A variety of buffer overflow reads and crashes
that could occur if you fed bad info into pim.
1) When type is setup incorrectly we were printing the first 8 bytes
of the pim_parse_addr_source, but the min encoding length is
4 bytes. As such we will read beyond end of buffer.
2) The RP(pim, grp) macro can return a NULL value
Do not automatically assume that we can deref
the data.
3) BSM parsing was not properly sanitizing data input from wire
and we could enter into situations where we would read beyond
the end of the buffer. Prevent this from happening, we are
probably left in a bad way.
4) The received bit length cannot be greater than 32 bits,
refuse to allow it to happen.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
If a register packet is received that is less than the PIM_MSG_REGISTER_LEN
in size we can have a possible situation where the data being
checksummed is just random data from the buffer we read into.
2019/11/18 21:45:46 warnings: PIM: int pim_if_add_vif(struct interface *, _Bool, _Bool): could not get address for interface fuzziface ifindex=0
==27636== Invalid read of size 4
==27636== at 0x4E6EB0D: in_cksum (checksum.c:28)
==27636== by 0x4463CC: pim_pim_packet (pim_pim.c:194)
==27636== by 0x40E2B4: main (pim_main.c:117)
==27636== Address 0x771f818 is 0 bytes after a block of size 24 alloc'd
==27636== at 0x4C2FB0F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==27636== by 0x40E261: main (pim_main.c:112)
==27636==
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When you configure interface configuration without explicitly
configuring pim on that interface, we were not creating the pimreg
interface and as such we would crash in an attempted register
since the pimreg device is non-existent.
The crash is this:
==8823== Invalid read of size 8
==8823== at 0x468614: pim_channel_add_oif (pim_oil.c:392)
==8823== by 0x46D0F1: pim_register_join (pim_register.c:61)
==8823== by 0x449AB3: pim_mroute_msg_nocache (pim_mroute.c:242)
==8823== by 0x449AB3: pim_mroute_msg (pim_mroute.c:661)
==8823== by 0x449AB3: mroute_read (pim_mroute.c:707)
==8823== by 0x4FC0676: thread_call (thread.c:1549)
==8823== by 0x4EF3A2F: frr_run (libfrr.c:1064)
==8823== by 0x40DCB5: main (pim_main.c:162)
==8823== Address 0xc8 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
pim_register_join calls pim_channel_add_oif with:
pim_channel_add_oif(up->channel_oil, pim->regiface,
PIM_OIF_FLAG_PROTO_PIM);
We just need to make srue pim->regiface exists once we start configuring
pim.
Fixes: #5358
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When configuring a RP, dissallow the choice of 0.0.0.0 or
255.255.255.255 as the address as that they make no sense
what so ever.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
We were adding a newline for the source in some cases
but not others and tighten up the display of data
eva# show ip pim rp-info
RP address group/prefix-list OIF I am RP Source
10.254.0.1 224.0.0.0/4 lo yes Static
4.4.4.4 225.1.2.3/32 abcdefghijklmno yes Static
10.0.20.45 226.200.100.100/32 r1-eth0 no Static
eva#
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
1. add the Mlag ProtoBuf Lib to Zebra Compilation
2. Encode the messages with protobuf before writing to MLAG
3. Decode the MLAG Messages using protobuf and write to clients
based on their subscrption.
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Kumar K <sathk@cumulusnetworks.com>
This includes:
1. Defining message formats
2. Stream Decoding after receiving the message at PIM
3. Handling MLAG UP & Down Notifications
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Kumar K <sathk@cumulusnetworks.com>
when ever a FRR Client wants to send any data to another node
using MLAG Channel, uses below mechanisam.
1. sends a MLAG Registration to zebra with interested messages that
it is intended to receive from peer.
2. In response to this request, Zebra opens communication channel with
MLAG. and also in Rx. diretion zebra forwards only those messages which
client shown interest during registration
3. when client is no-longer interested in communicating with MLAG, client
posts De-register to Zebra
4. if this is the last client which is interested for MLAG Communication,
zebra closes the channel.
why PIM Needs MLAG Communication
================================
1. In general on LAN Networks elecetd DR will send the Join towards
Multicast RP in case of a LHR and Register in case of FHR.
