proxmox-mirrors/mirror_frr
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_frr synced 2025-08-14 10:37:29 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tests: run black over mcast-pim-static, static_routing_with_[ei]bgp

Browse Source 
Run black and clean up formatting along with pylint cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@voltanet.io>
This commit is contained in:
Mark Stapp 2021-04-13 13:34:57 -04:00
parent ec3ed7234d
commit d7265db9b3
9 changed files with 888 additions and 523 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

129
tests/topotests/multicast-pim-static-rp-topo1/test_multicast_pim_static_rp.py
View File

@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ class CreateTopo(Topo):
""" Dummy """
print("%s", self.name)
def setup_module(mod):
"""
Sets up the pytest environment
@ -272,9 +273,7 @@ def teardown_module():
# Stop toplogy and Remove tmp files
tgen.stop_topology()
logger.info(
"Testsuite end time: %s", time.asctime(time.localtime(time.time()))
)
logger.info("Testsuite end time: %s", time.asctime(time.localtime(time.time())))
logger.info("=" * 40)
@ -338,10 +337,8 @@ def verify_mroute_repopulated(uptime_before, uptime_after):
)
return errormsg
d_1 = datetime.datetime.strptime(uptime_before[group][source],
"%H:%M:%S")
d_2 = datetime.datetime.strptime(uptime_after[group][source],
"%H:%M:%S")
d_1 = datetime.datetime.strptime(uptime_before[group][source], "%H:%M:%S")
d_2 = datetime.datetime.strptime(uptime_after[group][source], "%H:%M:%S")
if d_2 >= d_1:
errormsg = "mroute (%s, %s) is not " "repopulated [FAILED!!]" % (
source,
@ -365,7 +362,7 @@ def verify_state_incremented(state_before, state_after):
"""
for router, state_data in state_before.items():
for state, _ in state_data.items():
for state, _ in state_data.items():
if state_before[router][state] >= state_after[router][state]:
errormsg = (
"[DUT: %s]: state %s value has not"
@ -498,7 +495,8 @@ def test_add_delete_static_RP_p0(request):
step("r1: Verify RP info")
result = verify_pim_rp_info(
tgen, TOPO, dut, GROUP_RANGE_ALL, iif, rp_address, SOURCE)
tgen, TOPO, dut, GROUP_RANGE_ALL, iif, rp_address, SOURCE
)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "r1: RP info present \n Error: {}".format(
@ -513,9 +511,7 @@ def test_add_delete_static_RP_p0(request):
)
step("r1: Verify upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r1: upstream join state is up and join timer is running \n Error: {}".format(
@ -690,8 +686,7 @@ def test_SPT_RPT_path_same_p1(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("r3: Verify (S, G) upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r3: (S, G) upstream join state is up and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
@ -759,8 +754,9 @@ def test_not_reachable_static_RP_p0(request):
state_before = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
assert isinstance(
state_before, dict
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " \
"Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " "Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
step("Enable IGMP on r1 interface and send IGMP " "join (225.1.1.1) to r1")
step("Configure r2 loopback interface as RP")
@ -842,9 +838,7 @@ def test_not_reachable_static_RP_p0(request):
"r1: join state should not be joined and join timer should stop,"
"verify using show ip pim upstream"
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r1: join state is joined and timer is not stopped \n Error: {}".format(
@ -859,8 +853,9 @@ def test_not_reachable_static_RP_p0(request):
state_after = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
assert isinstance(
state_after, dict
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " \
"Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " "Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
result = verify_state_incremented(state_before, state_after)
assert result is True, "Testcase{} : Failed Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
@ -950,14 +945,13 @@ def test_add_RP_after_join_received_p1(request):
state_before = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
assert isinstance(
state_before, dict
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " \
"Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " "Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
step("r0 : Send IGMP join (225.1.1.1) to r1, when rp is not configured" "in r1")
result = iperfSendIGMPJoin(tgen, "r0", GROUP_ADDRESS, join_interval=1)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("r1: IGMP group is received on R1 verify using show ip igmp groups")
oif = "r1-r0-eth0"
@ -973,9 +967,7 @@ def test_add_RP_after_join_received_p1(request):
step("r1: Verify upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r1: upstream join state is joined and timer is running \n Error: {}".format(
@ -1042,8 +1034,9 @@ def test_add_RP_after_join_received_p1(request):
state_after = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
assert isinstance(
state_after, dict
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " \
"Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " "Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
result = verify_state_incremented(state_before, state_after)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
@ -1090,8 +1083,9 @@ def test_reachable_static_RP_after_join_p0(request):
state_before = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
assert isinstance(
state_before, dict
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " \
"Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " "Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
step("r1: Make RP un-reachable")
dut = "r1"
@ -1127,9 +1121,7 @@ def test_reachable_static_RP_after_join_p0(request):
)
step("r1 : Verify upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, STAR, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r1: upstream join state is joined and timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
@ -1188,8 +1180,9 @@ def test_reachable_static_RP_after_join_p0(request):
state_after = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
assert isinstance(
state_after, dict
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " \
"Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " "Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
result = verify_state_incremented(state_before, state_after)
assert result is True, "Testcase{} : Failed Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
@ -1279,8 +1272,9 @@ def test_send_join_on_higher_preffered_rp_p1(request):
state_before = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
assert isinstance(
state_before, dict
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " \
"Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " "Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
step("r0 : Send IGMP join for 225.1.1.1")
result = iperfSendIGMPJoin(tgen, "r0", GROUP_ADDRESS, join_interval=1)
@ -1328,8 +1322,9 @@ def test_send_join_on_higher_preffered_rp_p1(request):
state_after = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
assert isinstance(
state_after, dict
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " \
"Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " "Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
result = verify_state_incremented(state_before, state_after)
assert result is True, "Testcase{} : Failed Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
@ -1359,8 +1354,9 @@ def test_send_join_on_higher_preffered_rp_p1(request):
state_before = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
assert isinstance(
state_before, dict
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " \
"Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " "Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
step("r1 : Delete RP configuration for 225.1.1.1")
input_dict = {
@ -1389,9 +1385,7 @@ def test_send_join_on_higher_preffered_rp_p1(request):
step("r1 : Verify rp-info for group 225.1.1.1")
iif = "r1-r4-eth3"
result = verify_pim_rp_info(
tgen, TOPO, dut, GROUP_RANGE, oif, rp_address_2, SOURCE
)
result = verify_pim_rp_info(tgen, TOPO, dut, GROUP_RANGE, oif, rp_address_2, SOURCE)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r1: rp-info is present for group 225.1.1.1 \n Error: {}".format(
@ -1440,8 +1434,9 @@ def test_send_join_on_higher_preffered_rp_p1(request):
state_after = verify_pim_interface_traffic(tgen, state_dict)
assert isinstance(
state_after, dict
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " \
"Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
), "Testcase{} : Failed \n state_before is not dictionary \n " "Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
result = verify_state_incremented(state_before, state_after)
assert result is True, "Testcase{} : Failed Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
@ -1648,9 +1643,7 @@ def test_RP_configured_as_LHR_1_p1(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("r3: Verify (S, G) upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r3: (S, G) upstream join state is joined and join"
@ -1857,9 +1850,7 @@ def test_RP_configured_as_LHR_2_p1(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("r3: Verify (S, G) upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
@ -2067,9 +2058,7 @@ def test_RP_configured_as_FHR_1_p1(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("r3: Verify (S, G) upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
@ -2079,12 +2068,8 @@ def test_RP_configured_as_FHR_1_p1(request):
step("r3: Verify (S, G) ip mroutes")
oif = "r3-r1-eth0"
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS,
iif, oif)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
tc_name,
result
)
result = verify_ip_mroutes(tgen, dut, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS, iif, oif)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
# Uncomment next line for debugging
# tgen.mininet_cli()
@ -2282,9 +2267,7 @@ def test_RP_configured_as_FHR_2_p2(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("r3: Verify (S, G) upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
@ -2411,9 +2394,7 @@ def test_SPT_RPT_path_different_p1(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("r3: Verify (S, G) upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
@ -2435,9 +2416,7 @@ def test_SPT_RPT_path_different_p1(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("r2: Verify (S, G) upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r2: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(
@ -2666,9 +2645,7 @@ def test_restart_pimd_process_p2(request):
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
step("r3: Verify (S, G) upstream join state and join timer")
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(
tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS
)
result = verify_join_state_and_timer(tgen, dut, iif, SOURCE_ADDRESS, GROUP_ADDRESS)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
"r3: (S,G) upstream state is joined and join timer is running\n Error: {}".format(

