Apply the TE_EXT_MASK mask to display a 24 bits instead of a wrong 32
bits value that includes unrelated bits.
Fixes: 1b3f47d04c ("isisd: Update TLVs processing for TE, RI & SR")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
RFC7471 and RFC8570 have defined the Extended Traffic Engineering
metrics that are carried within TLV of 32 bits data length. Extended
metrics, excepting bandwidth ones, use the following format:
> 0 1 2 3
> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> | Type | Length |
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> |A| RESERVED | Value |
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Data contains a flag/reserved of 8 bits and a 24 bits value.
The TE_EXT_MASK mask macro extracts a 28 bits value from a 32 bits
variable instead of 24 bits. It works in most of the case because
RESERVED bits are generally set to 0.
Fix the TE_EXT_MASK mask.
Fixes: 16f1b9ee29 ("Update Traffic Engineering Support for OSPFD")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Before this patch, we always passed `struct attr` for NLRI_UPDATE, but if we
have a situation with treat-as-withdraw (for example: malformed attribute, or
using a command like `neighbor path-attribute treat-as-withdraw`) the route
MUST be withdrawn form the BGP table.
Hence, we MUST pass attr as NULL, in this case we already have this check
under NLRI_ATTR_ARG() macro, just reuse it properly.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Before this patch, we always passed `struct attr` for NLRI_UPDATE, but if we
have a situation with treat-as-withdraw (for example: malformed attribute, or
using a command like `neighbor path-attribute treat-as-withdraw`) the route
MUST be withdrawn form the BGP table.
Hence, we MUST pass attr as NULL, in this case we already have this check
under NLRI_ATTR_ARG() macro, just reuse it properly.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
The -Wswitch-enum will allow the compiler to warn us
when a developer creates a switch over a enum and is
using `default:` when they should be iterating over
every enum
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The function ecommunity_str2com_internal appears to want to handle
the ecommunity_token_rt6 enum but skips over it. Commit
9a659715df tried to add this but I really
don't see how this is going to behave correctly. Add the
ecommunity_token_rt6 case to the switch statement so it is handled
appropriately?
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The function ecommunity_str2com_internal appears to want to handle
the ecommunity_token_rt6 enum but skips over it. Commit
9a659715df tried to add this but I really
don't see how this is going to behave correctly. Add the
ecommunity_token_rt6 case to the switch statement so it is handled
appropriately?
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The test was sometimes failing around the sleep(4) for
waiting for the routes to be installed. Instead of blindly
sleeping let's check to see that the routes are actually
there in zebra and then continue on.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
