Problem:
Execute the below commands, pim6d core happens.
interface ens193
ip address 69.0.0.2/24
ipv6 address 8000::1/120
ipv6 mld
ipv6 pim
We see crash only if the interface is not configured, and
we are executing PIM/MLD commands.
RootCause:
Interface ens193 is not configured. So, it will have
ifindex = 0 and mroute_vif_index = -1.
Currently, we don't enable MLD on an interface if
mroute_vif_index < 0. So, pim_ifp->MLD = NULL.
In the API pim_if_membership_refresh(), we are accessing
pim_ifp->MLD NULL pointer which leads to crash.
Fix:
Added NULL check before accessing pim_ifp->MLD pointer in
the API pim_if_membership_refresh().
Issue: #13385
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6d1d2c27a3)
When the router is non dr for an interface, it installs mroute to drop
the packets from directly connected source. This was done to avoid packets
coming to cpu as nocache hit. Later when it gets change from non-DR to DR,
these entries are not cleared. So the packets are still dropped.
This causes register packets not getting generated.
So cleaning up the mroute entries and channel oil without
upstream reference which was created to drop.
Co-authored-by: Saravanan K <saravanank@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1c883aef96)
After doing "no ipv6 pim" and "ipv6 pim" on receiver interface in LHR,
mroutes were not created.
When we enable pim after disabling it, we refresh the membership on pim interface.
First we clear the membership on the interface, then we add it back.
For PIMv6 we were only clearing it, membership was not added back. So mroutes were not created.
Now added code to fetch all the local membership information into PIM.
Fixes: #12005, #12820
Signed-off-by: Abhishek N R <abnr@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 00fed6ed3b)
Topology Used:
=============
Cisco---FRR4----FRR2
Initially PIM nbr is down between FRR4----FRR2 from FRR2 side
Cisco is sending BSR packet to FRR4.
Problem Statement:
=================
No shutdown the PIM neighbor on FRR2 towards FRR4.
FRR2, receives BSR packet immediately as the new neighbor
comes up. This BSR packet is having no-forward bit set.
FRR2 is not able to process the BSR packet, and drop the
BSR packet.
Root Cause:
==========
When PIMD comes up, we start BSM timer for 60 seconds.
Here, the value accept_nofwd_bsm is setting to false.
FRR2, when receives no-forward BSR packet, it is getting
accept_nofwd_bsm value as false.
So, it drops, the no-forward BSM packet.
Fix:
===
Set accept_nofwd_bsm as false after first BSM packet received.
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8b462d5579)
We have this valgrind trace:
==1125== Invalid read of size 4
==1125== at 0x170A7D: pim_if_delete (pim_iface.c:203)
==1125== by 0x170C01: pim_if_terminate (pim_iface.c:80)
==1125== by 0x174F34: pim_instance_terminate (pim_instance.c:68)
==1125== by 0x17535B: pim_vrf_terminate (pim_instance.c:260)
==1125== by 0x1941CF: pim_terminate (pimd.c:161)
==1125== by 0x1B476D: pim_sigint (pim_signals.c:44)
==1125== by 0x4910C22: frr_sigevent_process (sigevent.c:133)
==1125== by 0x49220A4: thread_fetch (thread.c:1777)
==1125== by 0x48DC8E2: frr_run (libfrr.c:1222)
==1125== by 0x15E12A: main (pim_main.c:176)
==1125== Address 0x6274d28 is 1,192 bytes inside a block of size 1,752 free'd
==1125== at 0x48369AB: free (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==1125== by 0x174FF1: pim_vrf_delete (pim_instance.c:181)
==1125== by 0x4925480: vrf_delete (vrf.c:264)
==1125== by 0x4925480: vrf_delete (vrf.c:238)
==1125== by 0x49332C7: zclient_vrf_delete (zclient.c:2187)
==1125== by 0x4934319: zclient_read (zclient.c:4003)
==1125== by 0x492249C: thread_call (thread.c:2008)
==1125== by 0x48DC8D7: frr_run (libfrr.c:1223)
==1125== by 0x15E12A: main (pim_main.c:176)
==1125== Block was alloc'd at
==1125== at 0x4837B65: calloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==1125== by 0x48E80AF: qcalloc (memory.c:116)
==1125== by 0x1750DA: pim_instance_init (pim_instance.c:90)
==1125== by 0x1750DA: pim_vrf_new (pim_instance.c:161)
==1125== by 0x4924FDC: vrf_get (vrf.c:183)
==1125== by 0x493334C: zclient_vrf_add (zclient.c:2157)
==1125== by 0x4934319: zclient_read (zclient.c:4003)
==1125== by 0x492249C: thread_call (thread.c:2008)
==1125== by 0x48DC8D7: frr_run (libfrr.c:1223)
==1125== by 0x15E12A: main (pim_main.c:176)
and you do this series of events:
a) Create a vrf, put an interface in it
b) Turn on pim on that interface and turn on pim in that vrf
c) Delete the vrf
d) Do anything with the interface, in this case shutdown the system
The move of the interface to a new vrf is leaving the pim_ifp->pim pointer pointing
at the old pim instance, which was just deleted, so the instance pointer was freed.