270
tests/topotests/static_routing_with_ebgp/test_static_routes_topo1_ebgp.py
View File

@ -142,9 +142,7 @@ def setup_module(mod):
# Api call verify whether BGP is converged
converged = verify_bgp_convergence(tgen, topo)
assert converged is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(
converged
)
assert converged is True, "setup_module :Failed \n Error: {}".format(converged)
logger.info("Running setup_module() done")
@ -312,8 +310,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1")
@ -368,15 +367,19 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is"\
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [next_hop_ip["nh1"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N2")
input_dict_4 = {
@ -407,8 +410,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
nh = next_hop_ip["nh1"][addr_type]
result = verify_rib(
@ -420,15 +424,21 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
result = verify_rib(
tgen,
@ -439,27 +449,35 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
next_hop=nh,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
dut = "r2"
nh = [next_hop_ip["nh2"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
dut = "r2"
step("No shut the nexthop interface N1")
@ -474,8 +492,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Shut nexthop interface N2")
intf = topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r1-link1"]["interface"]
@ -483,7 +502,7 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, False)
step(
" after shut of nexthop N1 , route become active with " \
" after shut of nexthop N1 , route become active with "
"nexthop N2 and vice versa."
)
nh = next_hop_ip["nh2"][addr_type]
@ -497,8 +516,11 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [next_hop_ip["nh1"][addr_type]]
dut = "r2"
@ -506,19 +528,24 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("No shut nexthop interface N2")
dut = "r2"
@ -533,19 +560,24 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Reload the FRR router")
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
@ -561,19 +593,26 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -645,8 +684,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
rte2_nh2 = {
"r2": {
@ -672,8 +712,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure IBGP IPv4 peering between R2 and R3 router.")
step("Explicit route is added in R3 for R2 nexthop rechability")
@ -762,8 +803,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
rte2_nh2 = {
"r2": {
@ -780,8 +822,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte2_nh2, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1")
rte1_nh1 = {
@ -834,15 +877,19 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [next_hop_ip["nh1"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N2")
rte2_nh2 = {
@ -880,15 +927,19 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [next_hop_ip["nh2"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte2_nh2, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("No shut the nexthop interface N1")
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, True)
@ -902,8 +953,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Shut nexthop interface N2")
intf = topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r1-link1"]["interface"]
@ -925,15 +977,19 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [next_hop_ip["nh1"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("No shut nexthop interface N2")
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, True)
@ -959,8 +1015,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
rte2_nh2 = {
"r2": {
@ -986,8 +1043,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
protocol = "bgp"
@ -1002,8 +1060,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r2"
step("Reload the FRR router")
@ -1033,14 +1092,16 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
protocol = "bgp"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
rte2_nh2 = {
"r2": {
@ -1066,14 +1127,16 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
protocol = "bgp"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, rte2_nh2, next_hop=nh)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
result = verify_rib(
tgen,
@ -1085,8 +1148,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -1156,14 +1220,20 @@ def test_same_rte_from_bgp_static_p0_tc5_ebgp(request):
step("Verify on R3 , route receive on R3 BGP table ")
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Verify route installed in the RIB and FIB of R3")
protocol = "bgp"
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step(
"Configure 2 links/interfaces between R1 and R3 , keep one"
@ -1214,15 +1284,19 @@ def test_same_rte_from_bgp_static_p0_tc5_ebgp(request):
)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" missing in BGP RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in BGP RIB".format(
tc_name
)
protocol = "bgp"
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Remove the static route on R3 configured with active" "interface")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1257,15 +1331,19 @@ def test_same_rte_from_bgp_static_p0_tc5_ebgp(request):
)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" missing in BGP RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in BGP RIB".format(
tc_name
)
protocol = "bgp"
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)

