From aaf24c74e44438a55decfc1e2f0930f800a3a650 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Quentin Young Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:19:23 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] babeld: be more explicit about route resize result Resizing the route array can fail. Although the error condition is already correctly handled, if we're more explicit about the variables we expect to be initialized then clang-analyze is happier. Signed-off-by: Quentin Young --- babeld/route.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/babeld/route.c b/babeld/route.c index 501dd1f4df..bc7590fb39 100644 --- a/babeld/route.c +++ b/babeld/route.c @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ insert_route(struct babel_route *route) resize_route_table(max_route_slots < 1 ? 8 : 2 * max_route_slots); if(route_slots >= max_route_slots) return NULL; + assert(routes); route->next = NULL; if(n < route_slots) memmove(routes + n + 1, routes + n,