mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_frr
synced 2025-06-14 12:52:37 +00:00
tests: Fix multicast_pim_bsm_topo2 static route issue
API to verify static route was checking whether router is installed with expected nexthop. In this particular scenario we has same route as Connected and Static both. In heavy loaded system static routes was taking time to get installed and API was doing the verification on Connected route instead Static route. Enhanced scripts to check only static routes. Issue: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/11563 Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Kashyap <kashyapk@vmware.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cfab3187bc
commit
a7bccdc582
@ -304,7 +304,6 @@ def pre_config_to_bsm(tgen, topo, tc_name, bsr, sender, receiver, fhr, rp, lhr,
|
||||
|
||||
# Add static routes
|
||||
input_dict = {
|
||||
fhr: {"static_routes": [{"network": bsr_route, "next_hop": next_hop}]},
|
||||
rp: {"static_routes": [{"network": bsr_route, "next_hop": next_hop_rp}]},
|
||||
lhr: {"static_routes": [{"network": bsr_route, "next_hop": next_hop_lhr}]},
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -313,9 +312,11 @@ def pre_config_to_bsm(tgen, topo, tc_name, bsr, sender, receiver, fhr, rp, lhr,
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
for dut, _nexthop in zip([fhr, rp, lhr], [next_hop, next_hop_rp, next_hop_lhr]):
|
||||
for dut, _nexthop in zip([rp, lhr], [next_hop_rp, next_hop_lhr]):
|
||||
input_routes = {dut: input_dict[dut]}
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_routes, _nexthop)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_routes, _nexthop, protocol="static"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -343,7 +344,9 @@ def pre_config_to_bsm(tgen, topo, tc_name, bsr, sender, receiver, fhr, rp, lhr,
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", fhr, input_dict, next_hop_fhr)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", fhr, input_dict, next_hop_fhr, protocol="static"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -355,7 +358,9 @@ def pre_config_to_bsm(tgen, topo, tc_name, bsr, sender, receiver, fhr, rp, lhr,
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", lhr, input_dict, next_hop_lhr)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", lhr, input_dict, next_hop_lhr, protocol="static"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -473,7 +478,9 @@ def test_BSR_higher_prefer_ip_p0(request):
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
for dut, _nexthop in zip(["i1", "l1"], [next_hop_rp, next_hop_lhr]):
|
||||
input_routes = {dut: input_dict[dut]}
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_routes, _nexthop)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_routes, _nexthop, protocol="static"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -482,7 +489,9 @@ def test_BSR_higher_prefer_ip_p0(request):
|
||||
input_routes = {
|
||||
"f1": {"static_routes": [{"network": bsr_add, "next_hop": next_hop}]}
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", "f1", input_routes, next_hop)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", "f1", input_routes, next_hop, protocol="static"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -673,7 +682,9 @@ def test_BSR_CRP_with_blackhole_address_p1(request):
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
for dut, _nexthop in zip(["i1", "l1"], [next_hop_rp, next_hop_lhr]):
|
||||
input_routes = {dut: input_dict[dut]}
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_routes, _nexthop)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_routes, _nexthop, protocol="static"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -681,7 +692,9 @@ def test_BSR_CRP_with_blackhole_address_p1(request):
|
||||
input_routes = {
|
||||
"f1": {"static_routes": [{"network": CRP, "next_hop": next_hop_fhr}]}
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", "f1", input_routes, expected=False)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", "f1", input_routes, protocol="static", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Route is still present \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
@ -705,7 +718,7 @@ def test_BSR_CRP_with_blackhole_address_p1(request):
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", "f1", input_dict)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", "f1", input_dict, protocol="static")
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
intf_f1_i1 = topo["routers"]["f1"]["links"]["i1"]["interface"]
|
||||
@ -764,7 +777,7 @@ def test_BSR_CRP_with_blackhole_address_p1(request):
|
||||
input_dict = {
|
||||
"f1": {"static_routes": [{"network": BSR1_ADDR, "next_hop": NEXT_HOP1}]}
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", "f1", input_dict, NEXT_HOP1)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", "f1", input_dict, NEXT_HOP1, protocol="static")
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
input_dict = {
|
||||
@ -774,7 +787,9 @@ def test_BSR_CRP_with_blackhole_address_p1(request):
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", "f1", input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", "f1", input_dict, protocol="static", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is not True, (
|
||||
"Testcase {} : Failed \n "
|
||||
"Routes:[{}, {}] are still present \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
@ -1703,7 +1718,9 @@ def test_iif_join_state_p0(request):
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", "l1", input_dict, expected=False)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", "l1", input_dict, protocol="static", expected=False
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
result is not True
|
||||
), "Testcase {} : Failed \n " "Routes:{} are still present \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
@ -1751,7 +1768,7 @@ def test_iif_join_state_p0(request):
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", "l1", input_dict, next_hop_lhr)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", "l1", input_dict, next_hop_lhr, protocol="static")
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {}:Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify that (*,G) installed in mroute again
|
||||
|
@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ def pre_config_to_bsm(tgen, topo, tc_name, bsr, sender, receiver, fhr, rp, lhr,
|
||||
|
||||
# Add static routes
|
||||
input_dict = {
|
||||
fhr: {"static_routes": [{"network": bsr_route, "next_hop": next_hop}]},
|
||||
rp: {"static_routes": [{"network": bsr_route, "next_hop": next_hop_rp}]},
|
||||
lhr: {"static_routes": [{"network": bsr_route, "next_hop": next_hop_lhr}]},
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -254,9 +253,11 @@ def pre_config_to_bsm(tgen, topo, tc_name, bsr, sender, receiver, fhr, rp, lhr,
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
for dut, _nexthop in zip([fhr, rp, lhr], [next_hop, next_hop_rp, next_hop_lhr]):
|
||||
for dut, _nexthop in zip([rp, lhr], [next_hop_rp, next_hop_lhr]):
|
||||
input_routes = {dut: input_dict[dut]}
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_routes, _nexthop)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_routes, _nexthop, protocol="static"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -300,7 +301,9 @@ def pre_config_to_bsm(tgen, topo, tc_name, bsr, sender, receiver, fhr, rp, lhr,
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", fhr, input_dict, next_hop_fhr)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", fhr, input_dict, next_hop_fhr, protocol="static"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -312,7 +315,9 @@ def pre_config_to_bsm(tgen, topo, tc_name, bsr, sender, receiver, fhr, rp, lhr,
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
|
||||
|
||||
# Verifying static routes are installed
|
||||
result = verify_rib(tgen, "ipv4", lhr, input_dict, next_hop_lhr)
|
||||
result = verify_rib(
|
||||
tgen, "ipv4", lhr, input_dict, next_hop_lhr, protocol="static"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error {}".format(
|
||||
tc_name, result
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user