195
tests/topotests/static_routing_with_ebgp/test_static_routes_topo2_ebgp.py
View File

@ -314,8 +314,9 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
next_hop=nh_all[addr_type],
protocol=protocol,
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -338,8 +339,9 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
dut = "r3"
protocol = "bgp"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
@ -384,8 +386,11 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -410,8 +415,11 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
protocol = "static"
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
@ -455,8 +463,9 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
next_hop=nh_all[addr_type],
protocol=protocol,
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Remove random static route with all the nexthop")
dut = "r2"
@ -493,8 +502,9 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
input_dict_4 = {
@ -546,8 +556,9 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
next_hop=nh_all[addr_type],
protocol=protocol,
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Remove the redistribute static knob")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -580,8 +591,11 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -661,8 +675,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
@ -679,8 +694,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
wait=2,
attempts=3,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
@ -723,8 +739,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
@ -770,8 +789,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
nh.append(NEXT_HOP_IP["nh" + str(nhp)][addr_type])
@ -787,8 +807,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
wait=2,
attempts=3,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
@ -815,8 +836,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Random no shut of the nexthop interfaces")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -826,8 +850,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_5, next_hop=nhip, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r2"
protocol = "static"
@ -955,8 +980,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
@ -971,8 +997,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
@ -1015,8 +1042,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
@ -1062,8 +1092,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
nh.append(NEXT_HOP_IP["nh" + str(nhp)][addr_type])
@ -1077,8 +1108,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
@ -1105,8 +1137,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Random no shut of the nexthop interfaces")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1116,8 +1151,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ebgp_ecmp_p1_tc8_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_5, next_hop=nhip, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r2"
protocol = "static"
@ -1230,8 +1266,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that highest AD nexthop are inactive")
nh = []
@ -1249,8 +1286,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
wait=2,
attempts=3,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1312,8 +1350,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1355,8 +1396,10 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
"lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
"lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
@ -1383,8 +1426,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Random no shut of the nexthop interfaces")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1394,8 +1440,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_5, next_hop=nhip, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Remove random static route with all the nexthop")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1434,8 +1481,10 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route " \
" is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route "
" is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Reconfigure the deleted routes and verify they are installed")
for nhp in range(1, 9):
@ -1460,8 +1509,10 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ebgp(request):
protocol = "static"
nh = NEXT_HOP_IP["nh1"][addr_type]
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route " \
" is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route "
" is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Reload the FRR router")
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
@ -1577,8 +1628,9 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that highest AD nexthop are inactive")
nh = []
@ -1594,8 +1646,9 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1647,8 +1700,11 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
for nhp in range(1, 9):
@ -1715,8 +1771,11 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still active in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)

170
tests/topotests/static_routing_with_ebgp/test_static_routes_topo3_ebgp.py
View File