2. But in case DR Goes down, traffic will be re-converged only after
the New DR is elected, but this can take time based on Hold Timer to
detect the DR down.
3. this can be optimised by using MLAG Mecganisam.
4. and also Traffic can be forwarded more efficiently by knowing the cost
towards RP using MLAG
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Kumar K <sathk@cumulusnetworks.com>
When receiving igmp packets we are spitting out a lot of
debugs. Attempt to clean this up to allow us to understand
what is going on a bit better by just being able to look
at the log file.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When you turn on `debug igmp trace` we are seeing a bunch
of debugs associated with pim processing. This is because we were
using PIM_DEBUG_TRACE which is both `debug igmp trace` and `debug pim trace`
when tracing igmp code it would be nice to only see igmp work.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
We are seeing situations where PIM is sending a IGMP v3 query
and immediately receiving back up the pim kernel interface the
query from itself:
from `show int brief`:
swp7 up default 192.168.202.1/24
We are also receiving these debugs:
2019-11-11T20:52:40.452307+00:00 leaf02 pimd[1592]: Send IGMPv3 query to 224.4.0.8 on swp7 for group 224.4.0.8, sources=0 msg_size=12 s_flag=0 QRV=2 QQI=125 QQIC=7d
2019-11-11T20:52:40.452430+00:00 leaf02 pimd[1592]: pim_mroute_msg(default): igmp kernel upcall on swp7(0x55eaa7dc7dc0) for 192.168.202.1 -> 224.4.11.123
2019-11-11T20:52:40.452574+00:00 leaf02 pimd[1592]: Recv IP packet from 192.168.202.1 to 224.4.11.123 on swp7: size=40 ip_header_size=24 ip_proto=2
2019-11-11T20:52:40.452699+00:00 leaf02 pimd[1592]: Recv IGMP packet from 192.168.202.1 to 224.4.11.123 on swp7: ttl=1 msg_type=17 msg_size=16
2019-11-11T20:52:40.452824+00:00 leaf02 pimd[1592]: Recv IGMP query v3 from 192.168.202.1 on swp7 for group 224.4.11.123
This query is causing us to do some weird gyrations around the IGMP state machine for handling
queries. Let's just prevent it from happening.
Ticket: CM-27247
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When adding an OIF to the OIL, if we are not the DR
there is no need to install it then remove it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
We have a zlog_warn that is unguarded ( and really is a debug message )
as that there is nothing the end user can do and nothing to note
here other than a debug message to track refcounts. Change
to an appropriate debug and zlog_debug it instead.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When you enter:
ip pim ssm prefix-list my-custom-ssm-range
ip pim ssm prefix-list my-custom-ssm-range
The second instance would cause a failure to happen which
should not happen w/ duplicate config.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Scenarios where this code change is required:
1. BFD is un-configured from BGP at remote end.
Neighbour BFD sends ADMIN_DOWN state, but BFD on local side will send
DOWN to BGP, resulting in BGP session DOWN.
Removing BFD session administratively shouldn't bring DOWN BGP session
at local or remote.
2. BFD is un-configured from BGP or shutdown locally.
BFD will send state DOWN to BGP resulting in BGP session DOWN.
(This is akin to saying do not use BFD for BGP)
Removing BFD session administratively shouldn't bring DOWN BGP session at
local or remote.
Signed-off-by: Sayed Mohd Saquib sayed.saquib@broadcom.com
The result variable was already tested against PIM_GROUP_BAD_ADDR_MASK_COMBO
earlier in the function. No need to do the same thing twice.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
All paths leading to this point in the code have already deref'ed
the pim->global_scope.bsrp_table. No point in testing for
validness now. This was caught by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The pim_msg_send() return code was not being checked. Make
consistent with it's usage everywhere else.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cleanup the interface creation apis to make it more
clear what they are doing.
