Using red-black trees instead of linked lists brings the following
benefits:
1 - Elements are naturally ordered (no need to reorder anything before
outputting data to the user);
2 - Faster lookups/deletes: O(log n) time complexity against O(n).
The insert operation with red-black trees is more expensive though,
but that's not a big issue since lookups are much more frequent.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Using red-black trees instead of linked lists brings the following
benefits:
1 - Elements are naturally ordered (no need to reorder anything before
outputting data to the user);
2 - Faster lookups/deletes: O(log n) time complexity against O(n).
The insert operation with red-black trees is more expensive though,
but that's not a big issue since lookups are much more frequent.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Using red-black trees instead of linked lists brings the following
benefits:
1 - Elements are naturally ordered (no need to reorder anything before
outputting data to the user);
2 - Faster lookups/deletes: O(log n) time complexity against O(n).
The insert operation with red-black trees is more expensive though,
but that's not a big issue since lookups are much more frequent.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Using red-black trees instead of linked lists brings the following
benefits:
1 - Elements are naturally ordered (no need to reorder anything before
outputting data to the user);
2 - Faster lookups/deletes: O(log n) time complexity against O(n).
The insert operation with red-black trees is more expensive though,
but that's not a big issue since lookups are much more frequent.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
This replaces Quagga -> FRR in most configure.ac settings as well as
a handful of preprocessor macros in the source code.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