@ -297,8 +297,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
input_dict_2 = {
@ -351,8 +352,11 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by" "one")
@ -379,8 +383,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
@ -407,8 +412,11 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Random no shut of the nexthop interfaces")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -418,8 +426,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_5, next_hop=nhip, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Reload the FRR router")
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
@ -429,8 +438,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -509,8 +519,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
@ -525,8 +537,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes "
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -569,8 +583,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step(
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
@ -613,8 +629,11 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by" "one")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -655,8 +674,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
@ -671,8 +692,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes "
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
@ -699,8 +722,11 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Random no shut of the nexthop interfaces")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -710,8 +736,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_5, next_hop=nhip, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Reload the FRR router")
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
@ -740,8 +767,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
@ -756,8 +785,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ebgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes "
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -818,18 +849,25 @@ def test_bgp_local_nexthop_p1_tc14_ebgp(request):
step("Verify R2 BGP table has IPv4 route")
dut = "r2"
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB of R2".format(
tc_name
)
step(" Verify route did not install in the R3 BGP table, RIB/FIB")
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, expected=False)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in BGP RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is"
" still present in BGP RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
)
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, expected=False)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is"
" still present in RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -889,8 +927,9 @@ def test_frr_intf_name_as_gw_gap_tc4_ebgp_p0(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, next_hop=nh
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
input_dict_nh = {
"r1": {
@ -902,8 +941,9 @@ def test_frr_intf_name_as_gw_gap_tc4_ebgp_p0(request):
}
}
result = verify_ip_nht(tgen, input_dict_nh)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Nexthop is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Nexthop is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Shut / no shut IPv4 and IPv6 static next hop interface from"
@ -925,8 +965,9 @@ def test_frr_intf_name_as_gw_gap_tc4_ebgp_p0(request):
next_hop=nh,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, True)
@ -970,8 +1011,11 @@ def test_frr_intf_name_as_gw_gap_tc4_ebgp_p0(request):
next_hop=nh,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -1034,8 +1078,9 @@ def test_static_route_with_tag_p0_tc_13_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure route-map on R2 with allow tag1 and deny tag2")
@ -1116,8 +1161,10 @@ def test_static_route_with_tag_p0_tc_13_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_0, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
"tag 4002 is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
"tag 4002 is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
dut = "r2"
input_dict_1 = {
@ -1125,8 +1172,10 @@ def test_static_route_with_tag_p0_tc_13_ebgp(request):
}
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_0, protocol=protocol)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
"tag 4001 is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
"tag 4001 is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Modify the route-map to allow tag2 and deny tag1")
# Create route map
@ -1164,8 +1213,10 @@ def test_static_route_with_tag_p0_tc_13_ebgp(request):
}
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_0, protocol=protocol)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
"tag 4002 is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
"tag 4002 is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
input_dict_1 = {
"r2": {"static_routes": [{"network": NETWORK[addr_type], "tag": 4001}]}
@ -1173,8 +1224,10 @@ def test_static_route_with_tag_p0_tc_13_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
"tag 4001 is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
"tag 4001 is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Configure one static route with 2 ECMP nexthop N1 and N2")
step("For N1 configure tag 1 and for N2 configure tag 2")
@ -1213,8 +1266,9 @@ def test_static_route_with_tag_p0_tc_13_ebgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("shut/no shut of tag1 and tag2 nexthop")

31
tests/topotests/static_routing_with_ebgp/test_static_routes_topo4_ebgp.py
View File

@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ NEXT_HOP_IP = {}
pytestmark = [pytest.mark.bgpd, pytest.mark.staticd]
class CreateTopo(Topo):
"""
Test CreateTopo - topology 1.
@ -239,8 +240,11 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
step(" All BGP nbrs are down as authentication is mismatch on both" " the sides")
bgp_convergence = verify_bgp_convergence(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert bgp_convergence is not True, "Testcase {} : " \
"Failed \n BGP nbrs must be down. Error: {}".format(tc_name, bgp_convergence)
assert (
bgp_convergence is not True
), "Testcase {} : " "Failed \n BGP nbrs must be down. Error: {}".format(
tc_name, bgp_convergence
)
step(
"Configure 4 IPv4 and 4 IPv6 nbrs with macthing password "
@ -335,8 +339,9 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
"show ip prefix list"
)
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, input_dict_2)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
" Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" " Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
step("Redistribute all the routes (connected, static)")
input_dict_2_r1 = {
@ -586,8 +591,10 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
result4 = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result4 is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is " \
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
assert result4 is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is "
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
)
step(
"VM4 and VM6 IPV4 and IPv6 address are present in local and "
@ -962,8 +969,10 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
)
input_dict = {"r1": {"static_routes": [{"network": ntwk_r2_vm1}]}}
result4 = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict)
assert result4 is True, "Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is " \
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
assert result4 is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is "
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
)
step("vm4 should be present in FRR2")
dut = "r2"
@ -974,8 +983,10 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ebgp(request):
)
input_dict = {"r1": {"static_routes": [{"network": ntwk_r2_vm1}]}}
result4 = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict)
assert result4 is True, "Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is " \
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
assert result4 is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is "
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
)
dut = "r3"
protocol = "bgp"

