 KiB of memory
Neighbor EstdCnt DropCnt ResetTime Reason
192.168.44.1 0 0 never Waiting for NHT
192.168.201.139 0 0 never Waiting for Open to Succeed
Total number of neighbors 2
eva#
eva# show bgp nexthop
Current BGP nexthop cache:
192.168.44.1 invalid, peer 192.168.44.1
Must be Connected
Last update: Mon Feb 10 19:05:19 2020
192.168.201.139 valid [IGP metric 0], #paths 0, peer 192.168.201.139
So 192.168.201.139 is a peer for a connected route that has not been
created on .139, while 44.1 nexthop tracking has not succeeded yet.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The existing behavior is when a remote VTEP is deleted,
its associatedneighbor (arp) and MAC entries are removed from
zebra database and do not wait for explicit type-2 route
withdraw from originating VTEP.
Remote type-2 route delete checks if VTEP is present before
removing the entry.
The behavior works fine when all evpn routes points to the
same nexthop as the VTEP IP.
In MLAG topology with advertise-pip, self type-2 and type-5 routes
are advertised with individual VTEP IP as nexthop ip for the route.
When a new VNI is created, it is assigned individual IP as tunnel-ip
then it transition to anycast IP (of the MLAG). During the transition,
type-3 route (VTEP delete) withdraw is sent for the individual IP.
The remote VTEP delete should not trigger to remove evpn routes pointing
to VTEP IP. Instead the route will be removed via explicit withdraw.
Ticket:CM-27752
Reviewed By:CCR-9722
Testing Done:
In evpn with MLAG deployment with advertise-pip and advertise-svi-ip
enabled, validated remote vtep delete does not remove self type-2 routes
from zebra DB. Upon explicit type-2 withdraw routes are removed.
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@cumulusnetworks.com>
RCA:
When we install IPv6 prefix imported from EVPN RT-5 in vrf, nexthop of the IPv6
route should be IPv4 mapped IPv6 address. In function
install_evpn_route_entry_in_vrf, we generate a new attribute with IPv4 mapped
IPv6 nexthop, but we use parent->attr while creating the actual route.
Thus, Ipv4 nexthop is assigned to this route.
Because of this incorrect nexthop, we observed a crash in function
update_ipv6nh_for_route_install.
Fix:
Pass the new attribute with Ipv4 mapped Ipv6 nexthop to
bgp_create_evpn_bgp_path_info
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
For some reason we are getting a compile error around a variable I didn't
touch in the other commits. Make it happy.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
There is no need to have a temp variable to then store that
data in another temporary variable.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The new_afi and afi were being used over and over. Switch
to the end result we want and just use that from the get go.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The creation of a prefix pointer is unnecessary. Save the
prefix as part of the actual data structure. This will
reduce the data needed by 8 bytes per nexthop stored.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Multi instance ospf support was broken due to PR #4564.
Adding fix back and extra checks to support multi instance
OSPF.
Fixes issues #5343 & #5741
Signed-off-by: Santosh P K <sapk@vmware.com>
Copy the fix made in 'lib/if.c' to 'lib/routemap_northbound.c' so we can
have a working YANG model when compiled with GCC version less than 5.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7606 some of the attributes
MUST be handled as "treat-as-withdraw" approach.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