Make it explicit that the creation via name/ifindex will
only add it to the appropriate list.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@cumulusnetworks.com>
There are several places in the pim where we are mixing up
zlog_warn w/ zlog_debug and vice versa. If we are protecting
a zlog_warn w/ a debug is it really a warn? If we have an actual
error situation we should also warn about it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When we create the up data structure we create the channel_oil
as well. As such it is impossible to get into this code
so it can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
This will facilitate the Hardware to prefer control packets over
Normal Data packets while queuing, so that during congestion, the
chance of dropping control packet will be minimised.
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Kumar K <sathk@cumulusnetworks.com>
For all the places we have a zclient->interface_up convert
them to use the interface ifp_up callback instead.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Switch the zclient->interface_add functionality to have everyone
use the interface create callback in lib/if.c
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Start the conversion to allow zapi interface callbacks to be
controlled like vrf creation/destruction/change callbacks.
This will allow us to consolidate control into the interface.c
instead of having each daemon read the stream and react accordingly.
This will hopefully reduce a bunch of cut-n-paste stuff
Create 4 new callback functions that will be controlled by
lib/if.c
create -> A upper level protocol receives an interface creation event
The ifp is brand spanking newly created in the system.
up -> A upper level protocol receives a interface up event
This means the interface is up and ready to go.
down -> A upper level protocol receives a interface down
destroy -> A upper level protocol receives a destroy event
This means to delete the pointers associated with it.
At this point this is just boilerplate setup for future commits.
There is no new functionality.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The Pim RFC does not appear to state any length requirements
of pim, other than the checksum must be correct.
Certain vendors are sending extra data at the end of a pim assert
message. This while not explicitly against the rules was a bit
of surprise to pim when we threw the assert message on the floor
for being too long.
Modify the test to see if length left will allow us to read
the 8 bytes of data that we need. If it is sufficient for
that allow the packet to be used.
Fixes: #4957
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Original Idea is to display normal & detailed debugs when detailed
debug alone is configured. because of this "sh debugs" are showing
wrong Information, because same macro is used to disply the configured
debugs.
that means even if Normal debug is configured, detailed macro returns
TRUE. To avoid this ambiguity check whetehr detailed debug is configured
or not during dumping configured debugs. In all other places using
old macro.
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Kumar K <sathk@cumulusnetworks.com>
Debian packaging when run finds a bunch of spelling errors:
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/vtysh occurences occurrences
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/frr/bfdd Amount of times Number of times
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/frr/bgpd occurences occurrences
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/frr/bgpd recieved received
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/frr/isisd betweeen between
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/frr/ospf6d Infomation Information
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/frr/ospfd missmatch mismatch
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/frr/pimd bootsrap bootstrap
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/frr/pimd Unknwon Unknown
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/frr/zebra Requsted Requested
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/frr/zebra uknown unknown
I: frr: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/frr/libfrr.so.0.0.0 overriden overridden
This commit fixes all of them except the bgp `recieved` issue due to
it being part of json output. That one will need to go through
a deprecation cycle.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Pim will do the nexthop registration with "ip pim rp" static configuration
with this Zebra will advertise the Route Information.
But while processing this info at PIM, if Nexthop Interfaces are not PIM
enabled, currently PIM is dropping those paths. in case all paths are not
PIM enabled, there is no valid RPF Interface at PIM.
and PIM will be stuck at this state until Next update this to route, that
can happen only if there is a Routing change at Zebra for this prefix.
until that time PIM will not have any valid outgoing Interface.
This issue was mainly seen during Node bootup scenarios.
Fix Proposed
=============
store the paths in PIM PNC Data structure though they are not enabled
with PIM, because while selecting the Interface PIM checks for multicast
enabled Interface.
Tests Performed
===============
1. Verified fail Test case
2. Disabling the PIM on selected outgoing Interface, PIM is choosing
another path when Neighbor is down on this Interface.
3. Re-configure the PIM on above un-configured Interface, PIM is staying
with old NHop since it is valid.
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Kumar K <sathk@cumulusnetworks.com>
Modify the code to create an upstream reference whenever the code
creates an channel_oil via the pim_mroute.c code. This code also
starts a keep alive timer to clean up the reference if we do
nothing with it after the normal time.
I've left alone the source->channel_oil creation because these
are kept and tracked independently already.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
