Implement the below 2 CLIs to clear the current data in the process
and neighbor data structure.
1. clear ip ospf process
2. clear ip ospf neighbor
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
The current securing BGP and resource certification reference links lead
to a page not found. This patch fixes that by pointing to their
corresponding PDF format resources.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Goncalves <cgoncalves@redhat.com>
Updated the documentation clarifying that multiple addresses can be
specifyed via -l option.
Signed-off-by: "Adriano Marto Reis" <adrianomarto@gmail.com>
This command has been added in the context of
PIM BSM functionality. This command will clear the
data structs having bsr information.
Co-authored-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: vishaldhingra <vdhingra@vmware.com>
This new dynamic module makes pathd behave as a PCC for dynamic candidate path
using the external library pcpelib https://github.com/volta-networks/pceplib .
The candidate paths defined as dynamic will trigger computation requests to the
configured PCE, and the PCE response will be used to update the policy.
It supports multiple PCE. The one with smaller precedence will be elected
as the master PCE, and only if the connection repeatedly fails, the PCC will
switch to another PCE.
Example of configuration:
segment-routing
traffic-eng
pcep
pce-config CONF
source-address ip 10.10.10.10
sr-draft07
!
pce PCE1
config CONF
address ip 1.1.1.1
!
pce PCE2
config CONF
address ip 2.2.2.2
!
pcc
peer PCE1 precedence 10
peer PCE2 precedence 20
!
!
!
!
Co-authored-by: Brady Johnson <brady@voltanet.io>
Co-authored-by: Emanuele Di Pascale <emanuele@voltanet.io>
Co-authored-by: GalaxyGorilla <sascha@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Javier Garcia <javier.garcia@voltanet.io>
Co-authored-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Co-authored-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
This new daemon manages Segment-Routing Traffic-Engineering
(SR-TE) Policies and installs them into zebra. It provides
the usual yang support and vtysh commands to define or change
SR-TE Policies.
In a nutshell SR-TE Policies provide the possibility to steer
traffic through a (possibly dynamic) list of Segment Routing
segments to the endpoint of the policy. This list of segments
is part of a Candidate Path which again belongs to the SR-TE
Policy. SR-TE Policies are uniquely identified by their color
and endpoint. The color can be used to e.g. match BGP
communities on incoming traffic.
There can be multiple Candidate Paths for a single
policy, the active Candidate Path is chosen according to
certain conditions of which the most important is its
preference. Candidate Paths can be explicit (fixed list of
segments) or dynamic (list of segment comes from e.g. PCEP, see
below).
Configuration example:
segment-routing
traffic-eng
segment-list SL
index 10 mpls label 1111
index 20 mpls label 2222
!
policy color 4 endpoint 10.10.10.4
name POL4
binding-sid 104
candidate-path preference 100 name exp explicit segment-list SL
candidate-path preference 200 name dyn dynamic
!
!
!
There is an important connection between dynamic Candidate
Paths and the overall topic of Path Computation. Later on for
pathd a dynamic module will be introduced that is capable
of communicating via the PCEP protocol with a PCE (Path
Computation Element) which again is capable of calculating
paths according to its local TED (Traffic Engineering Database).
This dynamic module will be able to inject the mentioned
dynamic Candidate Paths into pathd based on calculated paths
from a PCE.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-06
Co-authored-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Co-authored-by: GalaxyGorilla <sascha@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Emanuele Di Pascale <emanuele@voltanet.io>
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Update these two daemons to include the new
ability for both bgp and sharpd to send extra informational
data to zebra.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Rename "debug isis ti-lfa" to "debug isis lfa". Having different
debug guards for different kinds of LFA (classic, remote and TI-LFA)
doesn't make sense since all LFA solutions share code to certain
extent.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
The bgpd --listenon option implies --no_kernel. This commit makes note
of that in the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Bøhn Grytemark <mathias@grytemark.no>
