"on-shutdown" and "on-startup" have the different timeout range.
Correct the timeout range for "on-shutdown" based on the current code:
```
(ospf) max-metric router-lsa on-shutdown (5-100)
```
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
This commit changes `seg6local_context2str()` to use `%pI6`/`%pI4`
instead of `inet_ntop` to print the SRv6 seg6local context information.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
This commit changes some debug prints to use `%pI6` instead of
`inet_ntop` to print SRv6 SIDs.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()` is a wrapper around the `XFREE()` macro.
Passing a NULL pointer to `XFREE()` is safe. Therefore, checking that
the pointer passed to the `srv6_locator_chunk_free()` is not null is
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()` takes care of freeing the memory allocated
for a `struct srv6_locator_chunk` and setting the
`struct srv6_locator_chunk` pointer to NULL.
It is not necessary to explicitly set the pointer to NULL after invoking
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()`.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
A programmer can use the `srv6_locator_chunk_free()` function to free
the memory allocated for a `struct srv6_locator_chunk`.
The programmer invokes `srv6_locator_chunk_free()` by passing a single
pointer to the `struct srv6_locator_chunk` to be freed.
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()` uses `XFREE()` to free the memory.
It is the responsibility of the programmer to set the
`struct srv6_locator_chunk` pointer to NULL after freeing memory with
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()`.
This commit modifies the `srv6_locator_chunk_free()` function to take a
double pointer instead of a single pointer. In this way, setting the
`struct srv6_locator_chunk` pointer to NULL is no longer the
programmer's responsibility but is the responsibility of
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()`. This prevents programmers from making
mistakes such as forgetting to set the pointer to NULL after invoking
`srv6_locator_chunk_free()`.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
In this commit, we extend the ZAPI to support encoding and decoding the
locator flags contained in the messages exchanged between zebra and the
routing daemons.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
In this commit, we add support for a new flag called
`SRV6_LOCATOR_USID`. When the `SRV6_LOCATOR_USID` flag is set, the
routing protocols will install SRv6 behaviors with the uSID in the
dataplane.
This flag is used to specify a locator as a uSID locator. When a locator
is specified as a uSID locator, all the SRv6 SIDs allocated from the
locator by the routing protocols (like BGP) are bound to the SRv6 uSID
behaviors and use the SRv6 uSID codepoints in the BGP update message.
We extend the SRv6 locator implementation to add support for a `usid`
flag. When the `usid` flag is set, the bgpd will install SRv6 behaviors
with the uSID in the dataplane and use the proper SRv6 Endpoint Behavior
codepoint in the BGP advertisement.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
In this commit, we introduce the ability to specify flags for an SRv6
locator. Flags can be used to specify the properties of the locator.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
The python/ directory hasn't been shoved into black yet (unlike
topotests, where most FRR python code is.) Run black over it.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
If PIM had received a register packet with the Border Router
bit set, pimd would have crashed. Since I wrote this code
in 2015 and really have pretty much no memory of this and
no-one has ever reported this crash, let's just remove this
code.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When enabling the interface link-params, a default bandwidth is assigned
to the Max, Reservable and Unreserved Bandwidth variables. If the
bandwidth is set at in the interface context, this value is used.
Otherwise, a default bandwidth value of 10 Gbps is set.
Revert the default value to 10 Mbps as it was intended in the initial
commit. 10 Mbps is a low value so that the link will not be prioritized
when computing the paths.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
When waiting on a path to reach the peer, modify the debug/show
output to give a better understanding to the operator about what
they should be looking for.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
In pim_ecmp_nexthop_search: All paths that lead to this null pointer comparison already dereference the pointer earlier
There may be a null pointer dereference, or else the comparison against null is unnecessary.
Coverity CID-1519749
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
In tib_sg_oil_setup: Value returned from a function is not checked for errors before being used.
If the function returns an error value, the error value may be mistaken for a normal value.
Here, only the nexthop value is being used. So casted the return type to void.
Coverity CID-1519816
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
The code was working but the coverity scan reported a failure.
Clarify the code to make the coverity scan happy.
Fixes: fe0a129687 ("lib,zebra: link-params are not flushed after no enable")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Given that the following topology, route server MUST not modify NEXT_HOP
attribute because route server isn't in the actual routing path. This
behavior is required to comply RFC7947
(Router A) <-(eBGP peer)-> (Route Server) <-(eBGP peer)-> (Router B)
RFC7947 says as follows:
> As the route server does not participate in the actual routing of
> traffic, the NEXT_HOP attribute MUST be passed unmodified to the route
> server clients, similar to the "third-party" next-hop
> feature described in Section 5.1.3. of [RFC4271].
However, current FRR is violating RFC7947 in some cases. If routers and
route server established BGP peer over IPv6 connection and routers
advertise ipv4-vpn routes through route server, route server will modify
NEXT_HOP attribute in these advertisements.
This is because the condition to check whether NEXT_HOP attribute should
be changed or not is wrong. We should use (afi, safi) as the key to
check, but (nhafi, safi) is actually used. This causes the RFC7947
violation.
Signed-off-by: Ryoga Saito <ryoga.saito@linecorp.com>
When deciding whether to apply "neighbor soo" filtering towards a peer,
we were only looking for SoO ecoms that use either AS or AS4 encoding.
This makes sure we also check for IPv4 encoding, since we allow a user
to configure that encoding style against the peer.
Config:
```
router bgp 1
address-family ipv4 unicast
network 100.64.0.2/32 route-map soo-foo
neighbor 192.168.122.12 soo 3.3.3.3:20
exit-address-family
!
route-map soo-foo permit 10
set extcommunity soo 3.3.3.3:20
exit
```
Before:
```
ub20# show ip bgp neighbors 192.168.122.12 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 5, local router ID is 100.64.0.222, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 2.2.2.2/32 0.0.0.0 0 100 32768 i
*> 100.64.0.2/32 0.0.0.0 0 100 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 2
```
After:
```
ub20# show ip bgp neighbors 192.168.122.12 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 5, local router ID is 100.64.0.222, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 2.2.2.2/32 0.0.0.0 0 100 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 1
```
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
