This operation basically implements support for RESTCONF operations. It
receives an xpath and a data tree in JSON/XML format, instead of a list
of (xpath, value) tuples as required by the current protobuf interface.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
If supress-duplicates is turned of (which is turned on by default), do not
calculate attribute hash key, that consumes CPU quite a lot.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
BGP is now keeping a list of dests with the dest having a pointer
to the bgp_path_info that it will be working on.
1) When bgp receives a prefix, process it, add the bgp_dest of the
prefix into the new Fifo list if not present, update the flags (Ex:
earlier if the prefix was advertised and now it is a withdrawn),
increment the ref_count and DO NOT advertise the install/withdraw
to zebra yet.
2) Schedule an event to wake up to invoke the new function which will
walk the list one by one and installs/withdraws the routes into zebra.
a) if BUFFER_EMPTY, process the next item on the list
b) if BUFFER_PENDING, bail out and the callback in
zclient_flush_data() will invoke the same function when BUFFER_EMPTY
Changes
- rename old bgp_zebra_announce to bgp_zebra_announce_actual
- rename old bgp_zebra_withdrw to bgp_zebra_withdraw_actual
- Handle new fifo list cleanup in bgp_exit()
- New funcs: bgp_handle_route_announcements_to_zebra() and
bgp_zebra_route_install()
- Define a callback function to invoke
bgp_handle_route_announcements_to_zebra() when BUFFER_EMPTY in
zclient_flush_data()
The current change deals with bgp installing routes via
bgp_process_main_one()
Ticket: #3390099
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajasekar Raja <rajasekarr@nvidia.com>
Since installing/withdrawing routes into zebra is going to be changed
around to be dest based in a list,
- Retrieve the afi/safi to use based upon the dest's afi/safi
instead of passing it in.
- Prefix is known by the dest. Remove this arg as well
Ticket: #3390099
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajasekar Raja <rajasekarr@nvidia.com>
Modify the bgp master to hold a type safe list for bgp_dests that need
to be passed to zebra.
Future commits will use this.
Ticket: #3390099
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajasekar Raja <rajasekarr@nvidia.com>
A specific sequence of actions involving the addition and removal of IP
routes and network interfaces can lead to a route installation failure.
The issue occurs under the following conditions:
- Initially, there is no route present via the ens3 interface.
- Adds a route: ip route 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.0.100 ens3
- Removes the same route: no ip route 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.0.100 ens3
- Removes the ens3 interface.
- Re-adds the ens3 interface.
- Again adds the same route: ip route 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.0.100 ens3
- And again removes it: no ip route 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.0.100 ens3
- Shuts down the ens3 interface
- Reactivates the interface
- Adds the route once more: ip route 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.0.100 ens3
The route appears to be rejected.
> # show ip route nexthop
> S>r 10.0.0.0/24 [1/0] (6) via 192.168.0.100, ens3, weight 1, 00:00:01
The commit 35729f38fa ("zebra: Add a timer to nexthop group deletion")
introduced a feature to keep a nexthop-group in Zebra for a certain
period even when it is no longer in use. But if a nexthop-group
interface is removed during this period, the association between the
nexthop-group and the interface is lost in zebra memory. If the
interface is later added back and a route is re-established, the
nexthop-group interface dependency is not correctly reestablished.
As a consequence, the nexthop-group flags remain unset when the
interface is down. Upon the interface's reactivation, zebra does not
reinstall the nexthop-group in the kernel because it is marked as valid
and installed, but in reality, it does not exist in the kernel (it was
removed when the interface was down). Thus, attempts to install a route
via this nexthop-group ID fail.
Stop maintaining a nexthop-group when its associated interface is no
longer present.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
OSPF intra/inter area routes were previously marked to assure they
are re-installed after a fast link flap in the commit:
commit effee18744
Author: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon May 24 13:45:29 2021 -0400
ospfd: Fix quick interface down up event handling in ospf
This commit extends this fix to OSPF AS External routes as well.
Signed-off-by: Acee <aceelindem@gmail.com>
lib: don't define a `fallthrough` in c++ to avoid conflict with protobuf c++
check: add link libs required by some versions of grpc++ or it's dependent
linked libs
tests: don't fail the test due to known at exit memleaks
Signed-off-by: Christian Hopps <chopps@labn.net>
Dynamic capability provides more value without resetting the sessions for some
important other capabilities to exchange, like: graceful-restart, addpath, orf,
fqdn, etc.
Since we support it already, enable it by default.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
When running `show ip bgp` command, the 'route short status' and
'network' columns do not have white-space between them.
Old show:
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*>i1.1.1.1/32 10.1.12.111 0 100 0 i
New show:
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*>i 1.1.1.1/32 10.1.12.111 0 100 0 i
Added white-space to enhance readability between them.
Signed-off-by: Cassiano Campes <cassiano.campes@venkonetworks.com>
With this fix, OSPF LS Updates sent in response to OSPF LS Requests during the DB Exchange process will be sent as unicasts. Unless the timing of multiple database exchanges coincides, there is little chance that the LSAs in the LS Update are required by OSPF routers other than the one which elicited the LS Update.
This is somewhat ambigous in RFC 2328 and two errata have been filed for clarification:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7850https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7851
FRR OSPFv3 (ospf6d) already does it correctly - see ospf6_lsupdate_send_neighbor(struct event *thread). Also, if there is any doubt, one can refer to the C++ code at ospf.org (John Moy's seminal OSPF reference implementation).
Signed-off-by: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>
We're not calling any other termination functions to free allocated
memory when daemonizing except these two. There's no reason for such an
exception, and because of these calls we have the following libyang
warnings every time FRR is started:
```
MGMTD: libyang: String "15" not freed from the dictionary, refcount 2
MGMTD: libyang: String "200" not freed from the dictionary, refcount 2
MGMTD: libyang: String "mrib-then-urib" not freed from the dictionary, refcount 2
MGMTD: libyang: String "1000" not freed from the dictionary, refcount 2
MGMTD: libyang: String "10" not freed from the dictionary, refcount 2
MGMTD: libyang: String "5" not freed from the dictionary, refcount 2
```
Remove these calls to get rid of the unnecessary warnings.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
