```
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# neighbor 192.168.100.3 remote-as external
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# do sh run | include extended
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# neighbor 192.168.100.3 capability extended-nexthop
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# do sh run | include extended
neighbor 192.168.100.3 capability extended-nexthop
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# no neighbor 192.168.100.3 capability extended-nexthop
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# do sh run | include extended
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# neighbor eth0 interface remote-as external
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# do sh run | include extended
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# neighbor eth0 capability extended-nexthop
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# do sh run | include extended
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# no neighbor eth0 capability extended-nexthop
exit1-debian-11(config-router)# do sh run | include extended
no neighbor eth0 capability extended-nexthop
exit1-debian-11(config-router)#
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
The current maximum-prefix-out topo-test starts a configuration with a
maximum-prefix-out.
Test the application of new maximum-prefix-out value without clearing
the neighbor.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Abstract:
- The command "neighbor PEER maximum-prefix-out NUMBER" cannot be applied
without clearing the BGP neighbor.
- Apply the maximum-prefix-out value as soon as it is modified without
clearing the neighbor.
subgroup_update_packet() and subgroup_withdraw_packet() respectively
manages the announcement and withdrawal BGP message to the peer.
subgrp->scount counter counts the number of sent prefixes.
Before the patch, the maximum out prefix limitation was applied in
subgroup_update_packet() in order that subgrp->scount never exceeds the
limit. Setting a limit inferior to the effective number of sent prefix
did not result in sending any withdrawal message to reduce the number of
sent prefixes. Without clearing the BGP neighbor, the limitation only
applied to the announcement of new prefixes when the limitation was
over.
With the patch, the limitation is checked in subgroup_announce_check().
The function is intended to say whether a prefix has to be announced in
regards to the prefix-list, route-map... Now when a maximum-prefix-out
value is changed/removed, the neighbor AFI/SAFI table is re-parsed in
the same way as for the application of route-map, prefix-lists...
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Take into account the maximum-prefix-out value when calculating the
update-group hash.
Fixes: fde246e835 ("bgpd: Add an option to limit outgoing prefixes")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Add a thread_ignore_late_timer(struct thread *thread) function
that allows thread.c to ignore when timers are late to the party.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
If a thread timer should have popped CPU_CONSUMED_CHECK
seconds in the past, and we are only handling it now. Consider
the thread starved and notice it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Problem Statement:
==================
(rcv1)-----A----B---C
v3 enabled with src 90.0.0.1
|
(rcv2)--
v2 enable with src none
rcv1 sends the packet in INCLUDE mode, rcv2 sends the IGMPv2 report
and PIM convers this report into exclude mode.
As per the state machine the group structure was
getting added and deleted. As group gets deleted the mroute for 90.0.0.1
and recreated back.
This effects the end to end trafiic.
Root Cause Analysis:
====================
As per state machine
INCLUDE (A) IS_EX (B) EXCLUDE (A*B,B-A) (B-A)=0
Delete (A-B)
Group Timer=GMI
EXCLUDE (X,Y) TO_EX (A) EXCLUDE (A-Y,Y*A) (A-X-Y)=Group Timer
Delete (X-A)
Delete (Y-A)
Send Q(G,A-Y)
Group Timer=GMI
The above equations were getiing calulated for IP address
90.0.0.1 and 0.0.0.0
This results in group creation deletion.
Fix:
====
As per RFC 4604.
drop the exclude mode, IGMP reports, if destnation group is
SSM based.
EXCLUDE
mode does not apply to SSM addresses, and an SSM-aware router will
ignore MODE_IS_EXCLUDE and CHANGE_TO_EXCLUDE_MODE requests in the SSM
range,
Signed-off-by: Abhishek N R <abnr@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Dhingra <rac.vishaldhingra@gmail.com>
Problem Statement:
==================
(rcv1)-----A----B---C
v3 enabled with src 90.0.0.1
|
(rcv2)--
v3 enable with src none
rcv1 sends the packet in INCLUDE mode, rcv2 sends the IGMP report
in exclude mode. As per the state machine the group structure was
getting added and deleted. As group gets deleted the mroute for 90.0.0.1
and recreated back.
This effects the end to end trafiic.
Root Cause Analysis:
====================
As per state machine
INCLUDE (A) IS_EX (B) EXCLUDE (A*B,B-A) (B-A)=0
Delete (A-B)
Group Timer=GMI
EXCLUDE (X,Y) TO_EX (A) EXCLUDE (A-Y,Y*A) (A-X-Y)=Group Timer
Delete (X-A)
Delete (Y-A)
Send Q(G,A-Y)
Group Timer=GMI
The above equations were getiing calulated for IP address
90.0.0.1 and 0.0.0.0
This results in group creation deletion.
Fix:
====
As per RFC 4604.
drop the exclude mode, IGMP reports, if destnation group is
SSM based.
EXCLUDE
mode does not apply to SSM addresses, and an SSM-aware router will
ignore MODE_IS_EXCLUDE and CHANGE_TO_EXCLUDE_MODE requests in the SSM
range.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek N R <abnr@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Dhingra <rac.vishaldhingra@gmail.com>
Fixes#9720. When updating an ECMP inter-area route, we compute
a new route and check whether that already exists. If so, we keep the old
route and only update its nexthops. Previously, we merged the new route's
nexthops into the old one's, but this way, it's impossible to remove
nexthops from the old route, resulting in stale nexthops.
