mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_frr
synced 2025-08-06 06:14:35 +00:00
Merge pull request #10558 from Jafaral/ospf-net-or-iface
doc: mixing `ip ospf` and `network` commands is not supported
This commit is contained in:
commit
ebde4d03c1
@ -268,8 +268,10 @@ To start OSPF process you have to specify the OSPF router.
|
||||
the destination prefix. Otherwise, we test whether the network command prefix
|
||||
contains the local address prefix of the interface.
|
||||
|
||||
In some cases it may be more convenient to enable OSPF on a per
|
||||
interface/subnet basis (:clicmd:`ip ospf area AREA [ADDR]`).
|
||||
It is also possible to enable OSPF on a per interface/subnet basis
|
||||
using the interface command (:clicmd:`ip ospf area AREA [ADDR]`).
|
||||
However, mixing both network commands (:clicmd:`network`) and interface
|
||||
commands (:clicmd:`ip ospf`) on the same router is not supported.
|
||||
|
||||
.. clicmd:: proactive-arp
|
||||
|
||||
@ -515,12 +517,14 @@ Interfaces
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Enable OSPF on the interface, optionally restricted to just the IP address
|
||||
given by `ADDR`, putting it in the `AREA` area. Per interface area settings
|
||||
take precedence to network commands
|
||||
(:clicmd:`network A.B.C.D/M area A.B.C.D`).
|
||||
given by `ADDR`, putting it in the `AREA` area. If you have a lot of
|
||||
interfaces, and/or a lot of subnets, then enabling OSPF via this command
|
||||
instead of (:clicmd:`network A.B.C.D/M area A.B.C.D`) may result in a
|
||||
slight performance improvement.
|
||||
|
||||
If you have a lot of interfaces, and/or a lot of subnets, then enabling OSPF
|
||||
via this command may result in a slight performance improvement.
|
||||
Notice that, mixing both network commands (:clicmd:`network`) and interface
|
||||
commands (:clicmd:`ip ospf`) on the same router is not supported.
|
||||
If (:clicmd:`ip ospf`) is present, (:clicmd:`network`) commands will fail.
|
||||
|
||||
.. clicmd:: ip ospf authentication-key AUTH_KEY
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user