Implement all BFD integration northbound callbacks and integrate BFD
with `staticd` route installation procedure.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Test uses staticd which required some C++ header protections.
Additionally, the test also runs in the ubuntu20 docker container as
grpc is supported there by the packaging system.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hopps <chopps@labn.net>
When the user adds the route + nexthop pair that already exists with a
different distance, we should replace it instead of adding a new one.
Likewise, when the user wants to delete the route + nexthop pair without
explicitly entering the distance, we should delete the route.
Fixes#8695.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Compile with v2.0.0 tag of `libyang2` branch of:
https://github.com/CESNET/libyang
staticd init load time of 10k routes now 6s vs ly1 time of 150s
Signed-off-by: Christian Hopps <chopps@labn.net>
At present, libyang validate api takes longer time to complete
for a transaction to complete if the same config is re-applied.
For instance if set of static routes are reapplied the config
completion takes longer than it took initial time.
One of the solution is to remove when statement from staticd nexthop yang OM.
When condition adds peformance toll on libyang's validate api.
The same when condition checks are done in frr northbound
validation phase (which are must faster).
With this change, if the same static routes are configured
agian and again, the time to completion does not go up and
perfomance does not degrade.
Ticket:CM-32530
Testing Done:
Configure 400 static routes across two vrfs and keep re-applying them.
The time to complete the config remains in few seconds.
Before:
root@bharat:~/stash/frr4# time vtysh -f static_route_cfg
real 0m19.877s
user 0m0.263s
sys 0m0.014s
After:
root@bharat:~/stash/frr4# time vtysh -f static_route_cfg
real 0m3.857s
user 0m0.239s
sys 0m0.034s
Co-developed-by: VishalDhingra <vdhingra@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@nvidia.com>
problem: table-id gets overwritten for a given route.
RCA: table-id was getting overwritten from the NB layer,
So route was getting installed with the latest table-id.
Fix: make the table-id as the key in the NB layer.
This will program the route in zebra correctly.
- Removed the table-id modify callbacks.
- Moved the validate and apply table-id changes to path-list creation
issue #7347
Signed-off-by: vishaldhingra <vdhingra@vmware.com>
Configuration example:
ip route 9.9.9.9/32 6.6.6.6 color 123
The SR Policy to be chosen is uniquely identified by the policy
endpoint (6.6.6.6) and the SR-TE color (123). Traffic will be
augmented with an MPLS label stack according to the active
candidate path of that particular policy.
Co-authored-by: GalaxyGorilla <sascha@netdef.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
To address the ip mroute command there is a need to add
safi as a key. So adding the afi-safi-type identityref
as a key.
Signed-off-by: VishalDhingra <vdhingra@vmware.com>
1. Modifies the data structs to make the distance, tag and table-id
property of a route, i.e created a hireachical data struct to save
route and nexthop information.
2. Backend northbound implementation
Signed-off-by: VishalDhingra <vdhingra@vmware.com>
