When peering with an EVPN device from other vendor, FRR acting as route
reflector is not able to read nor transmit the label value.
Actually, EVPN AD routes completely ignore the label value in the code,
whereas in some functionalities like evpn-vpws, it is authorised to
carry and propagate label value.
Fix this by handling the label value.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Just to make it simpler for compiling with a different default value.
No change to its default value.
Signed-off-by: Enke Chen <enchen@paloaltonetworks.com>
When staticd receives a `ZAPI_SRV6_SID_RELEASED` notification from SRv6
SID Manager, it tries to unset the validity flag of `sid`. But since
the `sid` variable is NULL, we get a NULL pointer dereference.
```
=================================================================
==13815==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000060 (pc 0xc14b813d9eac bp 0xffffcb135a40 sp 0xffffcb135a40 T0)
==13815==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
==13815==Hint: address points to the zero page.
#0 0xc14b813d9eac in static_zebra_srv6_sid_notify staticd/static_zebra.c:1172
#1 0xe44e7aa2c194 in zclient_read lib/zclient.c:4746
#2 0xe44e7a9b69d8 in event_call lib/event.c:1984
#3 0xe44e7a85ac28 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1246
#4 0xc14b813ccf98 in main staticd/static_main.c:193
#5 0xe44e7a4773f8 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
#6 0xe44e7a4774c8 in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:392
#7 0xc14b813cc92c in _start (/usr/lib/frr/staticd+0x1c92c)
AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV staticd/static_zebra.c:1172 in static_zebra_srv6_sid_notify
==13815==ABORTING
```
This commit fixes the problem by doing a SID lookup first. If the SID
can't be found, we log an error and return. If the SID is found, we go
ahead and unset the validity flag.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <cscarpit@cisco.com>
Just to make it simpler for compiling with a different default value.
No change to its default value.
Signed-off-by: Enke Chen <enchen@paloaltonetworks.com>
When you have suppress-fib-pending turned on it is possible
to end up in a situation where the prefix is not withdrawn
from downstream peers.
Here is the timing that I believe is happening:
a) have 2 paths to a peer.
b) receive a withdrawal from 1 path, set BGP_NODE_FIB_INSTALL_PENDING
and send the route install to zebra.
c) receive a withdrawal from the other path.
d) At this point we have a dest->flags set BGP_NODE_FIB_INSTALL_PENDING
old_select the path_info going away, new_select is NULL
e) A bit further down we call group_announce_route() which calls
the code to see if we should advertise the path. It sees the
BGP_NODE_FIB_INSTALL_PENDING flag and says, nope.
f) the route is sent to zebra to withdraw, which unsets the
BGP_NODE_FIB_INSTALL_PENDING.
g) This function winds up and deletes the path_info. Dest now
has no path infos.
h) BGP receives the route install(from step b) and unsets the
BGP_NODE_FIB_INSTALL_PENDING flag
i) BGP receives the route removed from zebra (from step f) and
unsets the flag again.
We know if there is no new_select, let's go ahead and just
unset the PENDING flag to allow the withdrawal to go out
at the time when the second withdrawal is received.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When looping through the dplane providers, the worklist was
being populated with items from the last provider and then
the event system was checked to see if we should stop processing.
If the event system says `yes` then the dplane code would stop
and send the worklist to the master zebra pthread for collection.
This obviously skipped the next dplane provider on the list
which is double plus not good.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The mutex that wraps access to the output buffer
is being held for the entire time the data is
being generated to send down the pipe. Since
the generation has absolutely nothing to do
with the obuf, let's limit the mutex holding some.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The fpm_testing_topo1 didn't turn on the fpm_listener
sending the routes back to zebra to set the asic offload.
Modify the test to tell the fpm_listener to set the offloaded
flag and reflect the route back to the dplane_fpm_nl.c code.
Also modify zebra to expect a response to the underlying fpm listener.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
In fpm_listener, when a error is detected it would
stop listening and not recover. Modify the code
to close the socket and allow the connection to
recover.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
A recent code change 29122bc9b8
changed the passing of data up the fpm from passing the
tableid and vrf to the sonic expected tableid contains
the vrfid. This violates the assumptions in the code
that the netlink message passes up the tableid as the
tableid. Additionally this code change did not modify
the rib_find_rn_from_ctx to actually properly decode
what could be passed up. Let's just fix this and let
Sonic carry the patch as appropriate for themselves
since they are not the only users of dplane_fpm_nl.c
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When called without caps/privs, just return from "change_caps"
instead of exiting - it's possible that a process may not need
privs, but a lib (for example) may use the api.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@cisco.com>
When looping through the dplane providers, the worklist was
being populated with items from the last provider and then
the event system was checked to see if we should stop processing.
If the event system says `yes` then the dplane code would stop
and send the worklist to the master zebra pthread for collection.
This obviously skipped the next dplane provider on the list
which is double plus not good.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-16 defines that we MUST NOT
advertise an aggregate prefix to the contributing ASes.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
The SRv6 SID Manager does not allow allocating an SRv6 End/uN function
even though it is already supported by staticd.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <cscarpit@cisco.com>
If we have IPv6-only network and no IPv4 addresses at all, then by default
0.0.0.0 is created which is treated as malformed according to RFC 6286.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
We were hashing 4 bytes of the address. Even for IPv6 addresses.
Oops.
The reason this was done was to try to make it faster, but made a
complex maze out of everything. Time for a refactor.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
When reading in a nexthop from ZAPI, only set the fields that actually
have meaning. While it shouldn't happen to begin with, we can otherwise
carry padding garbage into the unused leftover union bytes.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
rmap_src wasn't initialized, so for IPv4 the unused 12 bytes would
contain whatever junk is on the stack on function entry. Also move
the IPv4 parse before the IPv6 parse so if it's successful we can be
sure the other bytes haven't been touched.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Doesn't seem to break anything but really poor style to pass potentially
uninitialized data to hash_lookup.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
While the loop is currently exited in all cases after using nexthop, it
is a footgun to have "nh" around to be reused in another iteration of
the loop. This would leave nexthop with partial data from the previous
use. Make it local where needed instead.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
In ebgp-multihop, there is a difference in reload behavior when TTL is
unspecified (meaning default 255) and when 255 is explicitly specified.
For example, when reloading with 'neighbor <neighbor> ebgp-multihop
255' in the config, the following difference is created. This commit
fixes that.
Lines To Delete
===============
router bgp 65001
no neighbor 10.0.0.4 ebgp-multihop
exit
Lines To Add
============
router bgp 65001
neighbor 10.0.0.4 ebgp-multihop 255
exit
The commit 767aaa3a80 is not sufficient and frr-reload needs to be
fixed to handle both unspecified and specified cases.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro MIKI <nob@bobuhiro11.net>
Currently FRR does not handle v6 recurisive resolution properly
when the route being recursed through changes and the most
significant bits of the route are not changed.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
