Register and Null register send handling
In IPv6 PIM Null Register message if dummy PIM Header is included as
data, this dummy PIM header checksum needs to be valuated
Signed-off-by: plsaranya <Saranya_Panjarathina@dell.com>
Within one Address List Hello option, all the addresses MUST be of
the same address family. It is not permitted to mix IPv4 and IPv6
addresses within the same message. In addition, the address family
of the fields in the message SHOULD be the same as the IP source and
destination addresses of the packet header.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
There's a common pattern of "get VRF context for CLI node" here, which
first got a helper macro in zebra that then permeated into pimd.
Unfortunately the pimd copy wasn't quite adjusted correctly and thus
caused two coverity warnings (CID 1517453, CID 1517454).
Fix the PIM one, and clean up by providing a common base macro in
`lib/vty.h`.
Also rename the macros (add `_VRF`) to make more clear what they do.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
The ICMP6_FILTER option is always checked by the kernel, so the cost is
taken whether or not anything is set there. Use it instead of taking on
additional cost with a BPF program.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
1. Adding a field family in the existing ZEBRA_IPMR_ROUTE_STATS
to get the ipv4 as well as ipv6 trafic stats between pim and zebra.
2. Modify the debug to print both v4/v6 prefixes
pimd: pim6d: Modify pim_zlookup_sg_statistics to get ipv6 stats
Modify the pim_zlookup_sg_statistics api to
get ipv4/ipv6 stats from zebra. Making the api
common.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
By changing this API call to use a `struct ipaddr`, which encodes the
type of IP address with it. (And rename/remove the `IPV4` from the
command name.)
Also add a comment explaining that this function call is going to be
obsolete in the long run since pimd needs to move to proper MRIB NHT.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
The normal flag was enabling detail messages, but what we want is the
detail flag enabling normal messages.
Remove the _ONLY macro while at it, it's only used for config print &
that seems like a place where making the difference explicitly visible
is helpful regardless.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Modifying the "mld_group_watermark_cmd" to "ipv6_mld_group_watermark_cmd"
and "igmp_group_watermark_cmd" to "ip_igmp_group_watermark_cmd" for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
5421bf8 commit forgot to set the parameter "new" to true
when a new source is created, have fixed it.
igmp_get_source_by_addr api is currently setting the parameter
"new" to false always. This is not right. The caller apis are using
this field to decide and based on that take actions to create timers, etc.
Its need to be set to true when a new source is created.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
frr(config-if)# ip igmp join 232.1.1.1 10.10.10.10
frr(config-if)# do sh ip igmp sources
Interface Address Group Source Timer Fwd Uptime
ens192 232.1.1.1 10.10.10.10 04:10 N 00:00:10
frr(config-if)#
The above output is misaligned and is having Address field which is not
required here.
Fixing it.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
I should've removed this in #10960. It's a hazard in terms of
forgetting to adjust PRs/other changes that might accidentally still
reference the field.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Just simple helpers to get a scope value, never-forward, and is-SSM for
a given address.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Currently pim_zlookup_nexthop is of type struct prefix, but it's always
a /32 host prefix. So changing it to pim_addr in order to support both
IPV4 and IPV6.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
In this PR, we are handling the igmp_mtrace code
after mrib_nexthop_addr modified from prefix
to pim_addr.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
In this PR, we are handling the pim_rpf code
after mrib_nexthop_addr modified from prefix
to pim_addr.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Currently mrib_nexthop_addr is of type struct prefix, but it's always
a /32 host prefix. So changing it to pim_addr in order to support both
IPV4 and IPV6.
Signed-off-by: sarita patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Adding the config mode command
ipv6 mld watermark-warn <1-65535>
This command can be use to warn the user
when more than the desired limit of groups gets configured.
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
Adding the Interface level config command
ipv6 mld last-member-query-interval (1-65535)
This command can be use to tune the response time for group specific queries.
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
Adding the Interface level config command
ipv6 mld last-member-query-count (1-255)
This command can be use to tune the number of Multicast-Address- Specific Queries
sent before the router assumes there are no remaining listeners for an address on a link.
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
Adding the Interface level config command
ipv6 mld query-max-response-time <1-65535>
This command can be use to tune the max response time for general queries.
The number of seconds represented by the [Query Response Interval] must be less than the [Query Interval]
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
The entire `case NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV6_IFINDEX:` block here was a bit of a
tripwire to stumble over, since there was no indication at all that this
concerns RFC5549 nexthop handling. So it got mis-adapted for PIM IPv6
support.
Clarify this a whole bunch that this is for v4-over-v6 nexthop mangling,
and nothing else.
This should really also use neighbor's secondary address lists for the
lookup, but that is probably going to break compatibility with other
boxes that don't include v6 addrs in v4 hellos and needs further
machinery to do properly, so for now just leave a breadcrumb.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
The only function these macros have is to make the code confusing.