238
tests/topotests/static_routing_with_ibgp/test_static_routes_topo1_ibgp.py
View File

@ -242,8 +242,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure IBGP IPv4 peering between R2 and R3 router.")
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
@ -296,15 +297,19 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [NEXT_HOP_IP["nh2"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1")
@ -359,15 +364,19 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [NEXT_HOP_IP["nh1"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N2")
input_dict_4 = {
@ -398,8 +407,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
nh = NEXT_HOP_IP["nh1"][addr_type]
result = verify_rib(
@ -411,15 +421,21 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
result = verify_rib(
tgen,
@ -430,27 +446,35 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
next_hop=nh,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
dut = "r2"
nh = [NEXT_HOP_IP["nh2"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
dut = "r2"
step("No shut the nexthop interface N1")
@ -465,8 +489,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Shut nexthop interface N2")
intf = topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r1-link1"]["interface"]
@ -488,8 +513,11 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [NEXT_HOP_IP["nh1"][addr_type]]
dut = "r2"
@ -497,19 +525,24 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("No shut nexthop interface N2")
dut = "r2"
@ -524,19 +557,24 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Reload the FRR router")
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
@ -552,19 +590,26 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_p0_tc_1_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -636,8 +681,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
rte2_nh2 = {
"r2": {
@ -663,8 +709,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure IBGP IPv4 peering between R2 and R3 router.")
step("Explicit route is added in R3 for R2 nexthop rechability")
@ -753,8 +800,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
rte2_nh2 = {
"r2": {
@ -771,8 +819,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte2_nh2, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1")
rte1_nh1 = {
@ -825,15 +874,19 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [NEXT_HOP_IP["nh1"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N2")
rte2_nh2 = {
@ -871,15 +924,19 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [NEXT_HOP_IP["nh2"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte2_nh2, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("No shut the nexthop interface N1")
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, True)
@ -893,8 +950,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Shut nexthop interface N2")
intf = topo["routers"]["r2"]["links"]["r1-link1"]["interface"]
@ -916,15 +974,19 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
nh = [NEXT_HOP_IP["nh1"][addr_type]]
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("No shut nexthop interface N2")
shutdown_bringup_interface(tgen, dut, intf, True)
@ -950,8 +1012,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
rte2_nh2 = {
"r2": {
@ -977,8 +1040,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
protocol = "bgp"
@ -993,8 +1057,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r2"
step("Reload the FRR router")
@ -1024,14 +1089,16 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
protocol = "bgp"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, rte1_nh1, next_hop=nh)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
rte2_nh2 = {
"r2": {
@ -1057,14 +1124,16 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r3"
protocol = "bgp"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, rte2_nh2, next_hop=nh)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
result = verify_rib(
tgen,
@ -1076,8 +1145,9 @@ def test_static_route_2nh_admin_dist_p0_tc_2_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
"not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" "not active in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)

228
tests/topotests/static_routing_with_ibgp/test_static_routes_topo2_ibgp.py
View File