Let's clean up the pim pointer in the interface pointer as well.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
(cherry picked from commit e60308f498)
New correct behavior:
eva# conf
eva(config)# ip pim rp 192.168.1.224 224.0.0.0/24
No Path to RP address specified: 192.168.1.224
eva(config)# ip pim rp 224.1.2.3 224.0.0.0/24
% Bad RP address specified: 224.1.2.3
eva(config)#
Fixes: #12970
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8083e71356)
Topology:
========
FHR----Source
Problem:
=======
When FHR receives multicast traffic, there is no RP configured,
PIMD does NHT register for RP address 0.0.0.0 and group 224.0.0.0/4
PIM6D does NHT register for RP address 0::0 and group FF00::0/8
frr# show ip pim nexthop
Number of registered addresses: 1
Address Interface Nexthop
---------------------------------------------
frr# show ipv6 pim nexthop
Number of registered addresses: 1
Address Interface Nexthop
---------------------------------------------
Fix:
====
Dont track nexthop for RP 0.0.0.0 & 0::0.
frr# show ip pim nexthop
Number of registered addresses: 0
frr# show ipv6 pim nexthop
Number of registered addresses: 0
Issue: #12104
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 201a31b977)
If the pimreg device exists but it has not been set to the pim->pimreg pointer we can have
a crash. Just prevent the crash since it's some sort of startup / re-org the network
issue.
(gdb) bt
0 0x00007f0485b035cb in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
1 0x00007f0485c0fbec in core_handler (signo=6, siginfo=0x7ffdc0198030, context=<optimized out>) at lib/sigevent.c:264
2 <signal handler called>
3 0x00007f04859668eb in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
4 0x00007f0485951535 in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
5 0x00007f0485c3af76 in _zlog_assert_failed (xref=xref@entry=0x55692269b940 <_xref.23164>, extra=extra@entry=0x0) at lib/zlog.c:680
6 0x00005569226150d0 in pim_if_new (ifp=0x556922c82900, gm=gm@entry=false, pim=pim@entry=false, ispimreg=ispimreg@entry=true,
is_vxlan_term=is_vxlan_term@entry=false) at pimd/pim_iface.c:124
7 0x0000556922615140 in pim_if_create_pimreg (pim=pim@entry=0x556922cc11e0) at pimd/pim_iface.c:1549
8 0x0000556922616bc8 in pim_if_create_pimreg (pim=0x556922cc11e0) at pimd/pim_iface.c:1613
9 pim_ifp_create (ifp=0x556922cc0e70) at pimd/pim_iface.c:1641
10 0x00007f0485c32cf9 in zclient_interface_add (cmd=<optimized out>, zclient=<optimized out>, length=<optimized out>, vrf_id=77) at lib/zclient.c:2214
11 0x00007f0485c3346a in zclient_read (thread=<optimized out>) at lib/zclient.c:4003
12 0x00007f0485c215ed in thread_call (thread=thread@entry=0x7ffdc0198880) at lib/thread.c:2008
13 0x00007f0485bdbbc8 in frr_run (master=0x556922a10470) at lib/libfrr.c:1223
14 0x000055692260312b in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7ffdc0198b98, envp=<optimized out>) at pimd/pim_main.c:176
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7ae7a3bfd6)
When upstream RPF address is secondary address, and
neighborship is built with primary address,
then pim_neighbor_find() fails.
Verify the upstream RPF address is present in the
neighbor primary and secondary address list.
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit d77da853f0)
When upstream RPF address is secondary, and
neighborship is built with primary address,
then pim_neighbor_find() fails, due to which when there
is upstream change it wont send prune.
Verify the nexthop is present in the neighbor primary
and secondary address list.
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 689b9f10fc)
When there is a mismatch in nexthop address (secondary address)
and neighborship address(primary address) on the same interface,
RPF check fails.
This is fixed now.
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit e14ba24874)
When route to RP is having nexthop secndary address,
neighborship is built with primary address,
then pim_neighbor_find() fails, which causes RP IIF
Unknown.
Fix:
Verify pim neighborship on the RP connected interface.