"PIM_IF_DO_PIM" sounds like it triggers some action, but it doesn't.
Replace with "bool" fields in struct pim_interface.
(Note: PIM_IF_*_IGMP_LISTEN_ALLROUTERS was always set, without any way
to unset it. It is completely removed now and always enabled.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Adding new show CLI to display regarding pim neighbors.
Changing DEFUN to DEFPY for "show ip pim neighbor" command.
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
Adding the new cli to display pim local membership information.
Changing DEFUN to DEPFY for "show ip pim local-membership"
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
Adding show ipv6 pim join and show ipv6 pim vrf all join
CLIs to display pim join related information and
formatted the json output for "show ip pim join" and
"show ip pim vrf all join" commands.
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
Adding show ipv6 pim interface and show ipv6 pim vrf all interface
CLIs to display pim enabled interface informations and
formatted the json output for "show ip pim interface" and
"show ip pim vrf all interface" commands.
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
Adding new CLI to display pim channel informations.
Changing DEFUN to DEPFY for ""show ip pim channel"
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
When pimd has this setup:
src ----- rtr ------ receiver
|
rp
And the receiver sends a *,G join to rtr. When the
src starts sending a S,G, rtr can wait up to one join/prune
interval before sending a S,G rpt prune. This interval
causes the pimreg device to be in the S,G OIL as that the
RP does not know to prune this leg off.
before:
Timestamp: Thu Mar 31 10:15:18 2022 288767 usec
[MROUTE](10.103.0.5,239.0.0.4) Iif: rtr-lan_src Oifs: rtr-lan State: resolved Table: default
Timestamp: Thu Mar 31 10:15:18 2022 288777 usec
[MROUTE](10.103.0.5,239.0.0.4) Iif: rtr-lan_src Oifs: rtr-lan rtr-lan-1 State: resolved Table: default
Timestamp: Thu Mar 31 10:15:18 2022 288789 usec
[MROUTE](10.103.0.5,239.0.0.4) Iif: rtr-lan_src Oifs: pimreg rtr-lan rtr-lan-1 State: resolved Table: default
Timestamp: Thu Mar 31 10:15:49 2022 324995 usec
[MROUTE](10.103.0.5,239.0.0.4) Iif: rtr-lan_src Oifs: rtr-lan rtr-lan-1 State: resolved Table: default
<31 seconds>
After:
Timestamp: Thu Mar 31 12:56:15 2022 501921 usec
(10.103.0.5,239.0.0.27) Iif: rtr-lan_src Oifs: pimreg rtr-lan State: resolved Table: default
Timestamp: Thu Mar 31 12:56:15 2022 501930 usec
(10.103.0.5,239.0.0.27) Iif: rtr-lan_src Oifs: pimreg rtr-lan rtr-lan-1 State: resolved Table: default
Timestamp: Thu Mar 31 12:56:15 2022 502181 usec
(10.103.0.5,239.0.0.27) Iif: rtr-lan_src Oifs: rtr-lan rtr-lan-1 State: resolved Table: default
<sub second>
What is actually happening:
rtr receives a *,G igmp join, sends a *,G join towards the rp
rtr receives a S,G packet <WRVIFWHOLE>
creates the S,G upstream, sends the register packet to the rp
the rp sees that it still has downstream interest so it forwards the packet on
After (up to 60 seconds ) the rtr, sends the normally scheduled join for
the G and sends the S,GRPT prune as part of it.
What is being done to fix it:
In wrvifwhole handling, when pimd detects that this is the FHR
and is not the RP *and* the incoming interface for the *,G
is different than the incomding interface for the S,G immediately
send a single join packet for the G( which will have the S,G RPT
prune in it ). Only do this on the first time receiving the
WRVIFWHOLE.
Ticket: #2755650
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Problem:
Once Assert election is over and winner is elected, the downstream router has to prune from the upstream LOSER if it has joined already and have to join with upstream elected WINNER
pim_rpf_update function takes care of changing the rpf_ch if the
existing one is PIM_IFASSERT_I_AM_LOSER
Signed-off-by: plsaranya <Saranya_Panjarathina@dell.com>
Re-evaluate the creation/deletion of groups when there is
a change in group type.
Issue: #10128
Co-authored-by: Vishal Dhingra <rac.vishaldhingra@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
Currently FRR creates an (S,G) PIM state when an IGMPv3
(S,G) join with INCLUDE mode is received for the ASM group.
Since it is an ASM group, we should not create (S,G) PIM state
and should not be sending PIM (S,G) joins towards the source.
This is a misconfiguration. So keep this group in IGMP table
and do not create PIM state.
Issue: #10128
Co-authored-by: Vishal Dhingra <rac.vishaldhingra@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>