This commit fixes this by first removing all nexthops from the old route and
then copying all nexthops from the new route into it. If the new route has
fewer nexthops, the old one will have as well afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Martin Buck <mb-tmp-tvguho.pbz@gromit.dyndns.org>
BGP EVPN custom `union gw_addr` is basically the same thing as a common
`struct ipaddr` but it lacks the address family which is needed in some
cases.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
This code is populating a temporary variable `add` instead of the attr.
Initially this variable was later copied to the attr but the copying was
erroneously deleted by 0a50c2481. Directly populate the attr to restore
the correct behavior.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Here we try to compare the new attr with the existing one but this call
compares the existing index with zero instead. attrhash_cmp already
compares indexes using overlay_index_same so this call is both wrong and
useless.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
```
exit1-debian-11# sh ip bgp 10.10.10.10/32
BGP routing table entry for 10.10.10.10/32, version 14
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
Not advertised to any peer
65000, (stale)
192.168.0.2 from 192.168.0.2 (0.0.0.0)
Origin incomplete, metric 0, valid, external, best (First path received)
Last update: Wed Jan 19 17:13:51 2022
Time until Graceful Restart stale route deleted: 117
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
lib/zclient.h was missing from #includes so compiler
was rightly complaining about undefined structure.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Pass in the route_node that is under consideration
into route_notify_internal to allow calling functions
to reduce stack size as well as looking up data.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The dest_pfx was pretty much only ever used for
debug output and FRR already knows the rn. So
use that instead.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
the dest_p and src_p values were only ever used for
debugs and %pFX, when we already have the rn.
There is no need to do this lookup
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
FRR must give variable names instead of not defining
them in the .h file. This just cleans up this
problem for redistribute.h
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The function zsend_redistribute_route uses the prefix and
source prefix. Just pass in the route_node instead.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
FRR is passing around a bunch of data that is encapsulated
within the route node. Let's just pass that around instead.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
FRR is passing around a bunch of data that is encapsulated
within the route node. Let's just pass that around instead.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Redistribution for ospf with instance id's using instance id's
was incorrect. Add some small tests to make sure it catches the
issues and we don't regress.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
If you have this setup:
router ospf 3
redistribute sharp
!
and then install:
sharp install route 4.5.6.7 nexthop 192.168.100.1 1
sharp install route 4.5.6.8 nexthop 192.168.100.1 1 instance 3
sharp install route 4.5.6.9 nexthop 192.168.100.1 1 instance 4
The .8 and .9 routes are auto redistributed into ospf instance 3:
eva# show ip ospf data
OSPF Instance: 3
OSPF Router with ID (192.168.122.1)
AS External Link States
Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# CkSum Route
4.5.6.7 192.168.122.1 13 0x80000001 0x477c E2 4.5.6.7/32 [0x0]
4.5.6.8 192.168.122.1 5 0x80000001 0x3d85 E2 4.5.6.8/32 [0x0]
4.5.6.9 192.168.122.1 5 0x80000001 0x338e E2 4.5.6.9/32 [0x0]
This cannot be correct behavior. When redistributing in the absense
of an instance number the default instance of 0 should be used and should
be the only route redistributed. Here is the correct behavior:
eva# show ip route
Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP,
O - OSPF, I - IS-IS, B - BGP, E - EIGRP, N - NHRP,
T - Table, v - VNC, V - VNC-Direct, A - Babel, D - SHARP,
F - PBR, f - OpenFabric,
> - selected route, * - FIB route, q - queued, r - rejected, b - backup
t - trapped, o - offload failure
K>* 0.0.0.0/0 [0/100] via 192.168.119.1, enp39s0, 00:00:28
D>* 4.5.6.7/32 [150/0] via 192.168.100.1, virbr1, weight 1, 00:00:02
D[3]>* 4.5.6.8/32 [150/0] via 192.168.100.1, virbr1, weight 1, 00:00:02
D[4]>* 4.5.6.9/32 [150/0] via 192.168.100.1, virbr1, weight 1, 00:00:02
C>* 192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, virbr1, 00:00:28
C>* 192.168.110.0/24 is directly connected, virbr2, 00:00:28
C>* 192.168.119.0/24 is directly connected, enp39s0, 00:00:28
C>* 192.168.122.0/24 is directly connected, virbr0, 00:00:28
eva# show ip ospf data
OSPF Instance: 3
OSPF Router with ID (192.168.122.1)
AS External Link States
Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# CkSum Route
4.5.6.7 192.168.122.1 6 0x80000001 0x477c E2 4.5.6.7/32 [0x0]
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The ospf instance code is not properly handling the default route
when using default-information originate. This is because
the code is looking for the default route to be saved with an
instance of <ospf instance id> but we always save it as a instance
id of 0. In fact OSPF asks zebra for the default route as a special
case in instance 0, always.
Here is the correct behavior:
eva# show ip ospf data
OSPF Instance: 3
OSPF Router with ID (192.168.122.1)
AS External Link States
Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# CkSum Route
0.0.0.0 192.168.122.1 8 0x80000001 0xdb08 E2 0.0.0.0/0 [0x0]
eva# show ip route
Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP,
O - OSPF, I - IS-IS, B - BGP, E - EIGRP, N - NHRP,
T - Table, v - VNC, V - VNC-Direct, A - Babel, D - SHARP,
F - PBR, f - OpenFabric,
> - selected route, * - FIB route, q - queued, r - rejected, b - backup
t - trapped, o - offload failure
K>* 0.0.0.0/0 [0/100] via 192.168.119.1, enp39s0, 00:02:03
Fixes: #10251
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