Issue: #11526
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit ae5bcac0ae)
Problem 1:
When route to BSR is having nexthop secondary address,
neighborship is built with primary address,
then pim_neighbor_find() fails, which cause drop of BSM
packet.
Fix 1:
Verify pim neighborship on the BSM received interface.
Problem 2:
Problem 2:
Source IP BSM address is primary address, where
as nexthop also can be primary or secondary address.
Fix 2:
Avoiding the check (nhaddr == src_ip) for PIMV6
Issue: #11957
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2c6a32f9be)
Modify pim_neighbor_find() API to find the neighbor
in neighbor secondary list.
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3dbf370ac0)
Before fix:
==========
frr# show ipv6 mld interface
Interface State V Querier Timer Uptime
ens224 up 1 fe80::250:56ff:feb7:a7e3 query 00:00:24.219 00:00:07.031
After fix:
=========
frr(config-if)# do show ipv6 mld interface
Interface State Address V Querier QuerierIp Query Timer Uptime
ens224 up fe80::250:56ff:feb7:a7e3 1 local fe80::250:56ff:feb7:a7e3 00:01:22.263 00:08:00.237
Issue: #11241
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit cbb1e51311)
We should not display down interfaces or MLD disabled interfaces in
"show ipv6 mld interface" command.
Before fix:
==========
frr# show ipv6 mld interface
Interface State V Querier Timer Uptime
ens192 up 2 fe80::250:56ff:feb7:d04 query 00:00:25.432 00:00:07.038
ens224 up 1 fe80::250:56ff:feb7:a7e3 query 00:00:24.219 00:00:07.031
pim6reg down
After fix:
=========
frr# show ipv6 mld interface
Interface State V Querier Timer Uptime
ens192 up 2 fe80::250:56ff:feb7:d04 query 00:00:25.432 00:00:07.038
ens224 up 1 fe80::250:56ff:feb7:a7e3 query 00:00:24.219 00:00:07.031
Issue: #11241
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit fe4db62c3d)
Topology:
=========
RP---FHR<ens224>---Source
Problem Statement:
=================
Step 1:
Enable PIM and IGMP on source connected interface ens224
Step 2:
Start multicast traffic. (s,g) mroute and upstream will be created as expected.
dev# show ip mroute
IP Multicast Routing Table
Flags: S - Sparse, C - Connected, P - Pruned
R - SGRpt Pruned, F - Register flag, T - SPT-bit for SSM FHR
Source Group Flags Proto Input Output TTL Uptime
50.0.0.4 225.1.1.1 SF PIM ens224 pimreg 1 00:37:55
dev# show ip pim upstream
Iif Source Group State Uptime JoinTimer RSTimer KATimer RefCnt
ens224 50.0.0.4 225.1.1.1 NotJ,RegJ 00:37:57 --:--:-- --:--:-- 00:02:43 1
Step 3:
Disable PIM on source connected interafce ens224
dev# show ip mroute
IP Multicast Routing Table
Flags: S - Sparse, C - Connected, P - Pruned
R - SGRpt Pruned, F - Register flag, T - SPT-bit for SSM FHR
Source Group Flags Proto Input Output TTL Uptime
50.0.0.4 225.1.1.1 SF PIM ens224 pimreg 1 00:38:05
dev# show ip pim upstream
Iif Source Group State Uptime JoinTimer RSTimer KATimer RefCnt
ens224 50.0.0.4 225.1.1.1 NotJ,RegJ 00:38:08 --:--:-- --:--:-- 00:02:32 1
Step 4:
Disable IGMP on source connected interface ens224
dev# show ip pim upstream
Iif Source Group State Uptime JoinTimer RSTimer KATimer RefCnt
ens224 50.0.0.4 225.1.1.1 NotJ,RegJ 00:38:15 --:--:-- --:--:-- 00:03:27 1
dev# show ip mroute
IP Multicast Routing Table
Flags: S - Sparse, C - Connected, P - Pruned
R - SGRpt Pruned, F - Register flag, T - SPT-bit for SSM FHR
Source Group Flags Proto Input Output TTL Uptime
50.0.0.4 225.1.1.1 SF PIM <iif?> pimreg 1 00:38:18
Pim upstream IIF is still pointing towards the source connected
interface which is not pim enabled and not IGMP enabled and
Mroute is still present in the kernel and KAT timer is still running
on the interface, where ifp->info is already set to NULL.
This leads to crash.
Root Cause:
==========
When "no ip pim" commands get executed on source connected interface,
we are updating upstream IIF only when IGMP is not enabled on the same
interface.
Fix:
===
When PIM is disabled on source connected interface, update upstream IIF
no matter if IGMP is enabled or not on the same interface.