@ -318,8 +318,9 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
next_hop=nh_all[addr_type],
protocol=protocol,
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -342,8 +343,9 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
dut = "r3"
protocol = "bgp"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
@ -388,8 +390,11 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes is" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -414,8 +419,11 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed\nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
protocol = "static"
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
@ -459,8 +467,9 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
next_hop=nh_all[addr_type],
protocol=protocol,
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Remove random static route with all the nexthop")
dut = "r2"
@ -497,8 +506,9 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
input_dict_4 = {
@ -550,8 +560,9 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
next_hop=nh_all[addr_type],
protocol=protocol,
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Remove the redistribute static knob")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -584,8 +595,11 @@ def test_static_rte_with_8ecmp_nh_p1_tc9_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -665,8 +679,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
@ -683,8 +698,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
wait=2,
attempts=3,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
@ -727,8 +743,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
@ -774,8 +793,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
nh.append(NEXT_HOP_IP["nh" + str(nhp)][addr_type])
@ -791,8 +811,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
wait=2,
attempts=3,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
@ -819,8 +840,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Random no shut of the nexthop interfaces")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -830,8 +854,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_5, next_hop=nhip, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
protocol = "bgp"
# this is next hop reachability route in r3 as we are using ibgp
@ -856,8 +881,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
input_dict_4 = {"r2": {"static_routes": [{"network": PREFIX1[addr_type]}]}}
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
protocol = "static"
dut = "r2"
@ -964,8 +990,10 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc6_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" strill present in RIB of R3".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are"
" strill present in RIB of R3".format(tc_name)
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -1060,8 +1088,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
@ -1076,8 +1105,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step(
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
@ -1120,8 +1150,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
@ -1167,8 +1200,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
nh.append(NEXT_HOP_IP["nh" + str(nhp)][addr_type])
@ -1182,8 +1216,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
@ -1210,8 +1245,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Random no shut of the nexthop interfaces")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1221,8 +1259,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_5, next_hop=nhip, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
dut = "r2"
protocol = "bgp"
@ -1249,8 +1288,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
input_dict_4 = {"r2": {"static_routes": [{"network": PREFIX1[addr_type]}]}}
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
protocol = "static"
dut = "r2"
@ -1357,8 +1397,10 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_ibgp_ecmp_p1_tc7_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB of R3".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are"
" still present in RIB of R3".format(tc_name)
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -1453,8 +1495,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that highest AD nexthop are inactive")
nh = []
@ -1472,8 +1515,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
wait=2,
attempts=3,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1535,8 +1579,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by one")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1578,8 +1625,10 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
"lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
"lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
@ -1606,8 +1655,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Random no shut of the nexthop interfaces")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1617,8 +1669,9 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_5, next_hop=nhip, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Remove random static route with all the nexthop")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1657,8 +1710,10 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route " \
" is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route "
" is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Reconfigure the deleted routes and verify they are installed")
for nhp in range(1, 9):
@ -1683,8 +1738,10 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
protocol = "static"
nh = NEXT_HOP_IP["nh1"][addr_type]
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route " \
" is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route "
" is still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Reload the FRR router")
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
@ -1704,9 +1761,7 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Remove the redistribute static knob")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1750,8 +1805,11 @@ def test_static_route_8nh_diff_AD_bgp_ecmp_p1_tc10_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -1845,8 +1903,9 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Verify that highest AD nexthop are inactive")
nh = []
@ -1862,8 +1921,9 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " " are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -1915,8 +1975,11 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
for nhp in range(1, 9):
@ -1983,8 +2046,11 @@ def test_static_route_delete_p0_tc11_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still active in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)

120
tests/topotests/static_routing_with_ibgp/test_static_routes_topo3_ibgp.py
View File

