The test is done on r2. A BGP update is received on r2, and is
filtered on r2. The RIB of r2 does not have the BGP update stored,
but the ADJ-RIB-IN is yet present. To demonstrate this, if the
inbound route-map is removed, then the BGP update should be copied
from the the ADJ-RIB-IN and added to the RIB with the label
value.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
This test ensures that when r1 changes the label value, then
the new value is automatically propagated to remote peer.
This demonstrates that the ADJ-RIB-OUT to r2 has been correctly
updated.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Small rework to fix the following checkpatch warning:
> < WARNING: Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring
> < #2142: FILE: /tmp/f1-1616988/vnc_import_bgp.c:2142:
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
In route_vty_out_detail(), tag_buf stores a string representation of
the VNI label.
Rename tag_buf to vni_buf for clarity and rework the code a little bit
to prepare the following commits.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
num_labels cannot be greater than BGP_MAX_LABELS by design.
Remove the check and the override.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Add bgp_path_info_labels_same() to compare labels with labels from
path_info. Remove labels_same() that was used for mplsvpn only.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
In bgp_update(), path_info *new has just been created and has void
labels. bgp_labels_same() is always false.
Do not compare previous labels before setting them.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
No need to init labels at extra allocation. num_labels is the number
of set labels in label[] and is initialized to 0 by default.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
The handling of MPLS labels in BGP faces an issue due to the way labels
are stored in memory. They are stored in bgp_path_info but not in
bgp_adj_in and bgp_adj_out structures. As a consequence, some
configuration changes result in losing labels or even a bgpd crash. For
example, when retrieving routes from the Adj-RIB-in table
("soft-reconfiguration inbound" enabled), labels are missing.
bgp_path_info stores the MPLS labels, as shown below:
> struct bgp_path_info {
> struct bgp_path_info_extra *extra;
> [...]
> struct bgp_path_info_extra {
> mpls_label_t label[BGP_MAX_LABELS];
> uint32_t num_labels;
> [...]
To solve those issues, a solution would be to set label data to the
bgp_adj_in and bgp_adj_out structures in addition to the
bgp_path_info_extra structure. The idea is to reference a common label
pointer in all these three structures. And to store the data in a hash
list in order to save memory.
However, an issue in the code prevents us from setting clean data
without a rework. The extra->num_labels field, which is intended to
indicate the number of labels in extra->label[], is not reliably checked
or set. The code often incorrectly assumes that if the extra pointer is
present, then a label must also be present, leading to direct access to
extra->label[] without verifying extra->num_labels. This assumption
usually works because extra->label[0] is set to MPLS_INVALID_LABEL when
a new bgp_path_info_extra is created, but it is technically incorrect.
Cleanup the label code by setting num_labels each time values are set in
extra->label[] and checking extra->num_labels before accessing the
labels.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Configuration:
```
vtysh <<EOF
configure
vrf vrf100
vni 10100
exit-vrf
router bgp 50
address-family l2vpn evpn
advertise-all-vni
exit-address-family
exit
router bgp 100 vrf vrf100
exit
EOF
```
TL;DR; When we configure `advertise-all-vni` (in this case), a new BGP instance
is created with the name vrf100, and ASN 50. Next, when we create
`router bgp 100 vrf vrf100`, we look for the BGP instance with the same name
and we found it, but ASNs are different 50 vs. 100.
Every such a new auto created instance is flagged with BGP_VRF_AUTO.
After the fix:
```
router bgp 50
!
address-family l2vpn evpn
advertise-all-vni
exit-address-family
exit
!
router bgp 100 vrf vrf100
exit
!
end
donatas.net(config)# router bgp 51
BGP is already running; AS is 50
donatas.net(config)# router bgp 50
donatas.net(config-router)# router bgp 101 vrf vrf100
BGP is already running; AS is 100
donatas.net(config)# router bgp 100 vrf vrf100
donatas.net(config-router)#
```
Fixes: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/16152
Fixes: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/9537
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Fixes:
zebra/zebra_netns_notify.c: In function 'zebra_ns_ready_read':
zebra/zebra_netns_notify.c:266:40: error: implicit declaration of function 'basename' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
266 | if (strmatch(VRF_DEFAULT_NAME, basename(netnspath))) {
| ^~~~~~~~
Fixed by including libgen.h, then since basename may modify its
parameter, allocate a copy on the stack, using strdupa, and pass the
temporary string to basename.
According to the man page for basename:
With glibc, one gets the POSIX version of basename() when
<libgen.h> is included, and the GNU version otherwise.
The POSIX version of basename may modify the contents of path,
so we should to pass a copy when calling this function.
[1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/basename.3.html
Signed-off-by: Georgi Valkov <gvalkov@gmail.com>
I had problem by running container after build.
It gave the error below in container,
[FATAL tini (7)] exec /usr/lib/frr/docker-start failed: Permission denied
So I have fixed the permission issues after building images.
Signed-off-by: Çağatay Erem <cagatayerem@gmail.com>
The 'show running-config' does not display the ipv6 source address
when a locator is not configured. Fix this by systematically displaying
the ipv6 source address.
Fixes: 6a0956169b ("zebra: Add encap source address to SRv6 config write function")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
This change will stop this action from running on forked repos.
Previously whenever one pushed a change to one's development branch the
action would "run but skip" which still generated an email notifications
and thus was very annoying. :)
Signed-off-by: Christian Hopps <chopps@labn.net>
The default DSCP used for BGP connections is CS6. The DSCP value is
not part of the TCP header.
When setting the IP_TOS or IPV6_TCLASS socket options, the argument
is not the 6-bit DSCP value, but an 8-bit value for the former IPv4
Type of Service field or IPv6 Traffic Class field, respectively.
Fixes: 425bd64be8 ("bgpd: Allow bgp to control the DSCP session TOS value")
Signed-off-by: David Ward <david.ward@ll.mit.edu>
When the kernel is not compiled with mroute vrf's enabled it will
fail the call to initialize the vrf. As such let's recognize this
specific error code and output a specific warning to the operator
to help them figure this problem out.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Before we checked for received Graceful Restart capability, but that was also
incorrect, because we SHOULD HAVE checked it per AFI/SAFI instead.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4724 says:
Although the End-of-RIB marker is specified for the purpose of BGP
graceful restart, it is noted that the generation of such a marker
upon completion of the initial update would be useful for routing
convergence in general, and thus the practice is recommended.
Thus, it might be reasonable to send EoR regardless of whether the Graceful Restart
capability is received or not from the peer.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
lib/typesafe.h was supposed to be outside the _TYPESAFE_EXPAND_MACROS
guard, so that including lib/atomlist.h grabs all the typesafe container
macros.
(No effect on normal build, as _TYPESAFE_EXPAND_MACROS is never defined
there.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
