The current implementation of building JSON output is greatly different
for large communities compared to standard communities. This is mainly
noticeable by the missing 'list' attribute, which usually offers an
array of all communities present on a BGP route.
This commit adds the missing functionality of properly returning a
'list' attribute in JSON output and also tries a similar approach like
the standard communities are using to implement this feature.
Additionally, the 'format' specifier has been completely removed from
large communities string/JSON rendering, as the official RFC8092 specifies that
there is only one canonical representation:
> The canonical representation of BGP Large Communities is three
> separate unsigned integers in decimal notation in the following
> order: Global Administrator, Local Data 1, Local Data 2. Numbers
> MUST NOT contain leading zeros; a zero value MUST be represented with
> a single zero. Each number is separated from the next by a single
> colon. For example: 64496:4294967295:2, 64496:0:0.
As the 'format' specifier has not been used/checked and only one
canonical representation exists per today, there was no reason to keep
the 'format' parameter in the function signature.
Last but not least, the struct attribute 'community_entry.config' is no
longer being used for large communities and instead 'lcommunity_str' is
being called to maintain a similar approach to standard communities.
As a side effect, this also fixed a memory leak inside 'community_entry_free'
which did not free the allocated memory for the 'config' attribute when
dealing with a large community.
Signed-off-by: Pascal Mathis <mail@pascalmathis.com>
Imported routes in a VRF routing table have a reference to their parent
route entry which resides in the EVPN or IPVPN routing table. Ensure that
this reference uses appropriate locking so that the parent entry doesn't
get freed prematurely.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 13cb6b22ba9d558b1b4a1e8752f63f13242462a7)
Conflicts:
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c
Ticket: CM-20471
Testing Done:
a) Ran vrf_route_leak tests without fix and hit crash, ran twice with fix
and did not see the crash.
b) Ran evpn-smoke and ensured there were no new failures.
In the FRR implementation of EVPN,
eBGP leaf-spine peering for EVPN is fully supported by allowing
the next hop to be propagated and not rewritten at each hop.
There are other changes also related to route import to facilitate this.
However, propagating the next hop is not correct in some cases.
Specifically, if the DC is comprised of multiple PODs
with distinct intra-POD and inter-POD VxLAN tunnels,
EVPN routes received from an adjacent POD by a border/exit leaf
must be propagated into the local POD with the next hop rewritten (to self).
Signed-off-by: Mitesh Kanjariya <mitesh@cumulusnetworks.com>
We install type-5 routes as ipv4/ipv6 unicast routes in the vrf table.
along with these routes, we also install the RMAC
and the nexthop Neigh entries.
There might be scenarios were the bestpath has changed and
we are now pointing to a new nexthop with a different RMAC.
As per BGP logic, we just send an update for the route and the nexthop
is replaced. However, this causes problem because the RMAC and neigh entry
corresponding to the previous nexthop are still lingering in the system.
We need to clear those entries for proper functoning.
Signed-off-by: Mitesh Kanjariya <mitesh@cumulusnetworks.com>
A newly added ipv4/ipv6 route in BGP RIB might be advertised as type-5 EVPN route.
The user might have configured a route-map for advertising type-5 routes.
We need to apply this route-map while advertising ipv4/ipv6 routes as type-5.
Signed-off-by: Mitesh Kanjariya <mitesh@cumulusnetworks.com>
EVPN prefix depends on the EVPN route type.
Currently, in FRR we have a prefix_evpn/evpn_addr which relates to a evpn prefix.
We need to convert this to encompass an union of various EVPN route-types.
This diff handles the necessary code changes to adopt the new struct evpn_addr.
Signed-off-by: Mitesh Kanjariya <mitesh@cumulusnetworks.com>
Add a policy-route API to handle flowspec entry.
The entry is analysed, converted, and
selected if it is possible to inject the flowspec entry in local policy
routing entries.
redirect IP and redirect VRF actions are handled. The former extracts
the IPv4 address to redirect traffic to. The latter calculates the
matching VRF to redirect traffic to.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
As part of recent vpn-vrf leaking changes, it is now possible for a
route to refer to a nexthop in a different vrf. There is also a new
route flag that means "when announcing this route, indicate myself
as the next-hop."
route_vty_out(): nexthops are appended with:
"@VRFID" (where VRFID is the numerical vrf id) when different from
the route's vrf;
"<" when the route's BGP_INFO_ANNC_NH_SELF is set
This change also shows the route table's vrf id in the table header.
route_vty_out_detail(): show nexthop's vrf and announce-nh-self flag if
appropriate.
Both functions are also augmented to add json elements nhVrfId, nhVrfName,
and announceNexthopSelf as appropriate.
The intent of these changes is to make it easier to understand/debug
the relationship between a route and its nexthops.
