Extend SRv6 End SID Sub-TLV format function to return information about
Sub-Sub-TLVs (RFC 9352 section #7.2).
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Add a function to pack all the Sub-Sub-TLVs passed as an argument.
At this time, this function does not pack any Sub-Sub-TLVs because no
Sub-Sub-TLVs have been defined yet. This function will be extended in
future commits to pack specific Sub-Sub-TLVs, as they become supported.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Add a function to free all the Sub-Sub-TLVs and the `isis_subsubtlvs`
data structure passed as an argument.
At this time, this function only frees the `isis_subsubtlvs`. It does
not free any specific Sub-Sub-TLVs because no Sub-Sub-TLVs have been
defined yet. This function will be extended in future commits to free
specific Sub-Sub-TLVs, as they become supported.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Add a function to return information about all the Sub-Sub-TLVs passed
as an argument.
At this time, this function does nothing because no Sub-Sub-TLVs have
been defined yet. This function will be extended in
future commits to return information about specific Sub-Sub-TLVs,
as they become supported.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Add a function to copy all the Sub-Sub-TLVs passed as an argument.
At this time, this function does not copy any Sub-Sub-TLVs because no
Sub-Sub-TLVs have been defined yet. This function will be extended in
future commits to copy specific Sub-Sub-TLVs, as they become supported.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Add a data structure to store IS-IS Sub-Sub-TLVs information. At this
time, does not contain any Sub-Sub-TLV information because no
Sub-Sub-TLVs have been defined yet. This data structure will be extended
in future commits to store specific Sub-Sub-TLVs, as they become
supported.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Add two macros `SUBSUBTLV_OPS` and `ITEM_SUBSUBTLV_OPS` that help the
developer to define the TLV operations for the IS-IS Sub-Sub-TLVs.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Extend generic Sub-TLVs format function to return information about
SRv6 End SID Sub-TLVs (RFC 9352 section #7.2).
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
General Sub-TLV processing functions (i.e., copy, format, free, pack,
and unpack) perform a lookup of the specific handler for a Sub-TLV in
the `tlv_table`, and then call the specific handler to process the
Sub-TLV.
This commit adds the handlers for the SRv6 End SID Sub-TLV (stored in
`tlv_srv6_end_sid_ops`) to the `tlv_table`.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Use the ITEM_SUBTLV_OPS macro to define the TLV operations for the SRv6
End SID Sub-TLV (RFC 9352 section #7.2).
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
The pdest pointer is locked by the bgp_node_get so
unlocking it should be fine and it should still exist.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
dest could be freed by the first unlock, but should
not be due to our locking structure. Ensure coverity
understands this.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Unsetting a flag after the dest has been possibly been
freed is not a good thing to do. Ensure that this
is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This is incase it has been freed ( it wont due to locking )
and then we need to ensure that we can continue to use
the pointer.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Again coverity believes that dest could be freed by a call
into bgp_dest_unlock_node, and it can if the lock count
is wrong. Let's fix that assumption for coverity
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The bgp_cleanup_routes function holds the lock for dest
while walking it. Ensure that coverity understands this
proposition.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Again the dest pointer should be still locked by the table walk. Ensure
that coverity is happy that this is not happening.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Again coverity believes that dest may be freed but it should not
be because of how locking is done. Make coverity happy.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The dest pointer may be freed( but should not be
due to locking ). Let's ensure that this assumption
is true and make coverity happy.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
There exist two spots in this function where the dest could be
freed, but is not due to locking, but coverity thinks it might
so let's make the function happy.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
But never really does due to locking, but since it can
we need to treat it like it does and ensure that FRR
is not making a mistake, by using memory after it
has been freed.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Add a function to return information about an SRv6 End SID Sub-TLV
(RFC 9352 section #7.2).
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Add a new TLV context value for the SRv6 End SID Sub-TLV. It will be
needed to support unpacking of the Sub-Sub-TLVs of the SRv6 End SID
Sub-TLV in future commits.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Add a data structure to represent an SRv6 End SID Sub-TLV as per
RFC 9352 section #7.2.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
The SRv6 Locator TLV (RFC 9352 section #7.1) starts with the MTID field.
Let's expect the MTID as the first field when we are unpacking an SRv6
Locator TLV.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
The SRv6 Locator TLV (RFC 9352 section #7.1) starts with the MTID field.
Let's put the MTID as the first field when we are packing an SRv6
Locator TLV.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
