Currently when a directly connected peer is going down
BGP gets a call back for nexthop tracking in addition
the interface down events. On the interface down
event BGP goes through and sets up a per peer Q that
holds all the bgp path info's associated with that peer
and then it goes and processes this in the future. In
the meantime zebra is also at work and sends a nexthop
removal event to BGP as well. This triggers a complete
walk of all path info's associated with the bnc( which
happens to be all the path info's already scheduled
for removal here shortly). This evaluate paths
is not an inexpensive operation in addition the work
for handling this is already being done via the
peer down queue. Let's optimize the bnc handling
of evaluate paths and check to see if the peer is
still up to actually do the work here.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The application specific defines from rfc8919 were defined twice in the
isis tlv headers. Remove the second one.
Fixes: 5749ac83a8 ("isisd: add ASLA support")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Document where relevant about the instance overload to table ID so users
know what to expect.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Implement the necessary data structures and code changes to support sending
table-direct routes to protocols running in different VRFs.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
In this topotests, R1 is configured with an l3vni, while R2 is
configured with an l2vni. Update R2 config to match R1 config.
Signed-off-by: Loïc SANG <loic.sang@6wind.com>
Duplicate next-hops are maintained for OSPF inter-area and AS
external routes in the OSPF routing table as long as they
correspond to LSAs for different adverting routers. The
intra-area route computation will not result in duplicate
next-hops.
Signed-off-by: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>
OSPF topotest to test OSPF next-hop pruning on installation
into zebra routing table. Also fix multicast_pim_dr_nondr_test
topotest which had a duplicate OSPF route in the results.
Signed-off-by: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>
X
Version requirement from a BuildRequire get dropped and don't get
reflected in Require's for the package. Specify it both ways for
Libyang as we require >= 2.1.128
Signed-off-by: Martin Winter <mwinter@opensourcerouting.org>
Return error if IPv6 address or prefix is passed as an argument
to "show ip route" command.
UT:
r1# show ip route 2::3/128
% Cannot specify IPv6 address/prefix for IPv4 table
r1#
r1# show ip route 2::3
% Cannot specify IPv6 address/prefix for IPv4 table
r1#
Signed-off-by: Pooja Jagadeesh Doijode <pdoijode@nvidia.com>
There is no connectivity by using the proposed srv6 path.
> From Carmine:
> This seg6-route tells rt1 to steer packets destined to fc00:0:9::1 over this path: rt1->rt2->-rt6.
> This path is not correct. Since we are installing this seg6-route on rt1,
> it means that a packet matching this seg6-route has already reached rt1.
> So rt1 should not be part of the path.
> The correct path should be rt2->rt6.
Fix this by changing the proposed seg6 route. Also, the ping test should
be swapped, because invalidating the RT1 locator does not have any
impacts on the built SRv6 path.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
sbfd will use bfdname for key hash, We introduced a bfd-name for every sbfd session, normal BFD sessions can leave it as NULL.
A unique bfd-name can be used to identify a sbfd session quickly. This is quite useful in our Srv6 deployment for path protection case.
For example, if use the sbfd session to protect the SRv6 path A-B-D, we would assign the name 'path-a-b-d' or 'a-b-d' to the session.
Signed-off-by: wumu.zsl <wumu.zsl@alibaba-inc.com>
EVPN imported routes AF is not AF_EVPN, in that case
the path info extra with EVPN is nver created.
In order to create evpn info under path extra, define
new api which does not specifically check for AF_EVPN
afi type.
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@nvidia.com>
draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-oad says:
Extended communities which are non-transitive across an AS boundary MAY be
advertised over an EBGP-OAD session if allowed by explicit policy configuration.
If allowed, all the members of the OAD SHOULD be configured to use the same
criteria.
For example, the Origin Validation State Extended Community, defined as
non-transitive in [RFC8097], can be advertised to peers in the same OAD.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
The code doesn't push more than one group (currently) so wouldn't hit the
bug yet, nice catch by coverity.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hopps <chopps@labn.net>
With recent BMP code, on a standard BMP config, the peer up and peer
down messages related to a BGP peer are sent twice, whereas they should
be send only once.
Fix this by better controlling the condition.
Fixes: f8a6933111 ("bgpd: bmp, handle imported bgp instances for peer up/down events")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