Signed-off-by: G. Paul Ziemba <paulz@labn.net>
The vrf 2 vrf route leaking auto-derives RD and RT and
installs the routes into the appropriate vpn table.
These routes when a operator configured ipv[4|6] vpn
neighbors were showing up off box. The RD and RT
values choosen are localy significant but globaly
useless and may cause confusion.
Put a special bit of code in to notice that we
should not be advertising these routes off box.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Here we have a block conditional on the nullity of a pointer, followed
by a dereferennce of the same pointer. Move the deref into the
conditional block.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
Most presumably, the nexthop IP is present, only when ECOM redirect IP
is present. The nexthop is displayed.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Routes that have labels must be sent via a nexthop that also has labels.
This change notes whether any path in a nexthop update from zebra contains
labels. If so, then the nexthop is valid for routes that have labels.
If a nexthop update has no labeled paths, then any labeled routes
referencing the nexthop are marked not valid.
Add a route flag BGP_INFO_ANNC_NH_SELF that means "advertise myself
as nexthop when announcing" so that we can track our notion of the
nexthop without revealing it to peers.
Signed-off-by: G. Paul Ziemba <paulz@labn.net>
This command gives detail about a FS entry which contains an IP that
matches one of the rules of the FS entry. The output is the same output
as when one does show bgp ipv4 flowspec detail
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
The json format is returd when requested from the two commands:
- show bgp ipv4 flowspec
- show bgp ipv4 flowspec detail
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
The show bgp ipv4 flowspec routine is made available, displays the
flowspec rules contained in the BGP FIB database, as well as the actions
to be done on those rules. Two routines are available:
show bgp ipv4 flowspec
show bgp ipv4 flowspec detail
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Flowspec entries do not need aggregation feature.
Actually, all flowspec entries are unique.
So, some check is done against aggregate functionalities in the code.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Ensure that only EVPN routes are flagged as such when installing into or
withdrawing from zebra, the earlier check broke L3VPN or VRF route-leaked
routes. Also, fix an incorrect check related to imported routes in path
selection.
Updates: bgpd: Use BGP_ROUTE_IMPORTED for EVPN [vivek]
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
The following types are nonstandard:
- u_char
- u_short
- u_int
- u_long
- u_int8_t
- u_int16_t
- u_int32_t
Replace them with the C99 standard types:
- uint8_t
- unsigned short
- unsigned int
- unsigned long
- uint8_t
- uint16_t
- uint32_t
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
When uninstalling routes from zebra, ensure that the BGP instance for
which processing is being done is used to derive the VRF. It is incorrect
to derive the VRF from the peer when dealing with scenarios like VRF route
leaking, EVPN symmetric/external routing etc., where the peer which sourced
the route could belong to a different VRF.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Mitesh Kanjariya <mitesh@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-18413
Reviewed By: CCR-6778
Testing Done: Manual testing of BGP route withdraw/delete, bgp-min
When a peer is removed the routes are withdrawn via bgp_process_main_one
As such we need to put a bit of code in to handle this situation
for the vpn/vrf route leaking code.
I think this code path is also called for when a vrf's route is
changed and I believe we will end up putting a bit more code
here to handle the nexthop changes.
I've also started trying to document the bgp_process_main_one
function a bit better.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Set EVPN routes imported into a VRF to (sub)type BGP_ROUTE_IMPORTED and
use this for passing appropriate information to zebra. This is needed
because relying on the Router MAC for this purpose was incorrect and
impacted routing to/from external destinations, particularly for IPv6.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
In bgp_update_receive the first thing we do is establish
that the peer->status is Established. We then do a bunch
of work and call bgp_nlri_parse where we break out for
each address family. Each AFI is then checking for
being peer->status is Established again. There is no
point in checking this again.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
- add "debug bgp vpn label" CLI
- improved debug messages for "debug bgp bestpath"
- send vrf label to zebra after zebra informs bgpd of vrf_id
- withdraw vrf_label from zebra if zebra informs bgpd that vrf_id is disabled
Signed-off-by: G. Paul Ziemba <paulz@labn.net>
Received PMSI tunnel attributes (in EVPN type-3 route) were not recognized.
Parse them and display the tunnel type when looking at routes. Note that
the only tunnel type currently supported is ingress replication (IR). A
warning message will be logged if the received tunnel type is something
else, but the attribute is otherwise ignored.
Updates: a21bd7a (bgpd: add PMSI_TUNNEL_ATTRIBUTE to EVPN IMET routes)
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Type-5 routes can be useful in multiple scenarios such as advertise-subnet,
default-originate etc. Currently, the code has a restriction that to allow
advertising type-5 routes, user has to first enable advertise ipvX command.
This restriction is not necessary and should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Mitesh Kanjariya <mitesh@cumulusnetworks.com>
