Add pytest marking for ospfd. This commit also has some other test markings
because I do not want to have to go through the same test multiple times.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Add the ability for our topotests to take advantage of pytest `mark`ing.
This effectively allows you to tell pytest to run against certain sets
of tests. For a demonstration purpose I've added in marks for:
babel
eigrp
ldp
ospf
pim
rip
And setup tests to run against those tests that only test those protocols.
You can run against eigrp tests by running `pytest -k eigrp`
Other combinations are also available based upon simple boolean logic.
Just read the pytest.mark documentation.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Now that topotest was integrated into the FRR repository, we
don't need to worry anymore about creating tests that work across
different FRR versions. The topotests present on any branch need
to be compatible only with the FRR daemons from that same branch.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
- Generic Debian only has a single space in front of “proto” in the linux shell routing outptu
Signed-off-by: Martin Winter <mwinter@opensourcerouting.org>
PR #1213 in FRR changed the protocol of installed LSPs. To avoid breaking
older outstanding Pull Requests, remove the protocol check.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
If daemon crashed at a later stage (not startup), then the test scripts didn't properly detect it and report unpredictable errors. This will properly log the daemon crashes
Signed-off-by: Martin Winter <mwinter@opensourcerouting.org>
* Added test to check for version
* Adopted all tests to verify against the correct version of output
Signed-off-by: Martin Winter <mwinter@opensourcerouting.org>