Issue: #12848
Issue: #10782
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9e01548593)
Whether due to a pimd bug, some expiry, or someone just deleting MFC
entries, when we're in NOCACHE we *know* there's no MFC entry. Add an
install call to make sure pimd's MFC view aligns with the actual kernel
MFC.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
This path here is pretty far on top of the list of issues that operators
will run into and have to debug when setting up PIM. Make the log
messages actually tell what's going on. Also escalate some from
`debug mroute detail` to `debug mroute`.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Passing a pre-formatted buffer in these places needs a `"%s"` in front
so it doesn't get formatted twice.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Use `getpid()` to initialize the sequence number. This change silences
Coverity Scan warning about truncated use of `time()` which in this case
is not a problem.
Found by Coverity Scan (CID 1519828)
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Topology:
========
Receiver----R1----(ens192)R2(ens224)----R3----R4----Source
--------------------------
R1=LHR
R2=RP
R4=FHR
Problem:
=======
1. Direct connected link between R1 and R3 is down initially.
2. So traffic flow path is R4<->R3<->R2<->R1<->Receiver.
3. Mroutes are properly created on all the nodes.
4. Up the direct connected link between R1 and R3.
5. Traffic flows in both the paths.
R4<->R3<->R2<->R1<->Receiver
R4<->R3<->R1<->Receiver
6. Duplicate traffic received at the receiver.
Root Cause:
==========
Initially when the direct connected link between R1 and R3 is
down, traffic flows via RP(R2). So in RP (S,G) installed with
IIF as ens224 and OIF as ens192 (reference = 2) with mask
PIM_OIF_FLAG_PROTO_STAR and PIM_OIF_FLAG_PROTO_PIM.
Now when the direct link between R1 and R3 is Up, LHR(R1) sends
SGRPT prune. After prune received, RP(R2) will remove OIF ens224
with mask PIM_OIF_FLAG_PROTO_STAR.
Since OIF ens224 is still present with mask PIM_OIF_FLAG_PROTO_PIM,
RP(R2) will not send prune towards R3.
So traffic continues to flow in the path R4<->R3<->R2<->R1<->Receiver.
Fix:
====
When SGRpt prune received, remove OIF irrespective of the OIF is
installed with mask "PIM_OIF_FLAG_PROTO_STAR" or "PIM_OIF_FLAG_PROTO_PIM".
Once OIF is removed, RP sends prune towards R3.
Issue: #11347
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Add some safe guards to avoid crashes and alert us about programming
errors in packet build.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Increase the MSDP peer stream buffer size to handle the whole TLV
(maximum is 65KiB due to 16bit field). If the stream is not resized
there will be a crash in the read function attempting to put more than
9192 (`PIM_MSDP_SA_TLV_MAX_SIZE`) bytes.
According to the RFC 3618 Section 12 we should accept the TLV and we
should not reset the peer connection.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
As per RFC 7761, Section 4.9.1
The RPT (or Rendezvous Point Tree) bit is a 1-bit value for use
with PIM Join/Prune messages (see Section 4.9.5.1). If the
WC bit is 1, the RPT bit MUST be 1.
ANVL conformance test case is trying to verify this and is failing.
Issue: #12354
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
As per RFC 7761, Section 4.9.1
The RPT (or Rendezvous Point Tree) bit is a 1-bit value for use
with PIM Join/Prune messages (see Section 4.9.5.1). If the
WC bit is 1, the RPT bit MUST be 1.
ANVL conformance test case is trying to verify this and is failing.
Issue: #12354
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
While doing nexthop lookup, only allow the nexthop
interafce which is PIM enabled.
Issue: #10782
Issue: #11931
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Problem:
When "no ip pim" is executed on source connected interface, its
ifp->info is set to NULL. But KAT on this interface is still
running, it wrongly dereferences NULL. This leads to crash.
Root Cause:
pim upstream IIF is still pointing towards the source connected
interface which is not pim enabled and Mroute is still present in
the kernel.
Fix:
When “no ip pim” command gets executed on source connected interface,
then loop through all the pnc->nexthop, if any new nexthop found,
then update the upstream IIF accordindly, if not found then update
the upstream IIF as Unknown and uninstall the mroute from kernel.
When “ip pim” command gets executed on source connected interface,
then also loop through all the pnc->nexthop and update the upstream IIF,
install the mroute in kernel.
Issue: #10782
Issue: #11931
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
Bring error handling up front and delay creating socket so that
we don't think too much about closing the socket in error cases.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
Saw this EC log:
```
PIM: [WX4HZ-FA72S][EC 100663307] pim_rp_find_match_group: BUG We should have found default group information
```
The root cause is group address of "0.0.0.0" is wrongly introduced into
`pim_rp_find_match_group()`. So add a check to avoid it.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