@ -298,8 +298,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
input_dict_2 = {
@ -352,8 +353,11 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by" "one")
@ -380,8 +384,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
@ -408,8 +413,11 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Random no shut of the nexthop interfaces")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -419,8 +427,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_5, next_hop=nhip, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Reload the FRR router")
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
@ -430,8 +439,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_p0_tc3_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -510,8 +520,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
@ -526,8 +538,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes "
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Configure redistribute static in BGP on R2 router")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -570,8 +584,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step(
"Remove the static route configured with nexthop N1 to N8, one"
@ -614,8 +630,11 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" " still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Configure the static route with nexthop N1 to N8, one by" "one")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -656,8 +675,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
@ -672,8 +693,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes "
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Random shut of the nexthop interfaces")
randnum = random.randint(0, 7)
@ -700,8 +723,11 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is not True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are still present in RIB".format(
tc_name
)
step("Random no shut of the nexthop interfaces")
for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@ -711,8 +737,9 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_5, next_hop=nhip, protocol=protocol
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
"Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n" "Error: Routes are missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
step("Reload the FRR router")
# stop/start -> restart FRR router and verify
@ -741,8 +768,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
result = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, next_hop=nh, protocol=protocol, fib=True
)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with " \
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Route with "
" lowest AD is missing in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
nh = []
for nhp in range(2, 9):
@ -757,8 +786,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
fib=True,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes " \
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes "
" with high AD are active in RIB".format(tc_name)
)
step("Remove the redistribute static knob")
@ -796,8 +827,10 @@ def test_staticroute_with_ecmp_with_diff_AD_p0_tc4_ibgp(request):
protocol=protocol,
expected=False,
)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are" \
" still present in RIB of R3".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes are"
" still present in RIB of R3".format(tc_name)
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)
@ -858,18 +891,25 @@ def test_bgp_local_nexthop_p1_tc14_ibgp(request):
step("Verify R2 BGP table has IPv4 route")
dut = "r2"
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4)
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" missing in RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
assert (
result is True
), "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" " missing in RIB of R2".format(
tc_name
)
step(" Verify route did not install in the R3 BGP table, RIB/FIB")
dut = "r3"
result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, expected=False)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in BGP RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is"
" still present in BGP RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
)
result = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_4, expected=False)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is" \
" still present in RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
assert result is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed \nError: Routes is"
" still present in RIB of R2".format(tc_name)
)
write_test_footer(tc_name)

30
tests/topotests/static_routing_with_ibgp/test_static_routes_topo4_ibgp.py
View File

@ -239,8 +239,11 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
step(" All BGP nbrs are down as authentication is mismatch on both" " the sides")
bgp_convergence = verify_bgp_convergence(tgen, topo, expected=False)
assert bgp_convergence is not True, "Testcase {} : " \
"Failed \n BGP nbrs must be down. Error: {}".format(tc_name, bgp_convergence)
assert (
bgp_convergence is not True
), "Testcase {} : " "Failed \n BGP nbrs must be down. Error: {}".format(
tc_name, bgp_convergence
)
step(
"Configure 4 IPv4 and 4 IPv6 nbrs with macthing password "
@ -335,8 +338,9 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
"show ip prefix list"
)
result = verify_prefix_lists(tgen, input_dict_2)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" \
" Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
assert result is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n" " Error: {}".format(
tc_name, result
)
step("Redistribute all the routes (connected, static)")
input_dict_2_r1 = {
@ -586,8 +590,10 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
result4 = verify_rib(
tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
)
assert result4 is not True, "Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is " \
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
assert result4 is not True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is "
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
)
step(
"VM4 and VM6 IPV4 and IPv6 address are present in local and "
@ -962,8 +968,10 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
)
input_dict = {"r1": {"static_routes": [{"network": ntwk_r2_vm1}]}}
result4 = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict)
assert result4 is True, "Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is " \
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
assert result4 is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is "
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
)
step("vm4 should be present in FRR2")
dut = "r2"
@ -974,8 +982,10 @@ def test_static_routes_rmap_pfxlist_p0_tc7_ibgp(request):
)
input_dict = {"r1": {"static_routes": [{"network": ntwk_r2_vm1}]}}
result4 = verify_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict)
assert result4 is True, "Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is " \
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
assert result4 is True, (
"Testcase {} : Failed , VM1 route is "
"not filtered out via prefix list. \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result4)
)
dut = "r3"
protocol = "bgp"